1. TruView Global 2.0 Competitive Landscape
For Leica Internal use ONLY!

2. The Competitive Landscape: Overview
Many different technologies and products compete with TruView Global
Cloud Based Services
Self-installed products
Service oriented solutions
Technology components
Prices range all over the place
Nearly impossible to do a 1-to-1 price comparison
Fast changing market
New competitors all the time
Competitors going away
No clear market leader (except for Classic TruView)

3. The Competitive Landscape: Players
Faro Scene: Webshare
Recap 360: RealView
LFM: NetView
PointScene
uGRIDD: LiDAR2Map, TruView2Map
New Spin
Arena 4D Web
ENI/OS
Ayelix
Potree

4. The Competitive Landscape: Categories
Offering Types:
Cloud based services
Self installed products
Consulting service offerings
Technology components
Product Focus:
Engineering tools/processes
Visual/Virtual utilities

5. TruView Global: Key Differentiators
Multi-Sensor Support
Data from any scanner brand, mobile, hand-held, drone, aerial, etc.
3D Model data included
Pano from any location
API Available

6. TruView Global: More Differentiators
Cost/price model
100% targeting ease of use
Privacy and self branding
Project style platform (Back-end)
Security (Choice of where it is running)
The most devices/browsers

7. Faro WebShare

8. The Competitive Landscape: Faro Webshare
A rather mature product that has some more advanced features than TruView Global.
Pano positions and full 3D capability
Mobile device support
Markups, measure, etc
Download scan data
Linking capabilities
Leans towards engineering focused tools vs simple user
WebShare 2 Go: Disconnected package capability

9. The Competitive Landscape: Faro Webshare
Cloud service offering only
Self installed version discontinued
User/Data Limit business model

10. The Competitive Landscape: Faro Webshare
3D Cloud
Master Screen

11. SiteMap
Info Screen

12. The Competitive Landscape: Faro Webshare
Cloud service offering only
User/Data Limit model
$999, 1 Year, 50 GB, 10 users
$1,995 1 Year, 100GB, 25 users

13. The Competitive Landscape: Faro Webshare
Conclusions:
Focused a bit more on engineering processes
Effects ease of use
Public Web only
Locks out part of the market
Cost adds up
$1,000 per portal, every year
10 Portals $10,000
Can be expensive
Not the easiest to use
Very public feel
Must be on their server

14. Autodesk
Recap 360 RealView

15. The Competitive Landscape: Autodesk Recap RealView
A rather immature product that has only basic features
Pano positions only
Mobile device support
Basic Markups, measure, etc
Very simple user concept
No packaging concept

16. The Competitive Landscape: Recap RealView
Cloud service offering only
Self installed version not available
Unlimited users but Data Limit business model

17. The Competitive Landscape: Recap RealView
Entry Page
Logged in

18. The Competitive Landscape: Recap RealView
Viewer
SiteMap

19. The Competitive Landscape: Recap RealView
Cloud service offering only
Data Limit model
$300 per year for 100GB

20. The Competitive Landscape: Recap RealView
Conclusions:
Very basic interface
Adding users is very small scale per project method
Invite each by for each sitemap
No self install
Locks out part of the market
Requires Autodesk 360 account
Low cost but very public feel
Very public feel
Must be on their server
Not efficient or professional grade in user setup

21. LFM NetView

22. The Competitive Landscape: LFM NetView
A very complete product that has engineering like features
Pano positions only
Tablet support (Chrome and IE11 Only)
Engineering like markups, measure, etc
Expert user concept (not ease of use)
Packaging concept

23. The Competitive Landscape: LFM NetView
Self-installed Server can be cloud based
No service offering
Per project pricing model

24. The Competitive Landscape: LFM NetView
SiteMap

25. The Competitive Landscape: LFM NetView
Viewer

26. The Competitive Landscape: LFM NetView
Viewer

27. The Competitive Landscape: LFM NetView
Self-installed Only
Requires live connection to actual cloud database
Free browser interface (IE11 and Chrome only)
$1,800 per project
$18, projects

28. The Competitive Landscape: LFM NetView
Conclusions:
100% Engineering focused interface
Project data connection is in-secure
No service offering
Requires engineering skills to use
Limited device support (IE11/Chrome only)
Costs add up $18,000 for 10 projects
Engineering tool feel, not easy
Point cloud data is vulnerable
Limited browsers
Expensive

29. POINTSCENE

30. The Competitive Landscape: POINTSCENE
A new product that currently only supports LAS, LAZ.
Full 3D capability
Chrome and Fire Fox only
Measure, No Markups
Download scan data
Linking capabilities
Leans towards engineering focused tools vs simple user
No disconnected option

31. The Competitive Landscape: POINTSCENE
Cloud service offering only
No self installed version
Service level business model + per user cost

32. The Competitive Landscape: POINTSCENE
3D Cloud
Master Screen

33. The Competitive Landscape: POINTSCENE

34. The Competitive Landscape: POINTSCENE
Conclusions:
LAS, LAZ only makes this not a real threat
Very public look
Per user cost seems low but who pays?
LAS,LAZ only
Every user pays

35. The Rest of the Field

36. The Competitive Landscape: Others
uGRIDD: US based, repackages TruView and other similar services
New Spin: Left the business, back to Pano tours
Arena 4D: More of a technology
ENI/OS: US Based, seems like more of a service, GIS\Asset Mgt. type linking
Ayelix: Norway Oil and Gas, service oriented
Potree: Technology

37. The TruView Global Advantage
Multi-Sensor Support
Mobile data
Hand Held data
Every scanner brand
Aerial data

38. The TruView Global Advantage
3D Models can be included
Virtual pano positions anywhere
API for deep integration

39. The TruView Global Advantage
User Experience
100% designed for ease of use
Every feature is understandable and useful
Not designed to be an engineers tool but still useful to engineers

40. The TruView Global Advantage
Device Support
No one has wider coverage
Most competitors have much less coverage

41. The TruView Global Advantage
Private Portal
Not based on a public site
Can be 100% inside the firewall if needed
Even shared system has strong wall of privacy between portals.
No “shared” projects up front

42. The TruView Global Advantage
Efficient and effective user/data access control
Single administrative back-end for all projects
Managed Project/user groups (portals)
One purchase supports many projects

43. The TruView Global Advantage
High Security
Data is where you decide it should be
Actual point cloud data is not at all accessible
Strong separation of users/data per portal

44. The TruView Global Advantage
Cost
We have the lowest cost solution accept for Autodesk
Autodesk solution is not really professional grade

45. The TruView Global Vulnerabilities
Cost beyond PUBLISHER
Promo pricing should help
Complexity
More perception that truth
Bringing support up to speed
Only at install, easiest system for admin and end users
No Web Service Available
Coming later this year
Major advantage to have both options with identical admin tools

46. The TruView Global Vulnerabilities
No packaging concept
TruView Classic still available and already has more users than any other system BY FAR
TVG Briefcase packaging coming soon