Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

AT&L Hot Topics in Acquisition

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "AT&L Hot Topics in Acquisition"— Presentation transcript:

1 AT&L Hot Topics in Acquisition
Presentation for DAU 9 August, 2006

2 Acquisition and Technology
Providing Value-Added Oversight and Coherent Strategic Direction for Reduced Cycle Time, Increased Competition and Predictable Performance Examples of Initiatives Concept Decision/Time Defined Acquisition Capital Budgeting Risk-Based Source Selection Defense Acquisition Executive Summary (DAES) IIPT/OIPT/DAB/Portfolio Management Processes Systems of Systems/Centers of Excellence Award/Incentive Fee Policy/FAR/DFAR Δ’s Acquisition of Services Policy Human Capital Strategic Planning Lead Systems Integrator/Spiral Acquisition Industry and Congressional Outreach “THE WILL TO CHANGE…”

3 Concept Decision Toolkit
RISK-BASED SOURCE SELECTION Reducing Risk and Improving Source Selection CAPITAL ACCOUNTS Program Funding Stability TRI-CHAIR CONCEPT DECISION Improved Process Alignment Focused on Department Investment Decision Options Time Defined determinations MS A MS B MS C CD B’ FRP DR Strategic Planning Guidance JCD E O A EOA Rpt CDD CPD Joint Concepts Tech Dev FAA FNA SDD PD O&S CDR OSD/JCS COCOM FCB TIME DEFINED ACQUISITION STRATEGY Multiple Customer-Focused Paths to Speed Fielding of Capability Post-Initiation Stability Initiatives Science and Technology Base Technology Development—TRL/IRL MRL Stronger Emphasis CD Methodology—Broad Acquisition Initiatives

4 Why do Concept Decision?
Accelerate delivery of Joint warfighting capabilities Current process slow to respond to warfighter needs Address resource/funding constraints early Necessary to control cost growth/requirements creep Adequately fund and stabilize funding stream Tailor analysis to support decision at hand Not all programs require extensive, time consuming and costly additional analytical efforts Leverage Service/organizational competencies Delegate execution Minimize oversight Challenge: Maximize Process Change…Minimize Bureaucracy

5 “As Is” Process As Is: Serialized Program-Centric Closed Aperture
Significant Early Service Commitment of Resources Existing Focus Here Concept Decision MS A MS B MS C Full Rate Prod DR JCD ICD CDD CPD Strategic Planning Guidance Joint Concepts A o A System Development & Demonstration Concept Refinement Technology Development Production & Deployment FAA FNA FSA O&S Incremental Development FCB COCOM OSD/JCS Technology Development—TRL/IRL MRL Science and Technology Base

6 New “To Be” Process To Be: Aligned Capability Orientation
Open Aperture Joint Broad Range of Options Future Focus Here Concept Decision MS A MS B MS C Full Rate Prod DR JCD EoA Report CDD CPD Strategic Planning Guidance System Development & Demonstration Joint Concepts E o A Technology Development Production & Deployment FAA FNA O&S Incremental Development FCB OSD/JCS COCOM Science and Technology Base Technology Development—TRL/IRL MRL Stronger Emphasis

7 Concept Decision: Notional Next Layer
JCD sponsor drafts, PA&E approves, Tri-Chair directs CORPORATE TRI-CHAIR INVESTMENT DECISION CCJO, JOCs, JFCs and JICs A B C FCB, COCOM, Service–led Requirements FULL CONOPS Technology Maturity EoA Guidance Affordability CPD Concept Decision Tailored JCD FAA FNA 1 2 3 Time-Defined Acquisition Initial Operational Capability CDD EOA COCOM Service ICD PORTFOLIO Based: Investment Strategy Competitive Solutions Balance Risks Establish Baselines Rapid COCOM/Service/Agency FCB assesses, prioritizes gaps, shortfalls, and redundancies/offsets 0 < Years < 8 BOUNDED SOLUTIONS (I.E. 40 TO 80%)

8 Concept Decision From / To Savings
From FSA + AoA To EoA SavingsMetric 30 Months (min) 6 to 12 months Shorter @ Milestone A or B Left of Milestone A Earlier Fragmented Approval Focused Approval Buy In Single Service Joint/Integrated Choices Performance Driven Trade Off Driven Constraints

9 TIME-DEFINED ACQUISITION STRATEGY MILITARILY USEFUL CAPABILITY
A Customer-Focused Concept that: Enhances system agility Capitalizes on Rapid Acquisition Authority and the Concept Decision Employs a time-sensitive acquisition approach emphasizing Customer Response and designed to provide capability when it is needed Uses three risk-based criteria to determine the Acquisition Strategy: Time to delivery Requirement certainty Technology maturity Rapid requirements Triage via Gatekeeper function inherent in Concept Decision methodology Enhanced by Enabling Actions: Requirements Stability B “Prime” CUSTOMER NEED Rapid Limited Full 6 mo – 2 yrs 2 – 4 yrs 4 – 8 yrs TIME-DEFINED ACQUISITION STRATEGY MILITARILY USEFUL CAPABILITY Our First Priority is to Produce Useful Capability for the Warfighter When Needed

10 Requirements Stability—A Time-Defined Enabler
IMPLIED AND DERIVED REQUIREMENTS UNDERSTOOD BASE KNOWLEDGE OF REQUIREMENT - Key System Attributes DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AWARD MS A MS B MS C CD FRP DR B’ Joint Concepts JCD EOA Rpt Tech Dev CDD CPD SPG FAA FNA EOA SDD PD O&S CDR Rqmts Stabilized OSD/ JCS COCOM FCB Proposed Requirements Stability Potential B “Prime” No changes that may result in additions or extensions to baselined cost or schedule after CDR unless approved by the MDA and Requirements Approving Official If such a change is approved by specified authority, it shall be self-financed and shall NOT impact schedule Default policy should be to defer proposed changes to follow-on increment A logical point, subsequent to Contract Award, where “Implied” and “Derived” requirements are known At System CDR, or “B Prime,” that knowledge is available. There should be a required APB review at this point so we can assess the cost and schedule impact and identify non-value added cost drivers

11 Funding Stability Capital Accounts
MS A MS B MS C CD FRP DR Joint Concepts JCD EOA Rpt Tech Dev CDD SDD CPD SPG FAA FNA EOA PD O&S Funding Stability OSD/ JCS COCOM FCB Capital Accounts A financial initiative designed to provide stability in the budgeting system and to establish accountability for acquisition programs throughout the hierarchy of program responsibility Implements a risk-informed investment strategy reflecting joint warfighter priorities Consistent with the QDR and section 1004(a) of the FY 06 Authorization Act, the Department is exploring capital accounts to stabilize funding for selected major programs Process will be part of the larger risk-informed investment strategy used to inform future investment decisions.


Download ppt "AT&L Hot Topics in Acquisition"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google