Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Jonathan W. Decker, MSN, ARNP, PhD-c Karen E. Dennis, PhD, RN, FAAN

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Jonathan W. Decker, MSN, ARNP, PhD-c Karen E. Dennis, PhD, RN, FAAN"— Presentation transcript:

1 Physiological and Behavioral Outcomes of Weight Loss in Postmenopausal Women
Jonathan W. Decker, MSN, ARNP, PhD-c Karen E. Dennis, PhD, RN, FAAN UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA College of Nursing Orlando, Florida PROBLEM Aging in women is associated with an increase in metabolic risk factors for CVD and numerous contributors to an upset in weight stability and body fat distribution PURPOSE In women: Postmenopausal Overweight and obese Examine the effects of lifestyle modification through: Nutrition Exercise Gender-specific weight management strategies In order to: Promote weight loss Reduce CVD risk factors Improve concomitant behaviors METHODS 6-month multi-faceted weight loss intervention Participants: 67 postmenopausal women Mostly Caucasian Baseline and post-treatment measures of: Cognitions Emotions Behaviors CVD risk factors At post-treatment, women were grouped by ≥10% weight loss (n=28) or <10% (n=39) weight loss MANOVA and ANCOVA used for data analysis FINDINGS Both weight loss groups significantly improved on nearly all parameters Some significant interaction effects: Between groups Across time Significantly greater improvement for women with ≥10% weight loss than <10%, weight loss using baseline measures as covariates for: Anthropometry Binge eating Some mood states CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS ≥10% weight loss in these women significantly improved physiological risk factors for CVD and behaviors associated with the obese state <10% weight loss also demonstrated significant improvement in these parameters but to a lesser magnitude ≥10% weight loss, achieved by 40% of these postmenopausal women, was supported as an optimal, initial target <10% weight loss still had positive outcomes, and but likely was a more realistic goal for 60% of these women who did not reach the 10% demarcation point RESULTS Baseline and post-treatment measures by weight loss group Measure Weight loss group <10% ≥10% Baseline Post-treatment Weight (kg) 84 ± 13 80 ± 13 *** 88 ± 13 76 ± 11 *** ††† BMI (kg/m2) 32± 4 30 ± 4 *** 32 ± 5 28 ± 4 *** ††† Waist (cm) 97± 11 94 ± 12 *** 100 ± 11 91 ± 9 *** ††† Hip (cm) 118.± 10 114 ± 10 *** 119 ± 10 110 ± 8 *** ††† Triglycerides (mg/dL) 117.± 47 107 ± 40 ** 143 ± 56 ‡ 125 ± 40 * Cholesterol (mg/dL) 218 ± 34 204 ± 38 *** 218 ± 32 191 ± 32 *** †† LDL-C (mg/dL) 132.± 29 125 ± 32 ** 134 ± 30 117 ± 28 *** †† HDL-C (mg/dL) 63 ± 13 58 ± 12 *** 52 ± 9 ‡ 49 ± 8 *** † Glucose (mg/dL) 91 ± 10 91 ± 9 86 ± 7 ** † Eating Behaviors for Weight Loss (EBI) 69 ± 10 88 ± 10 *** 71 ± 10 84 ± 20 ** Binge Eating (BE) 14 ± 8 9 ± 7 *** 6 ± 4 *** † Eating Self-Efficacy Scale (ESES) 97 ± 36 68 ± 27 *** 92 ± 25 62 ± 30 *** Affect 53 ± 25 36 ± 16 *** 51 ± 20 34 ± 21 ** Social 43 ± 13 32 ± 14 *** 41 ± 10 27 ± 12 *** Profile of Mood States (POMS) 21 ± 23 19 ± 22 21 ± 30 7 ± 18 ** † Tension 11 ± 5 9 ± 4 8 ± 4 † Vigor 17 ± 6 19 ± 7 16 ± 7 20± 6 ** Fatigue 7 ± 6 6 ± 5 5 ± 3 ** Confusion 8.± 4 8 ± 3 7 ± 5 6 ± 3 † Anger 6 ± 6 7 ± 7 4 ± 4 ** † ‡<0.05 Significant at baseline between groups *<0.5, **<0.01, ***<0.001 Significant across time within group †<0.05, ††<0.01, †††< Significant at post-treatment between groups with baseline as covariate Higher scores are better: EBI, POMS Vigor Lower scores are better: BE, ESES, POMS Tension, Fatigue, Confusion, Anger


Download ppt "Jonathan W. Decker, MSN, ARNP, PhD-c Karen E. Dennis, PhD, RN, FAAN"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google