Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

What is TeamSTEPPSTM? Evidence-Based Teamwork System

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "What is TeamSTEPPSTM? Evidence-Based Teamwork System"— Presentation transcript:

1 What is TeamSTEPPSTM? Evidence-Based Teamwork System
Background What is TeamSTEPPSTM? Evidence-Based Teamwork System Designed to improve: Quality Safety Efficiency Practical & Adaptable TeamSTEPPS stands for: Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety. Evidence-Based Teamwork System TeamSTEPPS is a teamwork system based on 20 years experience and lessons learned from High-Reliability Organizations (HROs) (for example, military operations, aviation, community emergency response services, and nuclear power industries). These types of organizations have been conducting extensive research on how teams work, what makes them effective and how to enhance their performance. This research is directly relevant to health care because delivering effective care requires teamwork. Designed to Improve Team Effectiveness TeamSTEPPS has incorporated the best practices from this research into a program to improve the quality, safety, and efficiency of health care by improving communication and other teamwork skills. These skills lead to important team outcomes like enabling the teams to: Adapt to changing situations. Have a shared understanding of the care plan. Develop positive attitudes toward and appreciate the benefits of teamwork. Provide more safe, reliable, and efficient care. Practical and Adaptable Designed with input from the medical community, it is an initiative that will work within the daily functioning of our organization (it is practical) and can be customized (adapted) to meet our organization’s needs.

2 Background SAY: Joint Commission data continues to demonstrate the importance of communication and teamwork to patient safety, as they are routinely identified as root causes in reported sentinel events. We also know that there are numerous barriers to overcome to achieve our goals of team performance and effective communication in our workplaces.

3 Key Components Leadership Communication Situation Monitoring
Background Key Components Leadership Communication Situation Monitoring Mutual Support SAY: TeamSTEPPS provides a set of tools and strategies that can help us overcome these barriers. There are four key components of teamwork we’ll cover in this session. Leadership – The ability to coordinate the activities of team members by ensuring team actions are understood, changes in information are shared, and that team members have the necessary resources. Situation monitoring – Process of actively scanning and assessing situational elements to gain information, understanding, or maintain awareness to support functioning of the team. Mutual support – The ability to anticipate and support other team members’ needs through accurate knowledge about their responsibilities and workload. Communication – Process by which information is clearly and accurately exchanged among team members. Within each of these components, we’ll discuss the specific tools and strategies (identified in the yellow box at the right) that can help us achieve these outcomes. Optional: You’ll note that this presentation includes a few references to basketball. UNC’s former Hall of Fame Coach Dean Smith is widely regarded as one of the legends in the sport, responsible for tremendously successful teams and developing basketball teamwork practices that have since been widely adopted as standard practice in the sport and even by business leaders. We find that there are numerous parallels between his teamwork philosophies and the essential components of TeamSTEPPS.

4 Leadership Skills Organize the team Leadership Articulate clear goals Skillful at conflict resolution Empower members to speak up and challenge, when appropriate Make decisions through collective input of members SAY: Team leaders must possess a set of effective skills regardless of the type of team that they lead. Team leaders should be able to effectively: Organize the team Articulate clear goals Make decisions based on input of team members Empower team members to speak up and openly challenge, when appropriate Promote and facilitate good teamwork Resolve conflict Evidence also suggests that effective team leaders are responsible for: Ensuring that team members are sharing information, monitoring situational cues, resolving conflicts, and helping each other when needed Manage resources to ensure team performance Facilitate team actions by communicating through informal exchange sessions Develop norms for information sharing Ensure that team members are aware of situational changes to plans Suggestion for engaging participants; Ask, “Does anyone have an example of a recent experience where either you or another demonstrated these leadership skills? How did that affect the outcome?” Actively promote and facilitate teamwork Teams may have designated leaders or situational leaders, depending on the situation.

