Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Teaching and Assessing in Competency Based Education Faculty Development Workshop
UCSF Current Development Team: Patricia O’Sullivan, EdD; Erick Hung, MD; Lindsay Mazotti, MD Contributors: Lee Learman MD, PhD; Susan Promes, MD
2
Creative Commons License
Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported You are free: to Share — to copy, distribute and transmit the work to Remix — to adapt the work Under the following conditions: Attribution. You must give the original authors credit (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Noncommercial. You may not use this work for commercial purposes. Share Alike. If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under a license identical to this one. See for full license.
3
Objectives Describe competency based education
Identify promising teaching and assessment practices and strategies for successful implementation Describe the relationship between teaching and assessing competencies and overall program evaluation.
4
Schedule 00 – 0:15 Welcome, Overview and Introductions
0:15 – 0:45 Introduction of Competency 0: :45 Teaching Strategies 1:45 - 2:00 Break 2:00 – 3:30 Assessment Tools 3:30 – 3:45 Implementation and summary 3:45 – 4:00 Performance Assessment & Evaluation Lee will do All facilitate 1 or 2 small groups. Each do a set up for three Teaching Pat Assessment Christy Implementation Lee
5
Competency Based Education
An outcomes based approach to the design, implementation, assessment and evaluation of a medical program using an organizing framework of competencies The unit of progression is mastery of specific knowledge, skills and attitudes
6
Shifting the Paradigm A competency-based system of education requires four components: identifying the outcomes defining performance levels for each competency developing a framework for assessing competencies continuous evaluation of the program to see if it is indeed producing the desired outcomes Away from Flexner. Competence=knowledge.
7
Step 1: Identifying the Outcomes
Determine a competency framework comprised of broad “domains of competence” that, in aggregate, define the desired outcome. Examples: ACGME/ABMS framework and the CanMeds Framework There is a reference called the Physician Competency Reference that outlines 58 competencies in 8 domains. At UCSF we utilize the 6 standard domains of
8
Desired Outcome: Driving A Car
Competency Domains 1. Knowledge traffic laws controls of a car dynamics of the car 2. Skill Physical skill at controlling car Computational skill/process of adaptation 3.Attitude “Professionalism”- Etiquette of driving Self-control, anger management I want to produce someone who can drive a car. What would be the domains of competence needed to drive a car? K, S, A
9
Step 2: Define Performance Levels (Milestones)
Markers of achievement of levels of performance (ability) in a developmental continuum. Can roughly corresponding to stages of progress: novice through expert.
10
Desired Outcome: Driving A Car
Domain of Competence: Knowledge Competency: Traffic laws Milestones: Novice: Proficient: Expert: In the ONE domain of Knowledge, specifically re: Traffic laws
11
Dreyfus Model Dreyfus Model of Skill Acquisition (2004)
12
Desired Outcome: Driving A Car
Domain of Competence: Knowledge Sub competency: Traffic laws Milestones: Novice: Describe common traffic laws in the US Proficient: Identify three main traffic citations in US Expert: Contrast US traffic laws and laws in UK In the ONE domain of Knowledge, specifically re: Traffic laws
13
Step 3: Develop a Framework for Assessment
How do I know if my student can drive a car? Imagine an observable, measurable activity that a driver must be trusted to perform that crosses domains of competence. How do I know if my student can drive? Supervise them first until they are ready to perform without supervision.
14
Step 3: Develop a Framework for Assessment
How do I know if student can drive a car? Responds to unexpected changes on the road (Yields appropriately to a biker in the crosswalk) Manages car on limited access roads (Merges onto a freeway) Parallel parks How do I know if my student can drive? I can test them on the rules of the road OR I can put them through the day to day practice of driving and see how they perform. Supervise them first until they are ready to perform without supervision. EPAs
15
Competency based education means that
Students must complete numerous assessments to demonstrate skills. Students are ranked by proficiency level. Individuals can complete whenever they have demonstrated competency. Students work to achieve at least a minimal level of skill.
16
Which of the following is a competency for US residents?
Interprofessionalism Quality Improvement Professionalism Procedural skills
17
UCSF’s (and ACGME’s) Competency Framework
Medical Knowledge Patient Care Practice Based Learning and Improvement Systems Based Practice Professionalism Interpersonal and Communication Skills ACGME
18
Other Competency Frameworks
CANMEDS Physician Competency Reference Set (also includes interprofessional collaboration and personal & professional development)
19
Which statement best describes the relationship among competencies, milestones and EPAs?
