1. DINAS PENDIDIKAN KAB. SUKABUMI 2012
World School Debating Championship (WSDC) Australasian Parliamentary English Debate System PONPES ALMASTURIYAH, JUNI 2012
DINAS PENDIDIKAN KAB. SUKABUMI
2012

2. Definition
A formal method of interactive and representational argument.
Consist of two teams debating over an issue, more commonly called a topic or proposition or motion
Encouraged in high schools and colleges

3. A means of encouraging critical thinking.
The Advantages
A means of encouraging critical thinking.
A means of personal expressions.
Tolerance of others' opinions.

4. Formation Chair Person Time Keeper Negative Team Affirmative Team
Adjudicators

5. Wsdc system Affirmative: 1st Speaker 2nd Speaker 3rd Speaker
Reply Speaker
Negative:
1st Speaker
2nd Speaker
3rd Speaker
Reply Speaker

6. Speech Delivery Substantive Speech: 1st Speaker : 4 minutes
2nd Speaker : 4 minutes
3rd Speaker : 3 minutes
Reply Speech:
2 minutes

7. Affirmative (“The Government”)
Has the right to define the motion.
Support it with constructive arguments.

8. Negative (“The Opposition”)
Oppose the motion defined by the Affirmative.
Build a counter-case against the Affirmative.
Challenge the definition if invalid only.

9. Good argumentation Relevance Organization Consistency & internal logic
Clarity
Effective use of evidence

10. Rebuttal
The process of proving that the opposing team’s arguments should be accorded less weight than its claim.
Showing how & why the opposition’s arguments are invalid.

11. Rebuttal: The arguments are…
Based on a wrong of facts/ interpretation of facts.
Irrelevant to the topic.
Illogical.
Involving unacceptable implications.

12. Role of the First Speaker
Affirmative:
Defines the motion.
Presents the team’s theme line  why the case is logically correct.
Outlines the team split.
Delivers 1st substantial argument.
Provide a brief summary of the case.

13. Role of the First Speaker
Negative:
Accepts/challenges the definition.
Rebut 1st affirmative’s arguments.
Presents the theme line.
Outlines the theme split.
Delivers 1st substantial arguments.
Provides a brief summary.

14. Role of the Second Speaker
Affirmative:
Rebuts the 1st negative’s arguments.
Restates the affirmative team’s case.
Delivers 2nd substantial speech.
Provides a brief summary.

15. Role of the Second Speaker
Negative:
Rebuts the two affirmative speakers.
Restates the team’s case.
Delivers the 2nd substantial arguments.
Provides a brief summary.

16. Role of the Third Speaker
Affirmative:
Rebuts the two negative speakers.
Restates the theme line & the two speakers’ arguments.
Summarizes the issues of the debate.

17. Role of the Third Speaker
Negative:
Rebuts all three affirmative speakers.
Restates the theme line & the two speakers’ arguments.
Summarizes the issues of the debate

18. Reply Speakers Provide an overview of the debate.
Identify the issues by both sides.
Provide a biased adjudication of the debate.

19. Adjudication The process of determining which team wins the debate.
Matter: 40
Manner: 40
Method: 20

20. Matter (40 out of 100 marks)
The matter category assesses the content of a speech and of the team’s case overall. It includes the arguments used to build up the team’s own case and prove their case line and the rebuttal of the opposing team’s case. Ideally a speaker should have a range of arguments that are not internally contradictory and each of these arguments should be illustrated and backed up by examples. A speaker should also demonstrate the ability to priorities material according to its strength.

21. A speaker who performs well in the matter category will usually:
Have several arguments to support the team’s case and emphasis each argument in accordance with its strength and importance in the debate.
Back the arguments up with examples that are NOT drawn from personal experience.
Ensure that all arguments presented by the team are consistent, ie that there is no contradiction between different lines of argument used by the team.
Avoid debating by listing a string of examples to prove your case.
Display an understanding of what the team needs to establish in order to win the argument (eg is the debate a cost-benefit analysis? one where two different models must be compared?)
Demonstrate an ability to adapt and alter pre-prepared material to take into account the other team’s interpretation of the topic and the direction the debate takes as it progresses.
Introduce or reinforce points that have been or will be made by other members of the team.
Display good general knowledge of the topic area.
Identify and rebut the major themes of the other team’s case. Attempt to attack the foundations of the other team’s arguments, as opposed to just rebutting by listing counter- examples.
Defend the team’s case from attack by the opposition, ideally by contrasting the different approaches of the team to each issue and explaining why your team’s approach is superior.

