1. Discovery and measurement of leptonic CP violation using an intensive neutrino Super Beam generated with the exceptionally powerful ESS linear accelerator Design Study
CERN May 2014
M. Dracos

2. Which H2020 call? H2020-INFRADEV-2014/2015
Conceptual and technical design of new research infrastructures, which are of a clear European dimension and interest, through a bottom-up approach (deadline and budget 2014);
Preparatory phases of ESFRI projects, through a targeted approach (deadline and budget 2015);
Individual implementation and operation of prioritised ESFRI projects (notably ERICs), through a targeted approach (deadline and budget 2015);
Implementation and operation of cross-cutting infrastructure services and solutions for clusters of ESFRI and other world class research infrastructures (deadline 2014 and budget ).
CERN May 2014
M. Dracos

3. Developing New World-Class research Infrastructures (H2020-INFRADEV-1-2014-1)
CERN May 2014
M. Dracos

4. H2020-INFRADEV-1-2014-1 Design Studies
Type of action: RIA (Research Infrastructure Activities)
Specific challenge:
New leading-edge research infrastructures in order to remain at the forefront of the advancement of research
The aim of this activity is to support the conceptual and technical design and preparatory actions for new research infrastructures, which are of a clear European dimension and interest.
Major upgrades of existing infrastructures may also be considered if the end result is intended to be equivalent to, or capable of replacing, an existing infrastructure.
Scope:
Design studies should address all key questions concerning the technical, legal and financial feasibility, leading to a CDR showing the maturity of the concept and forming the basis for identifying and constructing the next generation of Europe's and the world's leading research infrastructures.
CDRs will present major choices for design alternatives and associated cost ranges.
CERN May 2014
M. Dracos

5. H2020-INFRADEV
Scope: The activities that could be performed in a Design Study proposal include:
Scientific and technical work, i.e.:
the drafting of concepts and engineering plans for the construction,
creation of final prototypes for key enabling technologies;
scientific and technical work to ensure that the beneficiary scientific communities exploit the new facility from the start with the highest efficiency.
Strategic work, i.e.:
plans to integrate harmoniously the new infrastructure into the European fabric of related facilities;
the identification of the best possible site(s) for setting up new facilities;
the estimated budget for construction and operation;
the design of a workable legal (e.g. an ERIC) and governance structure;
the planning of research services to be provided at international level.
The Commission considers that proposals requesting a contribution from the EU of between EUR 1 and 3 million would allow this specific challenge to be addressed appropriately. Nonetheless, this does not preclude submission and selection of proposals requesting other amounts.
CERN May 2014
M. Dracos

6. H2020-INFRADEV-1-2014-1 Expected impact:
Funding bodies for research infrastructures become aware of the strategic and funding needs of the scientific community.
Policy bodies at the national level (e.g. funding bodies, governments), at European level (e.g. ESFRI) and internationally (e.g. the Organisation for Economic Co- operation and Development's Global Science Forum) have a sound decision basis to establish long-range plans and roadmaps for new research infrastructures of pan- European or global interest.
The technical work carried out under this topic will contribute to strengthening the technological development capacity and effectiveness as well as the scientific performance, efficiency and attractiveness of the European Research Area.
Eligibility conditions: At least three legal entities. Each of the three shall be established in a different Member State or associated country. All three legal entities shall be independent of each other.
Funding rate: up to 100%
CERN May 2014
M. Dracos

7. H2020-INFRADEV-1-2014-1 Evaluation
CERN May 2014
M. Dracos

8. Document Structure Title of Proposal List of participants
List of participants
CERN May 2014
M. Dracos

9. Document Structure Excellence 1.1 Objectives
Describe the specific objectives for the project, which should be clear, measurable, realistic and achievable within the duration of the project. Objectives should be consistent with the expected exploitation and impact of the project.
1.2 Relation to the work programme
Indicate the work programme topic to which your proposal relates, and explain how your proposal addresses the specific challenge and scope of that topic, as set out in the work programme.
1.3 Concept and approach
Describe and explain the overall concept underpinning the project. Describe the main ideas, models or assumptions involved. Identify any trans-disciplinary considerations;
Describe the positioning of the project e.g. where it is situated in the spectrum from ‘idea to application’, or from ‘lab to market’. Refer to Technology Readiness Levels where relevant.
Describe any national or international research and innovation activities which will be linked with the project, especially where the outputs from these will feed into the project;
Describe and explain the overall approach and methodology, distinguishing, as appropriate, activities indicated in the relevant section of the work programme, e.g. for research, demonstration, piloting, first market replication, etc;
Where relevant, describe how sex and/or gender analysis is taken into account in the project’s content.
1.4 Ambition
Describe the advance your proposal would provide beyond the state-of-the-art, and the extent the proposed work is ambitious. Your answer could refer to the ground-breaking nature of the objectives, concepts involved, issues and problems to be addressed, and approaches and methods to be used.
Describe the innovation potential which the proposal represents. Where relevant, refer to products and services already available on the market. Please refer to the results of any patent search carried out.
CERN May 2014
M. Dracos

