1. XXXXX School District Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project:
Instructional Framework Selection

2. Background
The Purpose The Law The Timeline

3. Washington State Law Senate Bill 6696 Senate Bill 5895
Race to the Top application
2009 Legislation to put a new evaluation system in place for teachers and principals
Changed criteria, moved from 2 tiers to 4 tiers, changed provisional status from 2 year to 3 years, and required submission of educator evaluation data to OSPI
Created pilots to put this into practice
Senate Bill 5895
2012 Legislation
Requires all Districts to adopt and implement new teacher and principal evaluation systems no later than September 2013
Identified 3 ‘preferred’ Instructional Frameworks
Provided language to the 4 tiers (unsatisfactory, basic, proficient, distinguished)
Added language about multiple measures and summative scoring (to be done by
Added language about evaluation results being used for HR decisions by

4. Three Frameworks to Consider
Charlotte Danielson’s
Frameworks for Learning
Robert Marzano’s
Teacher Evaluation Model
University of Washington’s Center for Educational Leadership
Five Dimensions Plus

5. Actions by Leadership Team
: : :

6. Analysis: Research Base
Evidence: Decision:

7. Professional Development Opportunities
Evidence: Decision:

8. Cost of Implementation
Evidence: Decision:

9. Match with District Context
Evidence: Decision:

10. Simplicity/Complexity of Framework
Evidence: Decision:

11. Ease of Communicating to all Stakeholders
Evidence: Decision:

12. Additional Resources to Implement
Evidence: Decision:

13. Leadership Team Decision?

14. Suggested Next Steps