22. Manner (40 out of 100 marks)
Points awarded under the heading of manner are designed to assess how effectively each speaker presented his or her speech and engages with the audience. Manner is therefore extremely important. Unfortunately, students often fail to appreciate its significance and weight in the marking scheme. There is no ‘right’ way of presenting a speech, as the manner category is deliberately flexible enough to encourage and reward individual style. Debaters are encouraged to experiment with different styles of presentation, including within a single speech. Some students may wish to use humour, passion, sincerity and alike to effectively communicate their speech.
Factors such as vocal style, eye contact, gestures and the use of palm cards are also relevant to manner.

23. Generally, speakers who score well in MANNER often:
Speak articulately so the audience can easily
comprehend the speech.
Use palm cards (text) minimally.
Not use slang words too much, overly technical jargon
or pompous language.
Vary the pace of delivery during their speech to add
contrast between points.
Vary the tone of voice during their speech to create
different moods.
Maintain steady eye contact with all members of the
audience.
Use gestures, while not being overly repetitive.
Assume a standing position that is not distracting. For
instance, continuous pacing may be distracting for the

24. Method (20 out of 100 marks)
The method category marks the way in which each speaker structures and organizes their speech. It also takes into account how a team performs as a whole in structuring and organizing their case. Introducing elements such as internal case structure and sensible time management aids the audience and the adjudicator to comprehend and follow each individual speech and team case as a whole.
At the higher levels of competition it is expected that teams will take a thematic approach to the topic, rather than a mere collection of independent points. Teams that score well in the method category also respond and adapt to the development of the debate. This may involve making strategic decisions, such as choosing to emphasize one point over a weaker point. It is also important that speakers who appear later in the debate reinforce points established earlier by their team.

25. A speaker who scores well in the METHOD category will usually:
Define the topic of the debate (if affirmative). This may involve identifying the burden of proof or perhaps setting a test which the team must fulfill to establish their case.
Refer back to a central theme that underpins their team case.
Adhere to a case split provided by the first speaker. The division of substantial material between the first and second speakers should be sensible and effective.
Logically and smoothly progress through each idea, taking care to introduce each new point.
Make full use of the available time, while not exceeding the time limit by more than 30 seconds.
Divide this time wisely between rebutting all major points of the opposing team's case and thoroughly establishing each substantial point.
A firm conclusion of their speech and the team case as a whole.
Keep within the parameters of the speaker's role.

26. ROLES OF SEDC 2012
SMA/SMK 1. Pada babak awal (pre-elemenary round) untuk babak kedua dengan sistem scoring (big sixteen) dengan single adjudicator 2. Pada babak ke-2 s.d. final, Big Sixteen akan dipertandingkan untuk mendapatkan Big Eight dengan sistim GUGUR; 3. Pengundian motion untuk babak 1 dilaksanakan pada saat Technical meeting, babak ke-2 sehari sebelum tampil, babak semifinal & final dilaksanakan 1 jam sebelum bertanding

27. POI (Point of information)
WSDC Sistem menggunakan PoI (Point of Information)
PoI dilakukan saat regu lawan sedang menyampaikan Subtantive Speech
Waktu PoI adalah : menit 2-3 (untuk 1st and 2nd speaker
Menit kedua untuk 3rd speaker
Peserta yang ingin PoI harus minta izin pada regu lawan (dengan mengangkat tangan), dan boleh berbicara setelah dipersilahkan
Regu yang di PoI boleh menerima atau menolak PoI
PoI memiliki nilai tersendiri dalam debat (kebijakan juri)

28. Motion
KLIK DISINI

29. SKEMA LOMBA
CLICK HERE

30. HAPPY DEBATING!!!