Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Renewing the Sectional Struggle: 1848-1854
Chapter 18
2
A. Popular Sovereignty Panacea
Allow people in individual territories to make decisions about slavery Didn’t advocate all-out ban as free-soilers did In line with democratic traditions *Not good enough for abolitionists- slavery could spread
3
B. Political Triumph for General Taylor
Election of 1848 Whigs- General Zachary Taylor Democrats- Lewis Cass Free-Soil Party Against slavery b/c of competition w/ white jobs Taylor won- war hero who took no stance on slavery
6
C. Californy Gold 1848- Gold discovered in CA Huge population increase
Lawlessness 1849- asked for statehood- free state
8
D. Sectional Balance & the Underground Railroad
CA, UT, & NM all potential free states South worried about sectional balance Underground railroad
10
E. Twilight of the Senatorial Giants
CA’s application for statehood- possibility of secession in 1849
11
Henry Clay, Daniel Webster, John C. Calhoun
Clay- both North & South make concessions Calhoun- give southern/slaveowning rights Urged concessions to South *most northerners didn’t want South to secede- would cost them too much money
12
F. Deadlock & Danger on Capitol Hill
“Young Guard”- purify the union William Seward- NY- no concession for South President Taylor against concessions for South He didn’t want states to have power Seemed like Civil War could erupt in 1850
13
G. Breaking the Congressional Logjam
Taylor died during debate- Millard Fillmore took over- more open to concessions for both sides
14
7 months of debate led to a series of compromises called Compromise of 1850
Seemed to be accepted in North Southern “fire-eaters” still against it Cooler heads in South prevailed & south accepted compromise
15
H. Balancing the Compromise Scales
The Compromise of 1850 CA admitted as free state UT & NM territories allowed to use popular sovereignty to determine slavery status TX/NM border dispute settled- territory would go to NM, but TX compensated $10 mil. Slave trade banned in DC Tough fugitive slave law of 1850 enacted Fines & jail terms for those helping slaves Judges paid more to convict fugitives than to acquit them
18
Comp of 1850 “Omnibus” bill doesn’t pass
S. Douglas – engineers passage – how?
19
H. Cont. North clear winner Fugitive slave law most important issue
Moderates to abolitionists Underground Railroads operations increased Personal liberty laws North hated it, wouldn’t enforce it, South resented northerners for this Compromise allowed north time to strengthen
20
Webster’s 7th of March Speech
Supporting national unity
21
The Case of Anthony Burns
23
I. Defeat & doom for the whigs
Election of 1852 Democrats- Franklin Pierce Expansion, Compromise of 1850 Whigs- Winfield Scott Compromise of 1850 Pierce won End of Whigs End of NATIONAL Parties (sectional)
25
Pierce and His “Doughfaces”
Determined to enforced Fugitive Slave Act (Burns case)
26
J. Expansionist Stirrings South of the Border
Fate of Central America Trans-american canal? Nicaragua- William Walker
27
Cuba- Polk had tried to buy it
Tried twice to take it over Ostend Manifesto 1855 Pierre Soule, James Buchanan, John Mason
29
K. The Allure of Asia Trade with China- July
30
1852-1854- Pierce sent Commodore Matthew Perry to open trade with Japan
Meiji Restoration
31
L. Pacific Railroad Promoters & the Gadsden Purchase
Desire for transcontinental railroad- Southern route Made Gadsden Purchase for $10 million
32
M. Douglas’s Kansas Nebraska Scheme
Senator from Chicago- wanted a northern transcontinental Railroad route
33
Proposed organizing northern territory so Railroad could run through it- Kansas in South, Nebraska in North Slavery issue would be solved based on popular sov.
40
Believed it wouldn’t be a big issue
KS would become slave, NB would become free Contradicted MO comp. line Southerners took bait, free-soilers against this
41
N. Congress Legislates a Civil War
No way to avert civil war Repealed MO Comp. Drew up the passions of millions of Americans & would make future compromise impossible
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.