10. Document Structure Impact
How will this data be exploited and/or shared/made accessible for verification and re-use? If data cannot be made available, explain why.
How will this data be curated and preserved?
Outline the strategy for knowledge management and protection. Include measures to provide open access (free on- line access, such as the ‘green’ or ‘gold’ model) to peer-reviewed scientific publications which might result from the project.
Communication activities
Describe the proposed communication measures for promoting the project and its findings during the period of the grant.
Measures should be proportionate to the scale of the project, with clear objectives. They should be tailored to the needs of various audiences, including groups beyond the project's own community.
Where relevant, include measures for public/societal engagement on issues related to the project.
3. Implementation
3.1 Work plan — Work packages, deliverables and milestones
brief presentation of the overall structure of the work plan;
timing of the different work packages and their components (Gantt chart or similar);
detailed work description, i.e.:
a description of each work package (table 3.1a);
a list of work packages (table 3.1b);
a list of major deliverables (table 3.1c);
graphical presentation of the components showing how they inter-relate (Pert chart or similar).
CERN May 2014
M. Dracos

11. Document Structure 3.2 Management structure and procedures
Describe the organisational structure and the decision-making ( including a list of milestones (table 3.2a))
Explain why the organisational structure and decision-making mechanisms are appropriate to the complexity and scale of the project.
Describe, where relevant, how effective innovation management will be addressed in the management structure and work plan.
Describe any critical risks, relating to project implementation, that the stated project's objectives may not be achieved. Detail any risk mitigation measures. Please provide a table with critical risks identified and mitigating actions (table 3.2b)
3.3 Consortium as a whole
Describe the consortium.
How will it match the project’s objectives?
How do the members complement one another (and cover the value chain, where appropriate)? In what way does each of them contribute to the project? How will they be able to work effectively together?
If applicable, describe the industrial/commercial involvement in the project to ensure exploitation of the results and explain why this is consistent with and will help to achieve the specific measures which are proposed for exploitation of the results of the project (see section 2.3).
3.4 Resources to be committed
a table showing number of person/months required (table 3.4a)
a table showing ‘other direct costs’ (table 3.4b) for participants where those costs exceed 15% of the personnel costs (according to the budget table in section 3 of the administrative proposal forms)
CERN May 2014
M. Dracos

12. Participants Section 4: Members of the consortium
4.1. Participants (applicants)
a description of the legal entity and its main tasks, with an explanation of how its profile matches the tasks in the proposal;
a curriculum vitae or description of the profile of the persons, including their gender, who will be primarily responsible for carrying out the proposed research and/or innovation activities;
a list of up to 5 relevant publications, and/or products, services (including widely-used datasets or software), or other achievements relevant to the  call content;
a list of up to 5 relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal;
a description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work;
[any other supporting documents specified in the work programme for this call.]
4.2. Third parties involved in the project (including use of third party resources)
CERN May 2014
M. Dracos

13. Tables
CERN May 2014
M. Dracos

14. Tables
CERN May 2014
M. Dracos

15. Tables
CERN May 2014
M. Dracos

16. ESSnuSB
ESSnuSB
CERN May 2014
M. Dracos

17. ESSnuSB
Title of Proposal: Discovery and measurement of leptonic CP violation using an intensive neutrino Super Beam generated with the exceptionally powerful ESS linear accelerator
Duration: 3 years
List of participants
CERN May 2014
M. Dracos

18. WP Description WP1: Management General management and dissemination
Preparatory actions, with scientific communities, ESS, CERN and Swedish government
CDR, cost and safety
WP2: Linac
H- source and Linac Beam-Line modifications
RF Power and Cooling upgrade
Energy Upgrade
WP3: Accumulator
Accumulator and transfer lines design
Injection stripping of H-
Layout and civil engineering of accumulator
WP4: Target Station
Target/collector Station Design and civil engineering layout
Target
Horn collector and alternatives
WP5: Detector and Physics Performance
Far and Near Detector; cross-section measurements
Performance for CPV as primary project goal
Performance for additional goals: MH, Proton lifetime, and cosmological neutrinos
WP6: Detector Site
Underground site location, access and test measurements
Cavern shape, excavation, reinforcement and services infrastructures
Relation to the Garpeneberg Mining Company and its concurrent mining activity
CERN May 2014
M. Dracos

