Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byNorman Arron Dorsey Modified over 6 years ago
1
WHAT IS Msusy? I am grateful to the Organisers for this title! I understand it reflects certain frustration….
2
Mh=125 GeV What has changed on the data side? Stop > 0. 5 TeV
1&2nd > 1.5 TeV GLUINO > ( ) TeV Mh=125 GeV
3
What could have been really realisticly expected?
WHAT CAN WE EXPECT NOW, AFTER LHC 8? LESSONS FOR UV MODEL BUILDING
4
Parameter
5
AMALDI, de BOER, FURSTENAU ‘91
GAUGE COUPLING UNIFICATION AMALDI, de BOER, FURSTENAU ‘91
6
Superpartner mass mass dependence can be
described (in LL approx) by a single effective parameter Tsusy CARENA, SP, WAGNER ‘93 A HINT FOR EITHER HEAVY OR COMPRESSED SPECTRUM BECAUSE…
8
A HINT FOR EITHER HEAVY O(1) TeV OR COMPRESSED SPECTRUM
For instance, for universal gaugino masses at the GUT scale A HINT FOR EITHER HEAVY O(1) TeV OR COMPRESSED SPECTRUM
9
AFTER LEP, IT HAS BEEN ALWAYS O(1) TEV SCALE FOR
THE 3rd GENERATION
10
Mh=125 GeV PRE-LHC LANDSCAPE
PRECISION FITS IN THE SM (ESSENTIALLY APPLICABLE to MSSM) LEP LIMIT INDUSTRY TO GET MORE THAN 130 (NMSSM, SPLIT SUSY, NEW PARTICLES…)
12
= 3 LESSONS FROM BEST FOR THE HIGGS MASS: „ MAXIMAL MIXING”
WE ARE BOTHERED BY ABOUT O(5 GeV) „TOO HIGH” MASS IN MSSM WITH Msusy=1 TeV, LARGE LEFT-RIGHT STOP „MIXING” NEEDED (BETTER POSITIVE THAN NEGATIVE) NMSSM?
13
NMSSM AS A SOURCE OF O(5 GeV) CORRECTION?
MIXING EFFECTS (BADZIAK, OLECHOWSKI,SP) MEDIUM AND LARGE
15
THIS IS WHY ONE NEEDS HEAVY STOPS IN CMSSM
BACK TO MSSM BEST FOR THE HIGGS MASS: „ MAXIMAL MIXING” GENERIC PREDICTION IN CMSSM: THIS IS WHY ONE NEEDS HEAVY STOPS IN CMSSM
17
EXPLANATION: RG RUNNING FROM GUT
18
IN HIGH SCALE SUPERSYMMETRY BREAKING MODELS
THREE WAYS TO GET „MAXIMAL MIXING” IN THE MSSM LARGE in GENERALIZED LOW SCALE GAUGE MEDIATION ( ROBERT ZIEGLER CAN SAY MORE) IN HIGH SCALE SUPERSYMMETRY BREAKING MODELS 2) (CMSSM, NUHM, SO(10)) STUART RABY, HOWIE BAER TALK
19
THE HIGH SCALE ( CAN BE SMALL OR EVEN ZERO),
3) WITH INVERTED HIERARCHY FOR SFERMION MASSES AT THE HIGH SCALE ( CAN BE SMALL OR EVEN ZERO), (BADZIAK ET AL., NILLES ET AL.) AS A CONSEQUENCE OF 2 LOOP EFFECTS IN BOTH CASES ONE OBTAINS INVERTED HIERARCHY AT THE ELECTROWEAK SCALE! MAXIMAL MIXING INVERTED HIERARCHY ?
22
HINTS FOR INVERTED SFERMION MASS HIERARCHY
ALSO FROM FLAVOUR PHYSICS
23
WITH FLAVOUR U(2) GLOBAL SYMMETRY
EARLY PAPERS : WITH FLAVOUR U(2) GLOBAL SYMMETRY 3rd generation of sfermions can be light, 1st and 2nd can be heavier, to reconcile naturalness with FCNC constraints Dine, Leigh, Kagan ’93 Pomarol, Tommasini ’95 Barbieri, Davali, Hall ’96 Barbieri, Hall, Romanino ’97
24
WITH ANOMALOUS U(1) (GAUGED) FLAVOUR SYMMETRY
Fermion mass model-motivated „inverted hierarchy” of sfermion spectrum (follows from fermion hierarchy) Dudas, SP, Savoy ’95 Dudas, Grojean, SP, Savoy ’96 Nelson, Wright ’97 F-TERM AND D-TERM CONTRIBUTION TO SFERMION MASSES; TWO SCALES IF D-TERM SUPERSYMMETRY BREAKING
25
O(1) TeV stops and inverted hierarchy in the sfermion spectrum?
LET’S BE AMBITIOUS AND TRY TO EXPLAIN THE FERMION MASS SPECTRUM New sources of FCNC and CP violation are controlled by the proposed theory of fermion masses; FCNC problem is usually substantially ameliorated. O(1) TeV stops and inverted hierarchy in the sfermion spectrum? 4
26
„GOOD” FERMION MASS MODELS HINT TO INVERTED SFERMION MASS HIERARCHY, IF STOPS ARE TO REMAIN LIGHT
SU(2)xU(1) DUDAS, von GERSDORFF, SP, ZIEGLER D-TERM MASS SPLITTING BETWEEN SFERMION FAMILIES AT HIGH SCALE
27
UV PICTURE STRUCTUREFUL SOFT TERMS AT UV ? SEVERAL SCALES?
28
MODELS FOR STRUCTUREFUL SOFT TERMS AT UV
SEVERAL SOURCES OF SUPERSYMMETRY BREAKING SINGLET AND NON-SINGLET F-TERMS (CHARGED UNDER SM AND/OR FLAVOUR GAUGE GROUPS) GRAVITY + ANOMALY MEDIATION (COMPRESSED GAUGINO SPECTRUM-GAUGE COUPLING UNIFICATION, NILLES ET AL GEOMETRICAL SEQUESTERING- INVERTED HIERARCHY D-TERM BREAKING
29
SUMMARY AFTER LHC 8 Msusy (DEFINED AS THE AVERAGE STOP MASS) CAN WELL STILL BE AROUND 1 TeV. INVERTED HIERARCHY IN SFERMION MASSES AT THE ELECTROWEAK SCALE SUGGESTED BY THE HIGGS MASS AND FLAVOUR HINTS FOR SOME STRUCTURES IN SOFT TERMS UV COMPLETIONS CAN EASILY ACCOMODATE SUCH STRUCTURES
30
END
31
Precision of the FCNC and CP violation data
leaves little room for new effects from physics BSM. With anarchical flavour structure, for one gets
33
E.g. K-K mixing suppression scale loop factor U - CKM matrix 3
34
MAIN MESSAGE FROM THE LHC ON THE SUSY
SPECTRUM: LIMITS ON THE GLUINO MASS? IT FEEDS UP INTO SEVERAL OTHER „PLACES” FCNC (EASED) RG RUNNING IN UV COMPLETIONS
36
U(1)
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.