Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Institutions National Judiciary.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Institutions National Judiciary."— Presentation transcript:

1 Institutions National Judiciary

2 American Legal System Criminal Law Cases
An individual violating a specific law Varying degrees of crimes based on intent Misdemeanor Less serious crime; less than 1 year incarceration; fines Felony More serious crime; more than 1 year incarceration Beyond a reasonable doubt Civil Law Cases Involving a perceived violation of civil rights or legal relationships i.e. contracts Lawsuits Class action involves a one or a few representing many affected Preponderance of evidence

3 Participants Litigants Plaintiff – brings up charges, sues
Burden of proof Defendant/respondent – answering charges Lawyers Prosecution – government lawyers accusing of criminal charges Public defenders – government-paid lawyers for criminally-charged individuals Jury Trial by jury; one may request a bench trial or trial by jury Judge Presides over the case; rules on objections; final ruling; passes sentence Public Audience members, interest groups, relations to litigants

4 Constitutional Structure
Article III establishes the judicial branch United States Supreme Court Congress establishes lower federal courts Judiciary Act of 1789 Also set number of SC justices, position of Chief justice Constitutional Courts District Courts (original jurisdiction) – 1789 Each state has at least one district court 94 district courts Courts of Appeals (appellate jurisdiction) – 1891 13 Courts of Appeals separated by geographic circuits Legislative Courts Agency reviews (taxes, trade, bankruptcy) Not subject to Article III parameters

5 Court of Appeals

6 Jurisdiction Original Jurisdiction Appellate Jurisdiction
Court is the first to hear the case Appellate Jurisdiction Reviewed by a higher/alternate court Supreme Court’s Jurisdiction Original jurisdiction involving cases with ambassadors, foreign ministers, consuls, state is a party Appellate jurisdiction in all other cases From federal district or appeals courts, or state supreme courts involving federal law or Constitution Concurrent Jurisdiction Cases may be tried in state or federal courts

7 Dual Court System Federal Court System State Court Systems
Federal-Question cases Arising under the Constitution, the law of the U.S., and treaties Diversity cases Involving different states or citizens of different states Dual Sovereignty Either state or federal court can review case if both state and federal laws broken State Court Systems State supreme court decisions final law in respective state

8 Federal Judges Serve “during good behavior” – Article III Appointment
Life terms Appointment Not elected hence not directly subject to political pressures President appoints with advice and consent from the Senate Senatorial courtesy Blue slips

9 Nominating a Supreme Court Justice
Presidential appointments politicized Party Affiliation Political Ideology Litmus Test Asking questions about stance on major issues, i.e. abortion Race, Gender, Religion, Region Judicial and Legal Experience and Record Political Acceptability Legal organizations American Bar Association Interest groups U.S. Senate Simple majority required Other justices

10 The U.S. Supreme Court Currently made of 9 justices, including a Chief Justice and 8 associate justices Congress determines the number of justices $217,400 salary for Chief Justice $208,100 salary for Associate Justices

11 The Supreme Court Accepting Cases
Supreme Court Sessions Term begins on first Monday in October Usually ends in June or July Original Jurisdiction and Appellate Jurisdiction Cases involving ambassadors, foreign ministers, consuls, or state a party Most cases based on appellate jurisdiction Very few cases are reviewed by the SC Only a 100 out of 10,000 cases a year Lower court decision stands if SC refuses to hear case Justices may recuse themselves if conflict of interest Writ of Certiorari Petition the Supreme Court to review a lower court decision SC directs lower court to provide all records regarding a case when petitioned for review Rule of Four Four of the nine justices must agree to hear/review a case

12 The Supreme Court Reviewing and Hearing a Case
Case Briefs Written arguments provided to SC prior to oral arguments Cites legal arguments, legal precedents, previous court decisions Amicus curiae brief (friend of the court) Used by interest groups with a vested interest in case providing an additional legal perspective Oral Arguments 30 minutes for each party counsel Justices may ask questions during oral arguments Solicitor General Argues on behalf of the United States

13 The Supreme Court Deciding a Case
Conferences Justices discuss the case on Wednesday afternoons and Fridays Writing Opinions Most opinions written by justice’s law clerks Majority opinion The official opinion of the court, the supreme ruling Outlined by legal reasons Dissenting opinion Justices who disagree with the majority opinion write a dissent outlined by legal reasons Concurring opinion If a justice concurs with the majority but disagrees with the legal reasons

14 Supreme Court History Marshall Court (early 19th century)
Marbury v. Madison (1803) – judicial review; constitutionality of laws and policies Pro-Federalist decisions – expansion of national government power and influence Taney Court (mid 19th century) Scott v. Sanford (Dred Scott decision) (1857) Pro-Democratic decisions – states’ rights and limited government Late 19th Century-Early 20th Century (“Lochner Era”) Wake of 14th Amendment – incorporation Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) – “separate but equal” Pro-business, pro-laissez-faire decisions during Gilded Age/Progressive Era/1920s New Deal (1930s) FDR’s court-packing to save New Deal policies from conservative rulings “the switch in time to save nine” Warren Court (1950s-1960s) Active in civil rights and civil liberties decisions; “most liberal court ever” Brown v. Board of Education, Miranda v. Arizona Burger Court (late 1960s- early 1980s) More conservative regarding rights of defendants Roe v. Wade, Regents of UC v. Bakke Rehnquist and Roberts Courts (late 1980s-2010s) Continues the conservative ideology Planned Parenthood v. Casey, McDonald v. Chicago, Citizens United v. FEC

15 Historic Supreme Court Justices
Chief Justice John Marshall ( ) Marbury v. Madison McCulloch v. Maryland Gibbons v. Ogden Worcester v. Georgia Barron v. Baltimore Joseph Story ( ) Martin v. Hunter’s Lessee Chief Justice Roger Taney ( ) Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge Scott v. Sandford Ex parte Merryman Benjamin Curtis ( ) Cooley v. Board of Wardens Scott v. Sandford (dissent) Stephen J. Field ( ) Pioneer in substantive due process Slaughter-House Cases (dissent) Munn v. Illinois (dissent) John Marshall Harlan ( ) “The Great Dissenter” Plessy v. Ferguson (dissent) Insular Cases (dissent) Lochner v. New York (dissent) Oliver Wendell Holmes ( ) Schenck v. United States Abrams v. United States (dissent) Louis Brandeis ( ) Olmstead v. United States (dissent) Charles Evans Hughes ( , ) Near v. Minnesota Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish Benjamin Cardozo ( ) Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States (dissent) Steward Machine Co. v. Davis

16 Historic Supreme Court Justices
Hugo Black ( ) Korematsu v. United States Engel v. Vitale Gideon v. Wainwright Felix Frankfurter ( ) Baker v. Carr (dissent) William O. Douglas ( ) United States v. Paramount Pictures Griswold v. Connecticut Sierra Club v. Morton (dissent) Robert Jackson ( ) West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (concurrence) Korematsu v. United States (dissent) Chief Justice Earl Warren ( ) Brown v. Board Miranda v. Arizona Suggestions? William Brennan ( ) Baker v. Carr NY Times v. Sullivan Texas v. Johnson Harry Blackmun ( ) Roe v. Wade Furman v. Georgia (dissent) Bowers v. Hardwick (dissent) Chief Justice William Rehnquist ( ) “The Lone Ranger” Roe v. Wade (dissent) United States v. Lopez Anthony Kennedy (1988-Current) Lawrence v. Texas Citizens United v. FEC Obergefell v. Hodges


Download ppt "Institutions National Judiciary."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google