1. CNS/ATM SEMINAR/WORKSHOP ON INSTITUTIONAL AND ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS
RLA/98/003
CNS/ATM SEMINAR/WORKSHOP ON INSTITUTIONAL AND ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS
Tegucigalpa, Honduras
3O September – 4 October 2002
Paulo I. Hegedus
Institutional Aspects Consultant

2. CNS/ATM SEMINAR/ WORKSHOP
CAR/SAM FASID
Guidelines on Multinational facilities/services
Institutional Issues foreseen in the CAR/SAM Region

3. AGENDA I - Background II - Specific aspects in some ANS structures
III - Guideline for Multinational facilities/services
Institutional Issues foreseen in the CAR/SAM Region
Conclusion

4. BACKGROUND General Planning principles - Access guarantee
10 ANC
General Planning principles
- Access guarantee
- National Plan
- Global Character
- CNS -> ATM
- Progressive Introduction

5. BACKGROUND Implementation Strategy ATM Improvement – Main Flows (18)
– Homogeneous Areas (9)

6. ANS ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES
1. AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES
AIRPORTS
AIR OPERATIONS
2. ANS ORGANIC STRUCTURES
a) National level
Government Department
Autonomous Organism Public Sector
Organization Private Sector

7. ANS ORG. STRUCTURES (CONTINUED)
b) Regional/Sub-regional Level
Decentralized - States
Centralized
State Delegation
International Organisms
Multinational Facilities/Services
Joint Organizations of Fees Collection
Collective Financing Agreements
Private /Concessions

8. GENERAL GUIDELINES
Regional Planning Criteria for the Implementation of Multinational Facilities/Services
RAN CAR/SAM/ Rec. 13/2
GREPECAS Conc. 10/5
Objective
Art. 28
Included in the Regional ANP

9. STEPS TO FOLLOW Proposal - GREPECAS - STATES / GROUP OF STATES
Support - Objective
- Financial Implications
- Management
- Alternative solutions
Evaluation - GREPECAS
States Consultation
Elaboration and amendment proposal - GREPECAS

10. FINANCIAL AND MANAGEMENT ASPECTS
COSTS CHARGED TO STATES
MANAGEMENT
INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS
ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENTS

11. INSTITUTIONAL ASPECTS IN THE CAR/SAM REGIONS
Statement on ICAO Policy for the installation/operation of CNS/ATM Systems
FANS – Institutional orientation principles

12. CRITICAL ASPECTS
Sovereignty and National Security
POLITICAL WILL
Harmonization
Duplication Facilities and Services
Coordination

13. CRITICAL ASPECTS
Planning
Standards
Technical Cooperation
Financing Requirements

14. OPERATIONAL ASPECTS – TECHNICAL ORGANIZATION
Investments magnitude
Operational advantages
Scale economics in facilities/services
Importance for ATM
Implementation of CNS systems with advanced and satellite technologies
ATS provision in large geographical areas

15. COMPARTATIVE STUDY OPTIONS
CNS - REDDIG; AMSS; SBAS
ATM – Regional Centres
ATM; ATFM; Mon. RVSM
AIS Data Banks
MET Facil./Serv.
State Delegation
States
International Organizations
Multinational Facilities/Services

16. COMPARTATIVE STUDY OPTIONS
Facil./Serv. Flight Cal.
Facil./Serv. IAP/PA GNSS
TRG
SAR
JCCA
Joint Organizations of Fees Collection
Collective Financing Agreements
Private/Concessions

17. Administrative Criteria
Institutional
Criteria
Operational Criteria
Technical Criteria
Economical Criteria
Administrative Criteria
Nacional Sovereignty
Operational Security
Maintenance Management
Profitability
Administrative Cost
Nacional
Security
Operational Efficiency
Systems Sharing
Cost
Recovery
Training
Labor Cost
Accesibility
Evolutionary Implementation
Sharing of Resources
Staffing
Coordination

18. COMPARATIVE STUDY Facilities/Services by Options Management and Operation
NA not applicable option: < = 20 ptos.
AWR - applicable with reservation
option: >= 21 ptos < = 30 ptos.
A applicable option >= 31 ptos < = 40 ptos.
HA highly applicable option >= 41 ptos < = 48 ptos.

