Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

John Loucks St. Edward’s University . SLIDES . BY.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "John Loucks St. Edward’s University . SLIDES . BY."— Presentation transcript:

1 John Loucks St. Edward’s University . SLIDES . BY

2 Chapter 12 Comparing Multiple Proportions, Test of Independence and Goodness of Fit
Testing the Equality of Population Proportions for Three or More Populations Test of Independence Goodness of Fit Test

3 Comparing Multiple Proportions, Test of Independence and Goodness of Fit
In this chapter we introduce three additional hypothesis-testing procedures. The test statistic and the distribution used are based on the chi-square (c2) distribution. In all cases, the data are categorical.

4 Testing the Equality of Population Proportions
for Three or More Populations Using the notation p1 = population proportion for population 1 p2 = population proportion for population 2 and pk = population proportion for population k The hypotheses for the equality of population proportions for k > 3 populations are as follows: H0: p1 = p2 = = pk Ha: Not all population proportions are equal

5 Testing the Equality of Population Proportions
for Three or More Populations If H0 cannot be rejected, we cannot detect a difference among the k population proportions. If H0 can be rejected, we can conclude that not all k population proportions are equal. Further analyses can be done to conclude which population proportions are significantly different from others.

6 Testing the Equality of Population Proportions
for Three or More Populations Example: Finger Lakes Homes Finger Lakes Homes manufactures three models of prefabricated homes, a two-story colonial, a log cabin, and an A-frame. To help in product-line planning, management would like to compare the customer satisfaction with the three home styles. p1 = proportion likely to repurchase a Colonial for the population of Colonial owners p2 = proportion likely to repurchase a Log Cabin for the population of Log Cabin owners p3 = proportion likely to repurchase an A-Frame for the population of A-Frame owners

7 Testing the Equality of Population Proportions
for Three or More Populations We begin by taking a sample of owners from each of the three populations. Each sample contains categorical data indicating whether the respondents are likely or not likely to repurchase the home.

8 Testing the Equality of Population Proportions
for Three or More Populations Observed Frequencies (sample results) Home Owner Colonial Log A-Frame Total Likely to Yes Repurchase No Total

9 Testing the Equality of Population Proportions
for Three or More Populations Next, we determine the expected frequencies under the assumption H0 is correct. Expected Frequencies Under the Assumption H0 is True If a significant difference exists between the observed and expected frequencies, H0 can be rejected.

10 Testing the Equality of Population Proportions
for Three or More Populations Expected Frequencies (computed) Home Owner Colonial Log A-Frame Total Likely to Yes Repurchase No Total

11 Testing the Equality of Population Proportions
for Three or More Populations Next, compute the value of the chi-square test statistic. where: fij = observed frequency for the cell in row i and column j eij = expected frequency for the cell in row i and column j under the assumption H0 is true Note: The test statistic has a chi-square distribution with k – 1 degrees of freedom, provided the expected frequency is 5 or more for each cell.

12 Testing the Equality of Population Proportions
for Three or More Populations Computation of the Chi-Square Test Statistic. Obs. Exp. Sqd. Sqd. Diff. / Likely to Home Freq. Diff. Exp. Freq. Repurch. Owner fij eij (fij - eij) (fij - eij)2 (fij - eij)2/eij Yes Colonial 97 97.50 -0.50 0.2500 0.0026 Log Cab. 83 72.94 10.06 1.3862 A-Frame 80 89.56 -9.56 1.0196 No 38 37.50 0.50 0.0067 18 28.06 -10.06 3.6041 44 34.44 9.56 2.6509 Total 360 c2 = 8.6700

13 Testing the Equality of Population Proportions
for Three or More Populations Rejection Rule p-value approach: Reject H0 if p-value < a Critical value approach: Reject H0 if where  is the significance level and there are k - 1 degrees of freedom

14 Testing the Equality of Population Proportions
for Three or More Populations Rejection Rule (using a = .05) Reject H0 if p-value < .05 or c2 > 5.991 With  = .05 and k - 1 = = 2 degrees of freedom Do Not Reject H0 Reject H0 2 5.991

15 Testing the Equality of Population Proportions
for Three or More Populations Conclusion Using the p-Value Approach Area in Upper Tail c2 Value (df = 2) Because c2 = is between and 7.378, the area in the upper tail of the distribution is between .01 and .025. The p-value < a . We can reject the null hypothesis. Actual p-value is .0131

16 Testing the Equality of Population Proportions
for Three or More Populations We have concluded that the population proportions for the three populations of home owners are not equal. To identify where the differences between population proportions exist, we will rely on a multiple comparisons procedure.

