Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Techniques for Improving Quantitative Analysis of Mineral Glasses

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Techniques for Improving Quantitative Analysis of Mineral Glasses"— Presentation transcript:

1 Techniques for Improving Quantitative Analysis of Mineral Glasses
John Donovan Micro Analytical Facility CAMCOR University of Oregon Eugene, OR Michael Rowe Dept. of Geosciences Oregon State University Corvallis, OR (541) epmalab.uoregon.edu

2 Points of Discussion Volatilization effects Na, K
Si, Al Instrument drift Beam drift corrections Intensity drift corrections Spectrometer drift Recipes for Accuracy Standards Acquisition Parameters Re-Peaking Time vs. intensity MAN Backgrounds Standards for Si (silicate vs. glass) Coordination Peak shifts? Beam damage? Charging Effects Water by difference Matrix correction effects Sulfur Peak Shift Mechanisms Peak Shape Changes? Peak Position Changes? Variables (time, current)

3 Standards for Glass Analysis
“Use Glass for Glass” -but why?

4 Something Is Going On!

5 Standards for Glass Analysis
Satellite Lines? Beta Lines?

6

7 Standards and Coordination Effects
Subtle peak shift effects for different silicate minerals Fournelle, 2004, 2005

8 Standards and Beam Damage?

9 Standards and Beam Damage?

10 Or Maybe Charging? Sub surface Charging Effects Cazaux, 2004

11 “Volatile” or Migrating Elements
Correct for Na, K loss and Si and Al gain

12 Change in Intensity Over Time
36% loss 0.6% gain

13 Matrix Effects 24H-1-1 No Volatile Correction, No Water By Difference
John Donovan: Note: SiO2 and Al2O3 values as a function of the corrections Note: changes in matrix corrections and P/B (MAN) Matrix Effects 24H-1-1 No Volatile Correction, No Water By Difference Results in Oxide Weight Percents ELEM: CaO K2O FeO SiO2 MgO Na2O Al2O3 TiO2 P2O O H2O SUM AVER: SDEV: SERR: %RSD: ZCOR: KRAW: PKBG: Gives ~ 4.7% H2O

14 Volatile Correction Matrix Effects
24H-1-1 With Volatile Correction, No Water By Difference Results in Oxide Weight Percents ELEM: CaO K2O FeO SiO2 MgO Na2O Al2O3 TiO2 P2O O H2O SUM AVER: SDEV: SERR: %RSD: ZCOR: KRAW: PKBG: INT%: VOL%: DEV%: Gives ~ 4% H2O

15 Water By Difference Matrix Effects
24H-1-1 With Volatile Correction, Water By Difference Results in Oxide Weight Percents ELEM: CaO K2O FeO SiO2 MgO Na2O Al2O3 TiO2 P2O O H2O SUM AVER: SDEV: SERR: %RSD: ZCOR: KRAW: PKBG: INT%: VOL%: DEV%: Gives 3.4% H2O

16 Instrument Effects Beam Drift Corrections Standard Drift Corrections
Sample Tilt (melt inclusions) Spectrometer Reproducibility

17 Trace Sulfur Accuracy Issues


Download ppt "Techniques for Improving Quantitative Analysis of Mineral Glasses"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google