5 Any team member can request a brief, huddle, or debrief
Leadership Who is on the team? Understand & agree upon goals? Roles & responsibilities are understood? What is our plan for the day? Availability of resources? Problem solving “Touch-base” when unexpected happens Discuss critical issues & emerging events Anticipate outcomes & contingencies Assign resources Express concerns Celebrate teamwork success & accomplishments What went well or as expected? What didn’t go according to plan or as expected? What could be done better or differently the next time? SAY: Leaders can request the use of these three strategies or tools that can promote teamwork; briefs, huddles and debriefs. As a team member each of you can request a brief, huddle or debrief if the leader has not thought of doing so. We’ll now spend time reviewing the components of each. As in aviation, the briefings before flights provide the ideal forum for building a team dynamic that allows everyone to work together when carrying out both routine tasks and when tackling unexpected problems. Briefs serve the following purposes: They clarify who will be leading the team They open lines of communication among team members, ensuring that everyone can contribute their unique knowledge base to the task. Protocols, responsibilities, and expected behaviors are discussed and reinforced so that possible misunderstandings are avoided They prepare the team for the flow of the procedure, contingency plans, and the means for resolving any unusual circumstances They convey expectations and reduce disruptive or unexpected behaviors Huddles are ad hoc planning events that can be used to reestablish situation awareness; reinforce plans already in place: and assess the need to adjust the plan. Debriefs provide an opportunity for teams to learn and improve in real time. To conduct a debrief after an event, a leader asks questions related to team performance, then summarizes lessons learned and sets any goals for improvement. At UNC we’ve been using 3 simple questions to guide debriefing; “What went well, What didn’t go well, and What can we do differently next time”. Any team member can request a brief, huddle, or debrief

6 Communication Tools Call-out informs all members simultaneously during team events Check-backs use closed-loop communication to verify information SBAR-Q provides a standardized framework for communicating about a situation or patient's condition Communication SAY: Standards of communication are essential for developing teamwork and fostering a culture of patient safety. These tools help to avoid communication breakdowns that lead to patient harm. A call-out is a tactic used to communicate critical information during a team event. Critical information called out in these situations helps the team anticipate and prepare for vital next steps in patient care. It also benefits a recorder when present during a code or emergent event. A check-back is a closed-loop communication strategy used to verify and validate information exchanged. The strategy involves the sender initiating a message, the receiver accepting the message and confirming what was communicated, and the sender verifying that the message was received. SBAR-Q provides a standardized framework for members of the healthcare team to communicate about a patient's condition. It provides members of the team with an easy and focused way to set expectations for what will be communicated and how. In phrasing a conversation with another member of the team, consider the following: Situation—What is happening with the patient? Background—What is the clinical background? Assessment—What do I think the problem is? Recommendation—What would I recommend? Question – Ask the recipient if they have any questions about the information I just shared.

7 Situation Monitoring Actively scanning the situation & environment
Mutual respect Accountability Engage the patient & family when possible Supports cross monitoring “Watch each other’s back” Situation Monitoring SAY: Situation Monitoring is defined as the process of actively scanning behaviors and actions to assess elements of the situation or environment. It enables team members to identify the potential issues or minor deviations early enough so that they can correct and handle them before they become a problem or pose harm to the patient. The benefits of situation monitoring are that it fosters mutual respect and team accountability, and through the process of cross-monitoring provides a safety net for both the patient and the team. Examples of situation monitoring include assessing the patient's condition, noting malfunctioning equipment, and being aware of workload spikes and stress levels among team members. Finally, remember that you should engage the patient and/or family whenever possible. Cross monitoring is used by fellow team members to help maintain situation awareness and prevent errors. Commonly referred to as “watching each other’s back,” it is the action of monitoring the behavior of other team members by providing feedback and keeping track of fellow team members’ behaviors to ensure that procedures are being followed appropriately. It allows team members to self-correct their actions if necessary. Cross monitoring is not a way to “spy” on other team members, rather it is a way to provide a safety net or error-prevention mechanism for the team, ensuring that mistakes or oversights are caught early. When all members of the team trust the intentions of their fellow team members, a strong sense of team orientation and a high degree of psychological safety result. “Coaching is all about adjustments. Your game plan is only good for the first six minutes...” Roy Williams

8 Shared Mental Models Shared perspective of the situation
Regularly exchange information to stay “on the same page” Situation Monitoring SAY: When teams are actively scanning the environment and effectively communicating with one another, they develop a “shared mental model” about the situation. In other words, they are “on the same page” regarding the situation at hand. As you can see in this image, failing to continually assess the situation and communicate within and among teams can lead to unintended and undesirable outcomes.