17 Multiple Comparisons Procedure
We begin by computing the three sample proportions. We will use a multiple comparison procedure known as the Marascuillo procedure.

18 Multiple Comparisons Procedure
Marascuillo Procedure We compute the absolute value of the pairwise difference between sample proportions. Colonial and Log Cabin: Colonial and A-Frame: Log Cabin and A-Frame:

19 Multiple Comparisons Procedure
Critical Values for the Marascuillo Pairwise Comparison For each pairwise comparison compute a critical value as follows: For a = .05 and k = 3: c2 = 5.991

20 Multiple Comparisons Procedure
Pairwise Comparison Tests CVij Significant if Pairwise Comparison > CVij Colonial vs. Log Cabin Colonial vs. A-Frame Log Cabin vs. A-Frame .061 .072 .133 .0923 .0971 .1034 Not Significant Significant

21 Test of Independence 1. Set up the null and alternative hypotheses.
H0: The column variable is independent of the row variable Ha: The column variable is not independent of the row variable 2. Select a random sample and record the observed frequency, fij , for each cell of the contingency table. 3. Compute the expected frequency, eij , for each cell.

22 4. Compute the test statistic.
Test of Independence 4. Compute the test statistic. 5. Determine the rejection rule. Reject H0 if p -value < a or where  is the significance level and, with n rows and m columns, there are (n - 1)(m - 1) degrees of freedom.

23 Test of Independence Example: Finger Lakes Homes (B)
Each home sold by Finger Lakes Homes can be classified according to price and to style. Finger Lakes’ manager would like to determine if the price of the home and the style of the home are independent variables.

24 Test of Independence Example: Finger Lakes Homes (B)
The number of homes sold for each model and price for the past two years is shown below. For convenience, the price of the home is listed as either $99,000 or less or more than $99,000. Price Colonial Log Split-Level A-Frame < $99, > $99,

25 Test of Independence Hypotheses
H0: Price of the home is independent of the style of the home that is purchased Ha: Price of the home is not independent of the style of the home that is purchased

26 Test of Independence Expected Frequencies
Price Colonial Log Split-Level A-Frame Total < $99K > $99K Total

27 Test of Independence Rejection Rule
With  = .05 and (2 - 1)(4 - 1) = 3 d.f., Reject H0 if p-value < .05 or 2 > 7.815 Test Statistic = =

28 Test of Independence Conclusion Using the p-Value Approach
Area in Upper Tail c2 Value (df = 3) Because c2 = is between and 9.348, the area in the upper tail of the distribution is between .05 and .025. The p-value < a . We can reject the null hypothesis. Actual p-value is .0274

29 Test of Independence Conclusion Using the Critical Value Approach
We reject, at the .05 level of significance, the assumption that the price of the home is independent of the style of home that is purchased.

30 Goodness of Fit Test: Multinomial Probability Distribution
1. State the null and alternative hypotheses. H0: The population follows a multinomial distribution with specified probabilities for each of the k categories Ha: The population does not follow a multinomial distribution with specified probabilities for each of the k categories

31 Goodness of Fit Test: Multinomial Probability Distribution
2. Select a random sample and record the observed frequency, fi , for each of the k categories. 3. Assuming H0 is true, compute the expected frequency, ei , in each category by multiplying the category probability by the sample size.

32 Goodness of Fit Test: Multinomial Probability Distribution
4. Compute the value of the test statistic. where: fi = observed frequency for category i ei = expected frequency for category i k = number of categories Note: The test statistic has a chi-square distribution with k – 1 df provided that the expected frequencies are 5 or more for all categories.

33 Goodness of Fit Test: Multinomial Probability Distribution
5. Rejection rule: p-value approach: Reject H0 if p-value < a Critical value approach: Reject H0 if where  is the significance level and there are k - 1 degrees of freedom

34 Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test
Example: Finger Lakes Homes (A) Finger Lakes Homes manufactures four models of prefabricated homes, a two-story colonial, a log cabin, a split-level, and an A-frame. To help in production planning, management would like to determine if previous customer purchases indicate that there is a preference in the style selected.

