Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Human Resources Transformation
CPD Day, 26th April 2017 Joe Cooper, Head of Service Transformation
2
Outline Background, Context and work to date What are our objectives?
What are the timescales? How and when to get involved Next steps
3
Key Messages Building from a strong platform
Change is inevitable and will need to be significant The transformation programme will cover all of HR, not just operations Change will be participative and your contributions will be essential.
4
College Context Financial challenges linked to growth ambition
Education and Research outputs to grow Support Services costs to remain flat We need to do more with the same amount of resources Resources available in the short term to support change initiatives
5
The case for change HR (and the College) have grown organically over the past 15 years What we do is well regarded and we should be proud of how we got here By finding new ways of operating we can respond to the need to grow capacity and improve our working lives One opportunity to spend time and resources to find savings going forward.
6
Change Principles Our processes, services and structure should be designed around our users, rather than cost centres Optimising their journey Delivering an excellent experience Development of any new approaches will be collaborative All levels of HR Deep involvement of our partners and stakeholders Crucial Role of FOOs and Service Directors
7
Work to date Initial analysis of HR Operations
OE work in Payroll/Pensions Operating Model and Systems review in Recruitment Detailed plan developed and submitted for 2017/8 planning round and PRIB (Project Resource Investment Board)
8
ISSUES EXAMPLES IMPACTS Inefficient use of time, effort and resources
INCONSISTENT PROCESSES ACROSS FACULTIES Due to preference rather than design Probation – checking, chasing and impact Sickness management Immigration management Inefficient use of time, effort and resources Inconsistent value proposition for HR Inconsistent staff (service user) experience Inability to match resource to demand Compliance and regulatory risk OWNERSHIP OF PROCESS STEPS VARIES ACROSS FACULTIES Inconsistent split between central HR, Faculty HR teams and departmental administration Recruitment – ‘Full Service’ in Business School, devolved to departments in Engineering WASTED EFFORT AND TIME Repeated processes, processes with no outcome, QA checking of manual processes, processes designed to work around non-compliance Probation chasing in Support Services QA work (contact request forms, contracts) Requests for information for Home Office DISCONNECT BETWEEN POLICY/PROCEDURE/GUIDANCE/REALITY Central governance and compliance control is weak Immigration Management Probation checking and chasing INCONSISTENT JOB DESIGN IN HR Roles have changed over time in image of Faculties/departments – hierarchical structure designed around HR career pathways Senior HR Administrator role a combination of advice and basic administration Nature of role changes dependent on faculty POOR INTEGRATION WITH PAYROLL AND PENSIONS Relationships and processes are fractured Manual information exchange (e.g. New starter form) Slow issue and query resolution NO STANDARD PROCESS FOR QUERIES Many varying routes in and out – no way of recording trends, minimising repeated effort or ensuring consistency Range of drop ins/roadshows/telephone/ Undertaken by Senior HR Administrators with other work streams SILO WORKING HR teams operate separately and don’t share resources unless urgent. Learning and best practice not effectively shared Implementation of e-filing Some HR roles dominated by admin
11
Systems Review Review the current usages and users of the system
Understand the interdependencies with linked systems Consider how our systems are configured and utilised Understand the opportunities, costs as risks of changing to a new central HR system Replace systems(s) if the benefits outweigh the costs Support from ICT consultancy to undertake this work
12
Operating Model Review
Operating Model – A way of representing or describing how we deliver our service across the College (often in diagrammatical form) Process, Organisation and People, Locations and Building, Information Systems, Suppliers and Business Partners, Management System. Our current operating model? Considerations include Self Service and automation vs physical presence Centres of expertise or multi-disciplinary teams Shared services or locally driven teams The model must ensure that the service supports the College’s strategic objectives
15
Operating Model Review
Map the ‘As-is’ operating model and understand the perspectives of HR staff and key stakeholders Understand current baselines in terms of volumes and performance indicators Research external organisations and understand the opportunities and risks that could result from change. Establish target operating model and establish potential benefits, outcomes and success criteria Develop plan to deliver new model In consultation with all HR staff In conjunction with College operating model developments In partnership with Faculties and Departments
18
Process Review What we currently do, who does it and how we do it varies enormously across the organisation. Variance between published policy, procedures and the way things actually take place Examples include recruitment, probation support etc. Business process mapping enables the organisation to be more effective through Providing a framework to establish improved ways of doing things Highlight variances in process and duplicated work and help reduce wasted time and effort Improve the effectiveness and reduces the time required for training and induction Reduces risk by ensuring that key legal/compliance steps are undertaken, and outlines who is responsible Assigning tasks to roles rather than individual
19
Process Review Map “Level One’ processes E.g. ‘Manage ER’
Map ‘As-is’ ’on the ground’ processes Find improvements, efficiencies and harmonisation Connect processes and highlight areas of handoff Highlight opportunities for improvements to inform proposals for operating model/ systems review Use of Nimbus
23
Approach Three distinct areas Operating model and structure of HR
Systems review and development Process mapping and process reform Could be dealt with separately but this would limit the scale of the benefits that we could achieve.
24
Phase One - Discovery May – August 2017
Complete first phase of Operating Model review Workshops with Faculties/HR Staff/Stakeholders Develop first draft of target Operating Model Level One Process Mapping Review of functionality of HR systems
25
Phase Two- Analysis September 2017 – March 2018
Complete ‘As-is’ process mapping exercise make immediate and ongoing improvements, and ascertain future opportunities Set KPIs for the proposed Operating Model Scan market for potential system replacement Develop system requirements Publish consolidated opportunity analysis (Skills, Technology, Organisational)
26
Phase Three - Preparation
March 2018 – July 2018 Gain final agreement of Operating Model and plan any changes required Undertake ’to-be’ mapping exercise to support new operating model Develop HR portal to improve accessibility of processes Decision on procurement of new HR system Continually consult with HR Staff
27
Phase Four- Deployment
July 2018 – December 2018 Begin implementing new structure following consultation Complete process mapping and prepare for launch of HR Portal Begin deployment of new HR system (if required) Launch of new systems and structure – November 2018
28
Key Messages Change Principles
Our processes, services and structure should be designed our users, rather than cost centres Optimising their journey Delivering an excellent experience Development of any new approaches will be collaborative All levels of HR Deep involvement of our partners and stakeholders Crucial Role of FOOs and service directors Building from a strong platform Change is inevitable and will need to be significant The transformation programme will cover all of HR, not just operations Change will be participative and your contributions will be essential.
29
Thanks for listening Any questions?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.