Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Estimating the Causal Effect of Children on Parents’ Well-being

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Estimating the Causal Effect of Children on Parents’ Well-being"— Presentation transcript:

1 Estimating the Causal Effect of Children on Parents’ Well-being
Strengths and Weaknesses of an Instrumental Variable Approach Gerrit Bauer Thorsten Kneip Dominik Steinbeißer

2 Motivation “The belief that parenthood makes people happier seems to be rather pervasive across the world” (Hansen, 2012, p33) “[…] adding virtually nothing to life, apart from perpetual difficulty and worry” (Donath, 2015, p359) “As well as providing reasons to expect the more satisfied to have higher fertility, the literature also provides other reasons which might lead one to expect lower fertility among the more satisfied” (Parr, 2010, p639) “[…] there is no reason to expect that parents will have better or worse lives than nonparents” (Deaton & Stone, 2014, p1328) “One of the central questions in the analysis of subjective well-being is whether people adapt to conditions. If this is the case, then […] conditions or circumstances may not matter, in the long run at least. ” (Clark et al., 2008, p222)

3 Different Research Questions & Methods
Cross sectional Twin-FE FE IV Parenthood Deaton & Stone (2014) Kohler et al. (2005) Myrskylä & Margolis (2014) ? Higher parities Margolis & Myrskylä (2011) # of children Stutzer & Frey (2006) (In-)direct effects Alesina et al. (2004) Pollmann-Schult (2014) Dynamic effects Frijters et al. (2011) Reverse effect Aassve et al. (2016)

4 Better Methods or Data? “Unfortunately, even the most advanced statistical approaches that have been used in this research fail to handle all […] problems, so reported results should be interpreted very cautiously” (Kravdal, 2014, p263)

5 Different Research Questions & Methods
Cross sectional Twin-FE FE IV Parenthood Deaton & Stone (2014) Kohler et al. (2005) Myrskylä & Margolis (2014) ? Higher parities Margolis & Myrskylä (2011) # of children Stutzer & Frey (2006) (In-)direct effects Alesina et al. (2004) Pollmann-Schult (2014) Dynamic effects Frijters et al. (2011) Reverse effect Aassve et al. (2016)

6 Distinguishing Causal Structures
#kids happy #kids happy #kids happy #kids happy #kids happy

7 Distinguishing Causal Structures
IV #kids happy IV #kids happy IV #kids happy IV #kids happy IV #kids happy

8 Distinguishing Causal Structures
IV #kids happy IV #kids happy X IV #kids happy IV #kids happy X IV #kids happy X

9 Distinguishing Causal Structures
twins #kids happy twins #kids happy X twins #kids happy twins #kids happy X twins #kids happy X

10 Identifiability of the Total Causal Effect

11 Assuming Conditional Exogeneity
twins #kids happy age infertility child mortality education + FE

12 Estimated Effects Men Women POLS + controls FE FE + controls IV IV + controls FE-IV FE-IV + controls -1 -.75 -.5 -.25 .25 .5 .75 1 1.25 1.5 -1 -.75 -.5 -.25 .25 .5 .75 1 1.25 1.5 Source: pairfam 7.0 W1-W7; own calculations 3,495 obs. in 11,823 obs. years; 321 twin years POLS

13 Identifiability of the Direct Effect

14 Mediation or Confoundedness?
Men Women .25 .5 .75 1 1.25 -.75 -.5 -.25 .25 .5 basic IV + hh income + income + workload + housework + pregnant + sleep + health + marrdur + cohabdur + reldur + relsat + socsat + sexsat

15 Identifiability of the Direct Effect

16 Identifiability of the Indirect Effect

17 Lessons Learned IV can help identify total causal effects in the presence of confounders reverse causality mediatiors correlated to the error of the treatment

18 Lessons Learned IV non-IV

19 Lessons Learned IV can help identify total causal effects in the presence of confounders reverse causality mediators correlated to the errors of treatment or oucome In case of doubt: Do not control variables that might be mediators or confounders of the treatment and outcome IV hardly relaxes the assumptions for identifying direct & indirect causal effects (unless the mediator is also instrumented)

20 Lessons Learned IV non-IV

21 Thank you

22 Example labour orientation income twins #kids happy family orientation

23 Costs of Children Women Men Effect on Happiness Effect on Happiness
1 1 0,5 0,5 Effect on Happiness Effect on Happiness -0,5 -0,5 -12 -6 6 12 18 24 30 36+ -12 -6 6 12 18 24 30 36+ Months before and after birth Months before and after birth Note: 4025 Respondents in Observations Note: 4318 Respondents in Observations total effect direct effect

24 Discussion of findings
According to the IV estimator, more children lead to an increase in happiness for men, but not women. OLS and FE estimates are insignificant for both men and women. Results substantially consistent over models for women, but not for men Possible reasons: OLS/FE: Ommitted variable bias OLS/FE: Over-control IV: Exclusion restriction does not hold Comparability of estimates across different model types? (N)ATE vs. ATT vs. LATE vs. LATT FE Models exploit different sample: those begetting children/twins (i.e. have young children) Result transferable to transition into parenthood? What if effects were only transitory?


Download ppt "Estimating the Causal Effect of Children on Parents’ Well-being"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google