Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ASSESSMENT OF CORRECTIVE MEASURES PUBLIC MEETING

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "ASSESSMENT OF CORRECTIVE MEASURES PUBLIC MEETING"— Presentation transcript:

1 ASSESSMENT OF CORRECTIVE MEASURES PUBLIC MEETING
York County Class 2&3 Landfills Permits # & # Thursday, November 9, 2017 York County Fire Training Facility 2500 McFarland Road , York, SC

2 MEETING OVERVIEW Presentation: Public comments relevant to the ACM:
Regulatory Background Corrective Measures Assessment Process Site-specific Findings Selection of Remedy The Next Steps Public comments relevant to the ACM: Written comments will be accepted until Thursday, November 23 , 2017

3 MEETING PURPOSE To discuss the results of the Assessment of Corrective Measures (ACM) conducted for the York County Landfill, in accordance with the South Carolina Solid Waste Regulations R Part V Subpart E d

4 WHAT IS THE PROCESS when there is confirmed groundwater impact from a landfill ?
Nature and Extent Determination Risk Assessment Assessment of Corrective Measures (ACM) Selection of Remedy SC Solid Waste Regulations require an ACM be initiated whenever there are confirmed exceedances of GPS.

5 NATURE AND EXTENT Nature of the Contamination:
Identify the contaminants, their source, & their characteristics. Extent of the Contamination: How far and how deep has it migrated? What paths is it following? Where is it expected to go? Groundwater Assessment Plan (GAP) Historical Groundwater data Field Investigations Geology, Hydrology, Geophysics

6 WHAT IS AN ACM? An analysis of the effectiveness of potential corrective measures in meeting the cleanup goal for the site. The cleanup goal is to attain concentrations below the groundwater protection standards. ACM Steps to Exclude or Retain Options: Screening of Technologies & Process Options; Screening of Specific Remedies within Retained Options; Detailed Assessment of Retained Remedies; and Recommendation for Selected Remedy.

7 SC DHEC ACM CRITERIA For each remedial alternative, the ACM must consider: Performance Reliability Ease of implementation Potential impacts: Safety impacts Cross-media impacts Control of exposure to chemicals Time required to begin and complete the remedy Cost of the remedy implementation Institutional requirements: Federal, state, and local permit requirements Other public health requirements that may affect the implementation of the remedy

8 SITE AREAS OF CONCERN Current, Ongoing Corrective Action:
The Lake Area (MNA & Control of LFG) New Areas of Concern: The GAP Area (between the Landfill and Travis Acres) The MW-7 Area (to be added to the Lake Area CAP) Lake Area & MW-7 Area are considered low-risk due to the fact that there are no human receptors within or downgradient of the plume. GAP Area is considered high-risk due to impacted residential wells within or downgradient of the plume.

9

10 SITE AREAS OF CONCERN Current, Ongoing Corrective Action:
The Lake Area (MNA & Control of LFG) New Areas of Concern: The GAP Area (between the Landfill and Travis Acres) The MW-7 Area (to be added to the Lake Area CAP)

11 GAP Area 1,1-DCA in Fractured Bedrock Goals: Protect Residents
Reduce Concentrations Control Migration Constituents of Concern GPS Source 1,1-Dichloroethane (1,1-DCA) 2.8 µg/l RSL Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 5 µg/l MCL

12 GAP AREA ACM

13 GAP AREA ACM

14 GAP AREA ACM

15 GAP AREA ACM

16 GAP AREA ACM

17 GAP AREA ACM

18 GAP AREA ACM

19 GAP AREA ACM

20 GAP AREA ACM

21 GAP AREA ACM

22 GAP AREA ACM

23 GAP AREA ACM

24 GAP AREA ACM

25 GAP AREA ACM Alternative 1 – In Situ Enhanced Bioremediation
Accelerates the natural biodegradation process by injection of nutrients, electron acceptors, and/or microorganisms. Difficult to get efficient contact with contaminants in fractured bedrock. Due to continuing source, reinjections will be needed quarterly.

26 GAP AREA ACM Alternative 2 – In Situ Emulsified Zero-Valent Iron (EZVI) EZVI is composed of food-grade surfactant, biodegradable vegetable oil, water, and nano- or micro-scale iron particles. EZVI is injected into the aquifer to promote degradation of the COCs. Difficult to get efficient contact with contaminants in fractured bedrock. Due to continuing source, reinjections will be needed semiannually.

27 GAP AREA ACM Alternative 3 – Groundwater Extraction with
Pre-Treatment and On Site Discharge (Pump and Treat – P&T) Installation of extraction wells, pumps, piping, holding tank, treatment building, and aeration pond. Ex situ Treatment: Multi-tray air stripper. Disposal: Land application by discharge to a spray aeration pond. Will prevent future migration toward Travis Acres.

28 ESTIMATED COSTS FOR REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES

29 GAP AREA ACM

30 GAP AREA PROPOSED REMEDY
Groundwater Extraction with Pre-Treatment and On-Site Discharge (Pump and Treat – P&T) The most protective of human health. The only technology capable of controlling migration of the plume toward the Travis Acres neighborhood. Proven technology in fractured bedrock aquifers. High initial capital cost but moderate O&M costs make this option more cost-effective over the long-term.

31 Proposed P&T System

32 SITE AREAS OF CONCERN Current, Ongoing Corrective Action:
The Lake Area (MNA & Control of LFG) New Areas of Concern: The GAP Area (between the Landfill and Travis Acres) The MW-7 Area (to be added to the Lake Area CAP)

33 MW-7 Area RISK: Low PCE in Groundwater
Only one COC in exceedance of GPS. Groundwater flow toward landfill, not toward potential receptors. MW-33, MW-51, Langrum Branch Baptist Church well, & Bus Terminal Well = ND. Believed to be due to partitioning of VOCs from LFG to GW, as in the Lake Area. Constituent of Concern GPS Source Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 5 µg/l MCL

34 MW-7 AREA Proposed Remedy
Incorporate the MW-7 Area into the existing Corrective Action for the Lake Area: Monitored Natural Attenuation and Control of Landfill Gas

35 NEXT STEPS York County will receive written public comments over the next 14 days, and will then address all relevant comments. JOYCE will finalize the ACM and Corrective Action Plan (CAP) and submit it to DHEC. Upon DHEC approval of the ACM/CAP, York County will implement the selected remedy.

36 York County Landfill ACM
Submit Written Comments by November 23, 2017 to: Eric Rekitt, Director York County Public Works 220 Public Works Rd. York, SC Phone: (803) DHEC Project Manager: Larry Leblang Phone: (803)


Download ppt "ASSESSMENT OF CORRECTIVE MEASURES PUBLIC MEETING"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google