Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
eau d’e coli igem 2006: mit
2
meet the team The Undergrads: The Grad Students: The Faculty:
Kate Broadbent Biological Engineering Andre Green Biology / Physics Stephen Payne Veena Venkatachalam Chemistry / Physics Boyuan Zhu Electrical Engineering and Computer Science The Grad Students: Barry Canton Austin Che Jason Kelly Reshma Shetty Samantha Sutton The Faculty: Drew Endy Tom Knight Shrink text
3
motivations eau d’e coli mit igem 2006
Hasn’t been explored much in synthetic bio Put Cool, Regulated biosynthetic devices in e. coli for the registry eau d’e coli mit igem 2006
4
background A. thaliana O. basilicum A. majus C. breweri S. cerevisiae
Started out considering various diff scents; for various reasons, we didn’t do things. evaluated several possibilities; chose one JMT jasmine CCMT cinnamon BAMT fresh / floral BSMT wintergreen ATF1 banana
5
background O. basilicum A. majus C. breweri S. cerevisiae CCMT BAMT
Bold titles on top Show five different pics of diff scents, to show CCMT cinnamon BAMT fresh / floral BSMT wintergreen ATF1 banana
6
background A. majus C. breweri S. cerevisiae BAMT BSMT ATF1
Bold titles on top Show five different pics of diff scents, to show BAMT fresh / floral BSMT wintergreen ATF1 banana
7
background C. breweri S. cerevisiae BSMT ATF1 banana wintergreen
Bold titles on top Show five different pics of diff scents, to show BSMT wintergreen ATF1 banana
8
timeline: initial planning
initial planning • scent production • self-generating scent • production regulation • eliminating indole
9
timeline: scent production
initial planning • scent production • self-generating scent • production regulation • eliminating indole Mention WGD = wintergreen generating device
10
timeline: self-generating scent
initial planning • scent production • self-generating scent • production regulation • eliminating indole
11
timeline: production regulation
initial planning • scent production • self-generating scent • production regulation • eliminating indole Short: Growth dependent regulation
12
timeline: indole elimination
initial planning • scent production • self-generating scent • production regulation • eliminating indole
13
wintergreen generating device
Once again….redundant titles?
14
device generates wintergreen
methyl salicylate MW = 152 no methyl salicylate [no peak at 9.1 minutes] E. coli E. coli + precursor (SA) + WGD Fix titles
15
banana generating device
16
precursor biosynthesis
Fix arrows
17
precursor biosynthesis
Mention: we put these devices together w/ WGD and BGD, and found that they expressed the scent without exogenously adding precursor
18
goal: the regulated system
Pcred out of e. coli; added to registry
19
growth dependent regulation
osmY: active in stationary phase & under high osmotic pressure conditions Reason for regulation: smell when cultures are done osm Y osmY + inverter
20
regulation is growth dependent
Tested it using fluorescent protein techniques
21
regulation is growth dependent
Tested it using fluorescent protein techniques
22
regulated system: exponential
Arrow going to chorismate from inside the cell; methyl salicylate and isoamyl acetate out of the cell (no arrows to banana and mint smell) Corner box: graph
23
regulated system: stationary
IT WORKED Same phrase: “we designed this part, constructed it, tested it, proved that it worked, and added it to the registry”
24
regulated system Haven’t verified if it’s correct; but we’ve tested all the individual parts
25
chassis (tnaA5-) does not produce indole
No indole [no peak at 10 minutes] Indole Peak at 10 minutes MW = 117 wild type E. coli chassis: tnaA5- E. coli Mention yale genomic stock center strain # Rename: wild type e. coli and “chassis: [name of strain] e. coli”
26
final system Change title of cell to indole-deficient
Get rid of title of indole knockout chassis in other slides.
27
smell test results
28
future applications Improve the workplace environment for microbiologists working with E. coli Port our system to bacterial species involved in bioremediation. Implement our system in bacteria responsible for bad human odor in the mouth, armpits and feet. Implement our system in yeast used in bread and beer production
29
conclusion Designed, built, and tested a synthetic biological system over the course of summer Engineered synthetic scent systems in E. coli Regulated via transcription control devices
30
acknowledgments Natalia Dudareva, Purdue University: gifts of expression vectors encoding BAMT, SAMT and BSMT enzymes. Eran Pichersky, University of Michigan: suggestion of eliminating indole from Escherichia coli to mitigate the natural "bad" smell. Mary Berlyn, CGSC, The Coli Genetic Stock Center: Esherichia coli strain YYC912. Brian Cook, MIT: valuable discussions. Cornelia Reimmann, University of Lausanne: gift of an expression vector carrying the pchBA coding region. Dieter Haas, University of Lausanne: gift of the Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHA0. Peter Bakker, Utrecht University, The Netherlands: gift of an expression vector carrying the pmsCEAB coding region, as well as, gift of the Pseudomonas fluorescens strain WCS374. Herbert P. Schweizer, Colorado State University: gift of the pUCP22 Esherichia coli to Pseudomonas shuttle vector. Pamela Silver, Harvard Medical School: gift of yeast BioBricks vector. Get rid of depts.
31
questions and answers
32
growth curves
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.