Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAlfred Shelton Modified over 6 years ago
1
Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram illustrating the process of selection of studies for inclusion in the systematic review. From: How effective are weight-loss interventions for improving fertility in women and men who are overweight or obese? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(6): doi: /humupd/dmx027 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please
2
Figure 7 Forest plot—Intervention versus control: miscarriages for women who became pregnant.
From: How effective are weight-loss interventions for improving fertility in women and men who are overweight or obese? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(6): doi: /humupd/dmx027 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please
3
Figure 8 Forest plot—Intervention versus control: ovulation improvement.
From: How effective are weight-loss interventions for improving fertility in women and men who are overweight or obese? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(6): doi: /humupd/dmx027 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please
4
Figure 2 Forest plot—Pregnancies associated with diet, diet and exercise, orlistat and motivational interviewing versus control. From: How effective are weight-loss interventions for improving fertility in women and men who are overweight or obese? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(6): doi: /humupd/dmx027 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please
5
Figure 12 Forest plot—Intervention versus metformin: women who became pregnant.
From: How effective are weight-loss interventions for improving fertility in women and men who are overweight or obese? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(6): doi: /humupd/dmx027 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please
6
Figure 13 Forest plot—Intervention versus metformin: improvement in ovulation.
From: How effective are weight-loss interventions for improving fertility in women and men who are overweight or obese? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(6): doi: /humupd/dmx027 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please
7
Figure 14 Forest plot—Intervention versus metformin: improvement in menstrual irregularity per irregular menstruating female participant. From: How effective are weight-loss interventions for improving fertility in women and men who are overweight or obese? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(6): doi: /humupd/dmx027 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please
8
Figure 3 Forest plot—Intervention versus control: live births.
From: How effective are weight-loss interventions for improving fertility in women and men who are overweight or obese? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(6): doi: /humupd/dmx027 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please
9
Figure 4 Forest plot—Intervention versus control: natural conceptions.
From: How effective are weight-loss interventions for improving fertility in women and men who are overweight or obese? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(6): doi: /humupd/dmx027 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please
10
Figure 5 Forest plot—Intervention versus control: IVF conceptions.
From: How effective are weight-loss interventions for improving fertility in women and men who are overweight or obese? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(6): doi: /humupd/dmx027 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please
11
Figure 6 Forest plot—Intervention versus control: miscarriages for all participants enroled.
From: How effective are weight-loss interventions for improving fertility in women and men who are overweight or obese? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(6): doi: /humupd/dmx027 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please
12
Figure 10 Forest plot—Intervention versus control: oocytes retrieved per female participant.
From: How effective are weight-loss interventions for improving fertility in women and men who are overweight or obese? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(6): doi: /humupd/dmx027 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please
13
Figure 9 Forest plot—Intervention versus control: improvement of menstrual irregularity.
From: How effective are weight-loss interventions for improving fertility in women and men who are overweight or obese? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(6): doi: /humupd/dmx027 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please
14
Figure 11 Forest plot—Intervention versus control: change in weight (kg).
From: How effective are weight-loss interventions for improving fertility in women and men who are overweight or obese? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(6): doi: /humupd/dmx027 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.