1. Cell simulation in Geant4 Phase 1
S. Chauvie
INFN - Turin
CERN, December 6th, 2004

2. Simple cell-like simulation
Water
Our conclusion are not so innovative but since we deal with a not so used MC are not trivial
100 m

3. Photons, 10 keV
Our conclusion are not so innovative but since we deal with a not so used MC are not trivial

4. Energy deposition
Our conclusion are not so innovative but since we deal with a not so used MC are not trivial

5. Range
Our conclusion are not so innovative but since we deal with a not so used MC are not trivial

6. e-, 50 keV
Our conclusion are not so innovative but since we deal with a not so used MC are not trivial

7. Energy deposition
Our conclusion are not so innovative but since we deal with a not so used MC are not trivial

8. Range
Our conclusion are not so innovative but since we deal with a not so used MC are not trivial

9. e+, 50 keV
Our conclusion are not so innovative but since we deal with a not so used MC are not trivial

10. Energy deposition
Our conclusion are not so innovative but since we deal with a not so used MC are not trivial

11. Range
Our conclusion are not so innovative but since we deal with a not so used MC are not trivial

12. p, 2 MeV
Our conclusion are not so innovative but since we deal with a not so used MC are not trivial

13. Energy deposition
Our conclusion are not so innovative but since we deal with a not so used MC are not trivial

14. Range
Our conclusion are not so innovative but since we deal with a not so used MC are not trivial

15. 12C, 25 MeV/u
Our conclusion are not so innovative but since we deal with a not so used MC are not trivial

16. Energy deposition
Our conclusion are not so innovative but since we deal with a not so used MC are not trivial

17. Range
Our conclusion are not so innovative but since we deal with a not so used MC are not trivial

18. Soyland-Hassfjel experiment
Energy spectrum & Track diameter
Cells
1,5 mm Water
Our conclusion are not so innovative but since we deal with a not so used MC are not trivial
Po source
, 5,3 MeV

19. Kinetic energy distribution in 1,5 mm water
Soyland-Hassfjel experiment:4,5 MeV peak
Our conclusion are not so innovative but since we deal with a not so used MC are not trivial

20. Nanodosimetry experiments
Particle Energy (MeV/u) Target Ref
Br 0,4 tissue eq. gas Varma Med Biol 25/ (1980)
O 2,57 tissue eq. gas Varma Radiat. Res (1977)
Ge 17,2 propane Paretske Proc VI Symp Micro
U331 1,4 propane Toburem Radiat Prot Dos 31 No1/
U331 5,9 water “
Alpha 72 Varma Proc V Symp Micro 75-95
p 1 tissue eq gas Wingate Radiat Res (1976)
Alpha 1 “ “
Alpha “ “
Ne Varma Radiat Res
Our conclusion are not so innovative but since we deal with a not so used MC are not trivial

21. Kramer, Katz, Chatterje, Cuncinotta, Zaider, Wingate
Tracks model
Kramer, Katz, Chatterje, Cuncinotta, Zaider, Wingate
Our conclusion are not so innovative but since we deal with a not so used MC are not trivial

22. 16O, 2,57 MeV/u, Water
Our conclusion are not so innovative but since we deal with a not so used MC are not trivial

23. 16O, 2,57 MeV/u, Water
Our conclusion are not so innovative but since we deal with a not so used MC are not trivial

24. 2,57 MeV
12C
water
Our conclusion are not so innovative but since we deal with a not so used MC are not trivial

25. 1 MeV/u p
water
Our conclusion are not so innovative but since we deal with a not so used MC are not trivial