Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Minnesota Geospatial Commons Test Implementation

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Minnesota Geospatial Commons Test Implementation"— Presentation transcript:

1 Minnesota Geospatial Commons Test Implementation
Geospatial Commons Workgroup Jessica Deegan, Metropolitan Council Presentation to State Agency Geospatial Advisory Council July 13, 2010

2 Overview Test implementation of the “Minnesota Geospatial Commons”
What is it? Who is involved? Why do this? When – timeline?

3 What is the “Commons”? A single place we all go to find and share geospatial resources

4 Organization MetroGIS Policy Board MnGeo & Advisory Councils
Coordinating Committee MnGeo Standards Technical Leadership Workgroup Geospatial Commons Workgroup Web Services Trust Issues Broker/Portal Implementation Identify Issues Define Requirements Identify Solutions Implement

5 Technical Leadership Workgroup
Why Joint Workgroup? Strong support at top and grass roots MetroGIS, DNR, MnGeo, Mn/DOT Previous work by Standards Committee Opportunity to collaboratively develop one web place MnGeo Standards Technical Leadership Workgroup Geospatial Commons Workgroup Web Services Trust Issues Broker/Portal Implementation

6 Why Create It? No single web location to find or share geo data in MN
Geo apps and web services even less accessible Opportunities to share more directly/effectively behind the scenes Users & Producers want it Survey results of geo data consumers

7 Why Create It? User/Producer Survey
Nearly 540 respondents; from casual map user to GIS professional Downloading data to use in desktop GIS still common – but increasing need for: Finding data in alternative ways – e.g. Google Search Demand for services, especially geocoding is prominent. Easy linking between services and desktop or web applications

8 Why “Commons” “Portal” = where you find. Belongs to some one else.
“Commons” = where you share. Belongs to all.

9 Key Functions Find Evaluate Share Administration

10 Key Functions - Find Search Catalog (viewable page)
Structured interface Spatial (e.g. bounding box) Metadata Google accessible Catalog (viewable page) Registry (back end database)

11 Key Functions - Evaluate
Metadata viewer Map viewer Download data or connect to web services User Reviews (quality, reliability, etc.) Web service monitoring

12 Key Functions - Share Publish Feeds (RSS & Twitter) News/discussion
Metadata Data for download Services for consumption Feeds (RSS & Twitter) News/discussion Shared development space Best practices

13 Key Functions - Administration
Catalog maintenance Harvesting Security & User management Registry of web service users Governance

14 Project Plan – Key Points
Test implementation with ESRI GeoPortal Extension MnGeo is hosting Roughly 300 person hours Sign off on resource commitment by 4 agencies (project sponsors) Demo at GIS/LIS Conference in Oct.?

15 Final Points Driven by producers Solid business needs
Strong executive commitment Highly talented workgroup

16 Active Workgroup Members
Chris Cialek, MnGeo Jessica Deegan, Met. Council Jim Dickerson, MnGeo Jessica Fendos, DEED Josh Gumm, Scott County John Harrison, Mn/DOT Mark Kotz, Met. Council (Chair) Susanne Maeder, MnGeo Chris Pouliot, DNR Nancy Rader, MnGeo Hal Watson, DNR Paul Weinberger, Mn/DOT

17 Environmental Mapping Commons
What are Web Services? EOC Flood Level Point Coordinates I need to know… Environmental Mapping Commons Point Coordinates Query MetroGIS Geocoding Service Address Information Feedlots Aerial Photos Stream ID Water Quality Dept. Agriculture Elevation Data Data Download MnGeo DNR MPCA

18 What are Web Services? Designed for easy sharing
Waiting there to use on the Internet Real Time! – no need for downloads/updates No need to centralize all data back


Download ppt "Minnesota Geospatial Commons Test Implementation"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google