9 Mutual Support Error vulnerability increases:
under stress when fatigued in high-task situations Foster a climate where assistance will be actively sought and offered SAY: Error vulnerability is increased when people are under stress, are in high-task situations, and when they are fatigued. One of the most important concepts to remember with regard to task assistance is that assistance should be actively given and offered whenever there is a concern for patient safety related to workload. Always remember the focus should be on patient safety rather than the individual’s need or preference for task assistance. We are all vulnerable to making errors under these conditions and no one is “above” or immune from needing assistance at times. To a certain degree, some of us have been conditioned to avoid asking for help because of the fear of suggesting lack of knowledge or confidence. Many people refuse to seek or accept assistance when overwhelmed by tasks. In support of patient safety, however, task assistance is expected. Task assistance may involve asking for assistance when overwhelmed or unsure; helping team members to perform their tasks, shifting workload by redistributing tasks to other team members, delaying/rerouting work so the overburdened member can recover, and/or filling in for overburdened team members when necessary. Mutual Support “There is a real strength derived from depending on one another.” Dean Smith

10 Advocacy and Assertion
Assert a corrective action in a firm and respectful manner Advocate for the patient Use CUS words when appropriate! Concerned, Uncomfortable, Safety issue “Two Challenge Rule” Be persistent and seek help if needed SAY: Advocacy and assertion interventions are invoked when a team member’s viewpoint does not coincide with that of a decision maker. You should respectfully advocate for the patient even when your viewpoint is unpopular, is in opposition to another person's view, or questions authority. You should be persistent and persuasive, providing evidence or data for your concerns. Using the CUS technique provides another framework for conflict resolution, advocacy, and mutual support. “CUS” and other signal phrases are designed to catch people’s attention. When they are spoken, all team members will understand clearly not only the issue but also the magnitude of the issue. First, state your concern, then state why you are uncomfortable. If the conflict is not resolved, state that there is a safety issue and discuss. If the safety issue is not acknowledged, a supervisor should be notified. It is important to voice your concern by advocating and asserting your statement at least twice if the initial assertion is ignored (thus the name, “Two-Challenge rule”). This tactic ensures that an expressed concern has been heard, understood, and acknowledged. If after two attempts the concern is still disregarded, but the member believes patient or staff safety is or may be severely compromised, the Two-Challenge rule mandates taking a stronger course of action or using a supervisor or chain of command. Mutual Support

11 Advocacy and Assertion
Empower all team members to “stop the line” for safety If you are challenged: Pause what you’re doing Listen and take the concern seriously Work to address the concern Preventing errors protects the patient and the team SAY: We want every member of the team to feel empowered to speak up using these techniques to “stop the line” and prevent actions that could lead to patient harm. This is an action that should never be taken lightly, but requires immediate cessation of the process to resolve the safety issue. If you personally are challenged by a team member, it is your responsibility to acknowledge the concerns instead of ignoring the person. Remember – if someone says these words to you, pause what you’re doing and listen/take the concern seriously. We all share responsibility for preventing actions that could lead to patient harm. Being a part of a team means that we also share responsibility for protecting each other from making these kinds of mistakes. Speaking up is a form of mutual support and we should all appreciate anyone willing to help us in this manner, even if it feels uncomfortable or embarrassing in the moment. Suggestion for engaging participants; Ask, “ What’s the worst that can happen if you don’t speak up? “ “What makes speaking up uncomfortable?” “Will speaking up always get the response you are hoping for, if not what do you do?” Mutual Support

12 SAY: The best teams know that teamwork requires trust, hard work, lots of practice, and a commitment to continuous improvement. Teams that practice these TeamSTEPPS tools and strategies will be well-equipped to: Adapt to changing situations Have a shared understanding of the care plan. Develop positive attitudes toward and appreciate the benefits of teamwork. Provide more safe, reliable, and efficient care. Optional: The Hall of Fame Coach of the UNC Tar Heels, Dean Smith explained his teamwork philosophy (Play Hard, Play Smart, Play Together) in a story from his book, “The Carolina Way: Leadership Lessons from a Life in Coaching.” When asked by a fellow coach, “How do you teach your team not to ever give up?,” Coach Smith once said: “We try to execute well on each possession and fall back on our philosophy of playing hard, playing together, and playing smart. We always believe we have a chance if we do those things.” We believe that the “Carolina Way” can also describe how we approach teamwork in our healthcare teams.

13


Download ppt "What is TeamSTEPPSTM? Evidence-Based Teamwork System"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google