EPAs>competencies>milestones Competencies>milestones>EPAs Milestones>Competencies>EPAs
20
Milestone
21
EPA defined A core unit of work reflecting a responsibility that should only be entrusted upon someone with adequate competencies Olle ten Cate Medical Teacher 2010;32: CONTEXT is key! More specific: Part of essential professional work in a given context Independently executable, within a time frame Leads to recognized output of professional labor Observable and measurable in process and outcome, leading to a conclusion (“well done” or “not well done”) Must require sufficient, specific knowledge, skill and attitude, generally acquired through training Should reflect competencies, important to be acquired Usually confined to qualified personnel only
22
Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs)
EPAs together constitute the core of the profession Make “decisions of entrustment” for “entrustable activity”
23
Viewpoint: Competency-Based Postgraduate Training: Can We Bridge the Gap between Theory and Clinical Practice? ten Cate, Olle; Scheele, Fedde Academic Medicine. 82(6): , June 2007. 2
24
Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs)
EPAs together constitute the core of the profession Make “decisions of entrustment” for “entrustable activity”
25
Programs should document and demonstrate
Learning opportunities in each competency domain Evidence of multiple assessment methods Use of aggregate data to improve the educational program
26
Teaching Strategies 0:45– 1:15 Group Activity – Madness to Methods
1:15 – 1:45 Share Best Method to Objective Match __________________________________________________ Each group nominate one or two “best method to objective match” Use other than Patient care and medical knowledge. Get glossary Identify quietly someone to be the facilitator in each group to make sure people are working through workbook and that they stay on schedule 3 tables of 6-8
27
Playing Method to Madness
Each player receives methods cards equal to the number of players in the game, + one extra (5 players = 6 cards per player). Dealer turns over the first objective card leaving it face up in the table. Each player chooses one methods card from his/her hand that will achieve the teaching objective. A player holding a “wild card” can create a new or use a previously discussed method. Beginning clockwise from the dealer, all players place their chosen methods card face up near the objective card in the center of the table. Each player has one minute to persuade the other players that their teaching method will effectively, efficiently and appropriately achieve the objective. Once all players have presented their “method”, all players vote for the best method for achieving the teaching objective, but cannot vote for themselves. Players receive a point for each vote they receive. The dealer tallies the votes by player and records on a score sheet. The winner is the player with the most votes. Simpson D, Fenzel J, Rehm J, Marcdante K. Enriching Educators' Repertoire of Appropriate Instructional Methods . MedEdPORTAL; Available from:
28
Debrief the Game What were examples of good matches between objective and method? What did you learn from the game? Large variety of teaching methods Some work better than others for a specific objective Match objective and teaching method
29
BREAK
30
Why assess? Whatever we measure, we tend to improve David Leach,
former CEO of ACGME
31
What makes a good assessment tool?
Appropriate for what you are measuring User must know how to use it Assessors trained Learners prepared Monitored results to make sure the tool is working
32
What makes a good assessment of a learner?
Sufficient data Sufficient contact with learner Sufficient sources of information Ability to render a judgment based on the information
33
Miller’s Assessment Triangle
Does Shows How Knows How Knows Record Review Patient Survey 360° Ratings Undercover SPs Observation Video logs Checklists OSCE’s SP’s MCQ’s Checklists Procedure/Case Logs Clinical context-based tests Oral exams Essays What kinds of assessments go along Miller’s pyramid of competence Factual tests Oral exams MCQ’s Essays 52
35
Assessment Tools 2:00– 2:30 Group Activity – Matching Assessment and Objectives 2:30 – 3:00 Share Best Practices __________________________________________________ Play the game again, but this time with assessment cards. Deal each person 4 assessment cards Select one objective-assessment method pair: Why is it a good match? How will assessors be trained? How will data be collected? How frequently will data be collected? ACGME grid is useful but only with caveat about changes of 1, 2, 3 as recommended
36
Learner Evaluation Expectations
Formative An assessment should occur for each learning experience Assessments of competency/milestones reflective of the 6 areas Multiple formats & evaluators (faculty, peers, patients, self, others) Progressive improvement by learner across the continuum Documented At least semi-annual evaluation for residents At end of course/clerkship/rotation Summative Screening Committee review Competency Committee review In other health professions schools?
37
Clinical Competency Committees
Must have a written description of committee responsibilities Review all resident evaluations by all evaluators semi-annually Prepare and assure the reporting of Milestones evaluations of each resident semiannually to ACGME Make recommendations to program director for resident progress (promotion, remediation, dismissal)
39
Reflect on Teaching and Assessing to Evaluate the Program
We will hand out sample workflow documents from Lee Blank work flow sheet
40
Program Improvement Formal systematic evaluation annually
Must monitor and track: Learner performance Faculty development Graduate performance Program evaluations by learners and faculty Must use results to improve the program Written plan of action Reviewed and approved by teaching faculty
41
Review of Objectives Describe competency based education
Identify promising teaching and assessment practices and strategies for successful implementation Describe the relationship between teaching and assessing competencies and overall program evaluation.
42
Performance Assessment Teach for UCSF Certificate
Please complete skills assessment and evaluation to fulfill requirements of the workshop
43
UCSF Resources Glossary of Competencies and Assessments
Evaluation and Assessment for GME Programs UCSF UME Competencies
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.