Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
s a Drought Indices for Zagreb-Grič Observatory
and Drought Damages in Croatia Krešo Pandžić, Tanja Likso Meteorological and Hydrological Service, Grič 3, Zagreb 1. Introduction Drought indices are quatitative indicators of climate variation and change. Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) and Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) were developed for representation of abnormal wetness and dryness conditions by Palmer (1965) and Guttman (1999), respectively. Penzar (1976) and Cindrić et al. (2015) applied both PDSI and SPI, respectively, on secular time series of Zagreb-Grič Observatory, capial of Croatia. A comparison of two indices is considered here as well as a reationship with drought damages in Croatia. 2. Methodology and data PDSI and SPI have been calculated using free software in FORTRAN 77. A slight deviation from orginal Palmer (1965) algorithm for PDSI is an use of Eagleman (1967) algorithm for calculation of potential evapotranspiration. Cited algorithm for PDSI has been applied on mothly scale using monthly precipitation amounts, average mothly air temperature and average air humidity data for Zagreb-Grič Observtory for the period For calculation of SPI for 1-, 2-, 3-, 6-, 9-, 12- and 24-month periods, indicated as SPI1, SPI2, SPI3, SPI6, SPI9, SPI12 and SPI24, only corresponding cumulative precipitation data amounts have been used. Computation of SPI involves fitting a gamma probability density function to a given frequency distribution of precipitation totals for the station considered (McKee et al., 1993; Mihajlović, 2006). 3. Results 9-month period SPI (SPI9) and monthly scale PDSI for Zagreb-Grič Observatory for the period are represented in Figure 1. They have similar time patterns and negative trends, stronger for PDSI because of gobal warming i.e. because of potential evapotranspiration increase (Pandžić et al., 2009). The year 2012 was one of the the driest year since begining obsevation at Zagreb-Grič Observatory what is especialy emphasized in the case of PDSI. Figure 2, representing scatter diagrams between SPI1, SPI9, SPI24 and PDSI, respectively, indicates the strongest similarity between SPI9 and PDSI. Higher time resolution of SPI1, SPI9 and PDSI is shown in Figure 3 for te period Again SPI9 and PDSI express similar patterns although drought periods are more clear emphasised in the case of PDSI than in the case of SPI9. In both cases a high correlation is shown with drought damages for Croatia shown in Figure 4. s a 1 Figure 1. SPI9 and PDSI trends for Zagreb for period Figure 2. Scatter diagrams between SPI1, SPI9, SPI24 and PDSI, for Zagreb, respectively. F Figure 3. SPI1, SPI9 and PDSI for Zagreb for Figure 4. Damages (in Million Euros) due to drought in Croatia during the period 2000–2012 References Cindrić, K., Telišman Prtenjak, M., Herceg Bulić, I., Mihajlović, D. and Z. Pasarić, 2015: Analysis of the extraordinary 2011/2012 drought in Croatia. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, DOI /s Eagleman JR (1967) Pan evaporation, potential and actual evapotranspiration. J. Appl. Meteor. 6: Guttman, N.B., 1999: Accepting the standardized precipitation index: a calcuation algorithm. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 35, McKee T.B., Doeksen, N.J. and J., Kleist, 1993: The relationship of drought frequency and duration of time scales. Proceedings of t the 8-th Conference on Applied Climatology. American Meteorological Society, Anaheim, CA, Boston MA; , January. Mihajlović, D., 2006: Monitoring the 2003–2004 meteorological drought over Pannonian part of Croatia. International Journal of Climatology, 26, Palmer, W. C., 1965: Meteorological drought. U.S. Department of Commerce Research Paper No. 45, Washington D.C. 58 pp. Pandžić, K., Trninić, D., Likso, T. and T. Bošnjak, 2009: Long-term variations in water balance components for Croatia. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 95, Penzar, B., 1976: Drought severity Palmer’s indices for Zagreb and their statistical forecast (in Croatian). Papers and Presentations (Zagreb), 13, 1-58.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.