Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram illustrating the process of selection of studies for inclusion in the systematic review. From: How effective are weight-loss.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram illustrating the process of selection of studies for inclusion in the systematic review. From: How effective are weight-loss."— Presentation transcript:

1 Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram illustrating the process of selection of studies for inclusion in the systematic review. From: How effective are weight-loss interventions for improving fertility in women and men who are overweight or obese? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(6): doi: /humupd/dmx027 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

2 Figure 7 Forest plot—Intervention versus control: miscarriages for women who became pregnant.
From: How effective are weight-loss interventions for improving fertility in women and men who are overweight or obese? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(6): doi: /humupd/dmx027 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

3 Figure 8 Forest plot—Intervention versus control: ovulation improvement.
From: How effective are weight-loss interventions for improving fertility in women and men who are overweight or obese? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(6): doi: /humupd/dmx027 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

4 Figure 2 Forest plot—Pregnancies associated with diet, diet and exercise, orlistat and motivational interviewing versus control. From: How effective are weight-loss interventions for improving fertility in women and men who are overweight or obese? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(6): doi: /humupd/dmx027 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

5 Figure 12 Forest plot—Intervention versus metformin: women who became pregnant.
From: How effective are weight-loss interventions for improving fertility in women and men who are overweight or obese? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(6): doi: /humupd/dmx027 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

6 Figure 13 Forest plot—Intervention versus metformin: improvement in ovulation.
From: How effective are weight-loss interventions for improving fertility in women and men who are overweight or obese? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(6): doi: /humupd/dmx027 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

7 Figure 14 Forest plot—Intervention versus metformin: improvement in menstrual irregularity per irregular menstruating female participant. From: How effective are weight-loss interventions for improving fertility in women and men who are overweight or obese? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(6): doi: /humupd/dmx027 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

8 Figure 3 Forest plot—Intervention versus control: live births.
From: How effective are weight-loss interventions for improving fertility in women and men who are overweight or obese? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(6): doi: /humupd/dmx027 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

9 Figure 4 Forest plot—Intervention versus control: natural conceptions.
From: How effective are weight-loss interventions for improving fertility in women and men who are overweight or obese? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(6): doi: /humupd/dmx027 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

10 Figure 5 Forest plot—Intervention versus control: IVF conceptions.
From: How effective are weight-loss interventions for improving fertility in women and men who are overweight or obese? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(6): doi: /humupd/dmx027 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

11 Figure 6 Forest plot—Intervention versus control: miscarriages for all participants enroled.
From: How effective are weight-loss interventions for improving fertility in women and men who are overweight or obese? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(6): doi: /humupd/dmx027 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

12 Figure 10 Forest plot—Intervention versus control: oocytes retrieved per female participant.
From: How effective are weight-loss interventions for improving fertility in women and men who are overweight or obese? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(6): doi: /humupd/dmx027 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

13 Figure 9 Forest plot—Intervention versus control: improvement of menstrual irregularity.
From: How effective are weight-loss interventions for improving fertility in women and men who are overweight or obese? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(6): doi: /humupd/dmx027 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

14 Figure 11 Forest plot—Intervention versus control: change in weight (kg).
From: How effective are weight-loss interventions for improving fertility in women and men who are overweight or obese? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(6): doi: /humupd/dmx027 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please


Download ppt "Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram illustrating the process of selection of studies for inclusion in the systematic review. From: How effective are weight-loss."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google