19. Comparative Study (continued)

20. Comparative Study (continued)
PRIORITY OF OPTIONS FOR FACILITIESS AND SERVICES INSTALLATION
Types of organizations
FACILITIES AND SERVICES
NAC
NAC DEL
PRIVATE
INTL
ORG
Mult
JFARR
COM
REDDIG P5 P3 P4 P2 P1
AMSS
SBAS
ATM
REG. ATM CENTRE P6 P4 P5 P2 P3
REG. ATFM CENTRE P1
REG. AIRSP.SFTY. AG.
AIS
REG. AIS DATA BANK
MET
WAFS REG. MTC.SUPP.AG.
FLT.CAL/GNSS IAP/PA
REG
. FLT.CAL. AG. P1
REG. GNSS IAP/PA AG P4 P3 P2
TRG
REG TRG. MGT. AG P5
SAR
REG.SARSAT MGT.AG. P6
JCCA
REG.JCCA AG.

21. CHARACTERISTICS OF MULTINATIONAL ORGANIZATION OPTIONS
Strong Pts.: CRITICAL CRITERIA (NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY/ SECURITY)
Weak Pts.: OPERATINAL EFFICIENCY/ COORDINATION / INCOME
ADMINISTRATIVE COST

22. Viable Aspects: FLIGHT CALIBRATION
CHARACTERISTICS OF MULTINATIONAL
ORGANIZATION OPTIONS
(cont.)
Viable Aspects: FLIGHT CALIBRATION
TRAINING
SARSAT
JCCR

23. NATIONAL DELEGATION COORDINATION TRAINING HUMAN RESOURCES
Strong Pts.: SECURITY/EFFICIENCY OPERATIONAL
COORDINATION
TRAINING
HUMAN RESOURCES
Weak Pts.: CRITICAL CRITERIA (NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY/ SECURITY);

24. NATIONAL DELEGATION Viable Aspects: SARSAT, MGT. SARSAT,
FLIGHT CAL. MGT.
RVSM Monitoring Agency
REDDIG

25. Private Organizations
Positive Aspects: Operational Efficiency
Economic/Financing Area
Weak Aspects: Critical Criteria (NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY/SECURITY)
Labor Costs
SARSAT;

26. Private Organizations
Viable Aspects: REDDIG
JCCR
WAFS MTC

27. Multinational Org. International Org., JFARR
Positive Aspects: Attend most of the criteria with high degree of viability;
Weak Aspects: Multinational Org. - Administrative Costs Profitability
International Org. Critical criteria
Labor Costs
JFARR - Was not yet tested in a wide context

28. RECOMMENDED OPTIONS HA JFARR MULTINATIONAL ORG. INTERNATIONAL ORG.
A STATES DELEGATION
PRIVATE ORG.
AWR STATES (STATUS QUO).

29. Next Steps
2nd. Phase
- Harmonize and adapt to ATM scenarios (Flow Profiles and States Profiles);
- Propose multinational organizational structures options for the CAR/SAM ANS;
- Sensitivity cost/benefits/analysis studies;
- Business cases.

30. (continued)
3rd. Phase
- Raise the recommended options to Government high instances for the decision making.
POLITICAL DECISION supported by the operational/technical and economic recommended options.

31. CONCLUSION THE OPTIONS ADOPTED SHOULD ATTEND CRITICAL CRITERIA;
THE OPTIONS SHOULD ATTEND THE OPERATIONAL, TECHNICAL AND ECONOMICAL VIABILITY CRITERIA;
THE DECISION WILL BE POLITICAL.
Therefore we should have:
POLITICAL WILL