Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Eun-Joo Kim University of Kansas For the BRAHMS collaboration

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Eun-Joo Kim University of Kansas For the BRAHMS collaboration"— Presentation transcript:

1 Eun-Joo Kim University of Kansas For the BRAHMS collaboration
System and Rapidity Dependence of Baryon/Meson Ratios at RHIC Eun-Joo Kim University of Kansas For the BRAHMS collaboration August 4-9, Quark Matter 2005

2 Outline The BRAHMS experiment p/p ratios for different centrality bins
p/p ratios for different systems p/p ratios at different rapidities Summary August 4-9, Quark Matter 2005

3 Broad RAnge Hadron Magnetic Spectrometers
AuAu, CuCu, pp sNN= 200 GeV MRS at 90o (y=0) and full FS data at 4o (h~3.2) PID by TFW2, C4, RICH August 4-9, Quark Matter 2005

4 Particle Identification
MRS TFW2 FS RICH C4 TFW2 : p/K ~ 2.5 GeV/c, K/p ~ 4.0 GeV/c with 2s cut C4 : p/K ~ 9 GeV/c RICH : p/K ~ 25 GeV/c, p ~ 35 GeV/c August 4-9, Quark Matter 2005

5 Centrality dependent pbar/p- ratios
Increase from peripheral to central in AuAu at sNN = 200 GeV Ratio for peripheral AuAu approaches to pp Ratios at forward rapidity turn over at lower pT than midrapidity BRAHMS Preliminary No Anti-Lambda Feed-Down Correction! Errors are statistical only… pp at y~0 : PHENIX preliminary August 4-9, Quark Matter 2005

6 p/p increases with system size
+ - August 4-9, Quark Matter 2005

7 Comparison of AuAu & CuCu
pbar/p- ratios are similar for different collision systems, and for a comparable number of binary collisions at y~0 and h~3.2 August 4-9, Quark Matter 2005

8 p/p ratios in CuCu collisions
+ + - - Centrality dependence for p/p+ ratios is stronger at h~3.2 than y~0, but pbar/p- shows only slight centrality dependence at both rapidities. August 4-9, Quark Matter 2005

9 p/p+ ratios vs. <Npart> in CuCu
p/p+ ratio integrated over 1.5<pT<2.5 GeV/c at forward rapidity increase with centrality; smaller dependence seen at midrapidity August 4-9, Quark Matter 2005

10 Rapidity and <Npart> dependence
Strong rapidity dependence Y=0 h~3.2 pp pp August 4-9, Quark Matter 2005

11 Recombination & Coalescence
Recombination and parton coalescence model describe ratios at midrapidty and suggest radial flow August 4-9, Quark Matter 2005

12 <pT> vs. rapidity and centrality
AuAu sNN= 200 GeV y~0 Point : BRAHMS AuAu Curve : 3D Hydro (Hirano) Histo : AMPT PRC72,014908(2005) <pT> decrease with y : p ~ 10%, p ~ flat from y=0 to y~3 AMPT and 3D-Hydro model under-predict <pT> 3D-Hydro describe y-dependence qualitatively with a single Tth value (Tth = 100 MeV, Tch = 170 MeV) August 4-9, Quark Matter 2005

13 3D-Hydro Model for AuAu BRAHMS Preliminary PHENIX : PRC69,034909(2004) - p/p+ enhanced at forward rapidity, mainly from projectile? - Still high - Cronin, recombination, or flow? - The hydro calculation shown does not consider baryon nor isospin chemical potentials: There is no rapidity dependence. - Particle ratio is fixed at chemical freezeout temperature August 4-9, Quark Matter 2005

14 Summary BRAHMS has studied the pT/centrality/rapidity/system
dependence of the p/p ratios for AuAu, CuCu and pp - p/p ratios are enhanced in AA collisions compared to pp - No other system dependence is observed - p/p+ and pbar/p- ratios show similar interplay between soft and hard processes for different systems - However, there is strong rapidity dependence (baryo-chemical potential?) (p/p ratio)/<Npart> at constant h independent of system August 4-9, Quark Matter 2005

15 The BRAHMS Collaboration
I.Arsene9,11, I.G. Bearden6, D. Beavis1, S.Bekele10, C. Besliu9, B. Budick5, H. Bøggild6 , C. Chasman1, C. H. Christensen6, P. Christiansen6, R.Clarke9, R.Debbe1, J. J. Gaardhøje6, K. Hagel7, H. Ito1, A. Jipa9, J. I. Jordre8, F. Jundt2, E.B.Johnson10, J.I.Jordre8, C.Jørgensen6, R. Karabowicz3, E. J. Kim10, T.M.Larsen6, J. H. Lee1, Y. K.Lee4, S.Lindal11, G. Løvhøjden2, Z. Majka3 , M. Murray10, J. Natowitz7, B.S.Nielsen6, D.Ouerdane6, R.Planeta3, F. Rami2, C.Ristea6, O.Ristea9, D. Röhrich8, B. H. Samset11, S. J. Sanders10, R.A.Sheetz1, P. Staszel3, T.S. Tveter11, F.Videbæk1, R. Wada7, H.Yang8, Z. Yin8, and I. S. Zgura9 1Brookhaven National Laboratory, USA 2IReS and Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, France 3Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland 4Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA 5New York University, USA 6Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark 7Texas A&M University, College Station. USA, 8University of Bergen, Norway 9University of Bucharest, Romania 10University of Kansas, Lawrence,USA 11University of Oslo, Norway 48 physicists from 11 institutions August 4-9, Quark Matter 2005

16 Corrections in AuAu August 4-9, Quark Matter 2005

17 Net-p distributions? PRL90,102301(2003) Dynamics for Baryon/Meson is similar to p/p+ and pbar/p-? August 4-9, Quark Matter 2005

18 p/p+ ratios on Ncoll August 4-9, Quark Matter 2005

19 August 4-9, Quark Matter 2005

20 August 4-9, Quark Matter 2005


Download ppt "Eun-Joo Kim University of Kansas For the BRAHMS collaboration"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google