Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Understanding protective immunity to Haemonchus contortus to aid development of a recombinant vaccine Eve Hanks1, Alexa Brett Roberts1, David Smith2, George.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Understanding protective immunity to Haemonchus contortus to aid development of a recombinant vaccine Eve Hanks1, Alexa Brett Roberts1, David Smith2, George."— Presentation transcript:

1 Understanding protective immunity to Haemonchus contortus to aid development of a recombinant vaccine Eve Hanks1, Alexa Brett Roberts1, David Smith2, George FJ Newlands2, David P Knox2, Alasdair J Nisbet2, Tom N McNeilly2, Collette Britton Institute of Biodiversity Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow 2 Moredun Research Institute, Edinburgh Introduction Haemonchus contortus is a blood feeding gastrointestinal parasite of small ruminants. Infection with this nematode leads to high production losses and up to 50% mortality in lambs. Anthelmintic resistance is an increasing problem and there is an urgent need for vaccination. Previous studies have shown some success following vaccination with H. contortus larval surface antigens, resulting in 61% reduction in faecal egg count (FEC) (Piedrafita, et al. 2012). Excretory/secretory (ES) products released by H. contortus can also induce protective immunity, with FEC reduced by 88.5% (Bassetto & Amarante, 2015). However, gut membrane proteins isolated from adult worms show most success and a native gut membrane protein vaccine is now sold commercially as Barbervax in Australia ( ; Bassetto & Amarante, 2015). This vaccine is enriched in proteases H11 and H-gal-GP complex. We recently initiated a study aiming to identify correlates of protective immunity that will help in developing a recombinant vaccine. Here we compare the antibody responses of sheep vaccinated with Barbervax with those vaccinated with C. elegans-expressed recombinant H. contortus proteases, including H11. Table 1: protection results of trial Barbervax group Recombinant group Group Vaccination Protection 1 Barbervax 90% 2 Recombinant C. elegans expressed proteases 0% 3 Adjuvant only challenge control Figure 4: ELISA antibody detection from individual sheep. Note sheep in Barbervax group have a higher response overall. Sheep 24 in the recombinant group has the best response and was most protected Results Western blot analysis was undertaken to determine patterns of antibody recognition to Barbervax protein antigens. The Barbervax vaccine group had the earliest response to H11 and HgalGP proteins. The best protected sheep with the lowest FECs in this group showed response at Day 28 as shown (Fig.2). In the recombinant vaccine group, sheep 24 showed the earliest appropriate response to vaccination (Fig. 3). Antibody titre for each group was detected by ELISA (Fig. 4) and this was highest in the Barbervax vaccine group. Again, sheep 24 from the recombinant group showed a marked antibody response to vaccination and this sheep had the lowest FEC of the group. Discussion This trial demonstrated that Barbervax vaccinated sheep recognise protective proteins earlier (Day 28) than recombinant vaccinated sheep and mount a stronger immune response overall. One Sheep (24) from the recombinant group has displayed signs of a protective response and there is a statistically significant reduction of 37% between the FEC of the challenge control group and the recombinant vaccinated group at Day 27 post challenge ( p value ). This is encouraging for recombinant vaccine development although further work is needed. Figure 1: Trial design Barbervax vaccinated group (1) Recombinant vaccinated group (2) Challenge control group (3) Figure 1: Haemonchus contortus Figure 2: DAY 28 – Antibody response of individual sheep showing early recognition of protein. Best protected indicated by stars Figure 5: FEC graph 250 150 100 50 37 Barbervax Group 250 150 100 50 37 Recombinant Group H11 HgalGP 1 2 3 Three groups of crossbred lambs were divided into groups of 7 and vaccinated subcutaneously at Day 0 and Day 28 of the trial with either Barbervax vaccine (1); recombinant vaccine (2) or adjuvant only, Quil A (3). The lambs were challenged with larvae at Day 28 and sera and FECs taken regularly throughout the trial until Day 55 when post morten was completed. Figure 3: DAY 35 – Significantly increased response of Barbervax group & recognition of H11 by sheep 24 in the recombinant group (arrows) References Bassetto, C.C. & Amarante, A.F.T. (2015) Vaccination of sheep and cattle against haemonchosis. Journal of Helminthology, 89, Piedrafita, D.P., De Veer, M.J., Sherrard, J., Kraska, T., Elhay, M. & Meeusen, E.N. (2012) Field vaccination of sheep with a larval-specific antigen of the gastrointestinal nematode Haemonchus contortus confers significant protection against an experimental challenge infection. Vaccine, 30, Acknowledgements With thanks to British Society of Parasitologists for the travel award funding Funded by University of Glasgow Industrial Parternship PhD scheme with Moredun Scientific 250 150 100 50 37 Barbervax Group 250 150 100 50 37 Recombinant Group H11 HgalGP


Download ppt "Understanding protective immunity to Haemonchus contortus to aid development of a recombinant vaccine Eve Hanks1, Alexa Brett Roberts1, David Smith2, George."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google