35 Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test
Example: Finger Lakes Homes (A) The number of homes sold of each model for 100 sales over the past two years is shown below. Split A- Model Colonial Log Level Frame # Sold

36 Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test
Hypotheses H0: pC = pL = pS = pA = .25 Ha: The population proportions are not pC = .25, pL = .25, pS = .25, and pA = .25 where: pC = population proportion that purchase a colonial pL = population proportion that purchase a log cabin pS = population proportion that purchase a split-level pA = population proportion that purchase an A-frame

37 Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test
Rejection Rule Reject H0 if p-value < .05 or c2 > With  = .05 and k - 1 = = 3 degrees of freedom Do Not Reject H0 Reject H0 2 7.815

38 Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test
Expected Frequencies Test Statistic e1 = .25(100) = e2 = .25(100) = 25 e3 = .25(100) = e4 = .25(100) = 25 = = 10

39 Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test
Conclusion Using the p-Value Approach Area in Upper Tail c2 Value (df = 3) Because c2 = 10 is between and , the area in the upper tail of the distribution is between .025 and .01. The p-value < a . We can reject the null hypothesis.

40 Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test
Conclusion Using the Critical Value Approach c2 = 10 > 7.815 We reject, at the .05 level of significance, the assumption that there is no home style preference.

41 Goodness of Fit Test: Normal Distribution
1. State the null and alternative hypotheses. H0: The population has a normal distribution Ha: The population does not have a normal distribution 2. Select a random sample and a. Compute the mean and standard deviation. b. Define intervals of values so that the expected frequency is at least 5 for each interval. c. For each interval, record the observed frequencies Compute the expected frequency, ei , for each interval. (Multiply the sample size by the probability of a normal random variable being in the interval.

42 Goodness of Fit Test: Normal Distribution
4. Compute the value of the test statistic. 5. Reject H0 if (where  is the significance level and there are k - 3 degrees of freedom).

43 Goodness of Fit Test: Normal Distribution
Example: IQ Computers IQ Computers (one better than HP?) manufactures and sells a general purpose microcomputer. As part of a study to evaluate sales personnel, management wants to determine, at a .05 significance level, if the annual sales volume (number of units sold by a salesperson) follows a normal probability distribution.

44 Goodness of Fit Test: Normal Distribution
Example: IQ Computers A simple random sample of 30 of the salespeople was taken and their numbers of units sold are listed below. (mean = 71, standard deviation = 18.54)

45 Goodness of Fit Test: Normal Distribution
Hypotheses H0: The population of number of units sold has a normal distribution with mean 71 and standard deviation Ha: The population of number of units sold does not have a normal distribution with mean 71 and standard deviation

46 Goodness of Fit Test: Normal Distribution
Interval Definition To satisfy the requirement of an expected frequency of at least 5 in each interval we will divide the normal distribution into 30/5 = 6 equal probability intervals.

47 Goodness of Fit Test: Normal Distribution
Interval Definition Areas = 1.00/6 = .1667 53.02 71 88.98 = (18.54) (18.54) = 63.03 78.97

48 Goodness of Fit Test: Normal Distribution
Observed and Expected Frequencies i fi ei fi - ei Less than 53.02 53.02 to 63.03 63.03 to 71.00 71.00 to 78.97 78.97 to 88.98 More than 88.98 6 3 5 4 30 5 30 1 -2 -1 Total

49 Goodness of Fit Test: Normal Distribution
Rejection Rule With  = .05 and k - p - 1 = = 3 d.f. (where k = number of categories and p = number of population parameters estimated), Reject H0 if p-value < .05 or 2 > Test Statistic

50 Goodness of Fit Test: Normal Distribution
Conclusion Using the p-Value Approach Area in Upper Tail c2 Value (df = 3) Because c2 = is between .584 and in the Chi-Square Distribution Table, the area in the upper tail of the distribution is between .90 and .10. The p-value > a . We cannot reject the null hypothesis. There is little evidence to support rejecting the assumption the population is normally distributed with  = 71 and  = Actual p-value is .6594

51 End of Chapter 12


Download ppt "John Loucks St. Edward’s University . SLIDES . BY."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google