19. Recommendations from outside
Main effort on new items compared to those already studied in previous Design Studies:
WP2 and WP3
WP4 from EUROν
WP5 from LAGUNA-LBNO and EUROν
WP6 from LAGUNA-LBNO
Do not exceed 2 M€!
Difficult to produce a complete CDR under these conditions
WP2: 2 postdocs
WP3: 1-2 postdocs
WP4: 0-1 postdoc
WP5: only traveling money
WP6: only traveling money
traveling: ~2 k€/pers/year.
limited budget for mine subcontracting
CERN May 2014
M. Dracos

20. Total Cost (very preliminary)
All participants
Cost Category
Months
Total
1-12
13-24
25-36
(36 months)
Direct Costs:
Personnel:
Senior Staff
746989
784155
634953
54.8%
Post docs
174121
331307
157186
662614
16.8%
Students
0.0%
Other
Total Personnel:
921110
792139
71.6%
Other Direct Costs:
Equipment
Consumables
Travel
100000
300000
7.6%
Publications, etc
2500
3000
8500
0.2%
Total Other Direct Costs:
102500
103000
308500
7.8%
Total Direct Costs:
895139
79.4%
Indirect Costs (overheads):
Max 25% of Direct Costs
255902
304616
223785
784303
19.8%
Subcontracting Costs:
(No overheads)
10000
30000
0.8%
Total Costs of project:
(by year and total)
100.0%
Requested Grant:
559608
766180
510063
46.5%
CERN May 2014
M. Dracos

21. Cost/WP (very preliminary)
detectors physics det. site
Tot manpower
Cost Category
Months
WP1
WP2
WP3
WP4
WP5
WP6
WP7
Total %
Direct Costs:
Personnel:
Senior Staff 18 45 50 94 26 29 7
268
73.6%
Post docs 48 96
26.4%
Students
0.0%
Other
Total Personnel: 93 98
364
100.0%
Fraction
5.0%
25.5%
27.0%
25.7%
7.0%
7.8%
2.0%
Euros
182654
383104
537126
571562
181203
236741
73708
76.6%
282614
380000
662614
23.4%
665718
917126
6.5%
23.5%
32.4%
20.2%
6.4%
8.4%
2.6%
CERN May 2014
M. Dracos

22. Design Study Structure (preliminary)
CERN May 2014
M. Dracos

23. Design Study Structure (preliminary)
WP1: management
WP2: Linac (ESS, Uppsala, CERN)
Power upgrade
Cooling upgrade
H- source
WP3: Accumulator (ESS, CERN, Uppsala, Strasbourg)
Design
Transfer lines
Switchyard
Stripping
WP4: Target Station (RAL, Cracow, Strasbourg, Uppsala)
Target
Collector
Decay Tunnel
WP5: Detectors (Uppsala, Sofia, Strasbourg, Lund)
Underground site
Far detector
Near detector
WP6: Physics Performance (KTH, Madrid, Lund, Durham)
CP violation
Mass Hierarchy
Astroparticles
Proton lifetime
CERN May 2014
M. Dracos

24. Deliverables (preliminary)WP #
deliverables
milestones
title
timing
resources [pm] 2
D2.1
H- source and impact of H- acceleration on the ESS 4
M2.1.1
H- source design 1
M2.1.2
Integration in the ESS (optics and hardware)
M2.2.2
Beam losses and activation
D2.2
Upgrade of the ESS RF system
M2.2.1
Conceptual design of the ESS RF upgrade
Integration in the existing system
M2.2.3
Performance for protons and H-
M2.2.4
powering and cooling schemes 3
D3.1
Accumulator and transfer lines conceptual design
M3.1.1
Accumulator layout and optics
M3.1.2
Transfer lines layout and optics
M3.1.3
Space charge and beam dynamics
D3.2
Charge exchange injection, extraction and activation aspects
M3.2.1
Injection system design
M3.2.2
injection efficiency, control of losses and activation
M3.2.3
Extraction
D4.x
Innovative hadron collector R&D results
M12
M4.x.1
paraxial optics solutions: focusing and charge separation M6
M4.x.2
minimization of the aberrations for large divergences M9
M4.x.3
Solenoid and separation design
M10
M4.x.4
Heat deposition and shields
D4.1
Target for ESS power
M4.1.1
Is packed bed target suitable for ESSnuSB?
M4.1.2
Target cooling
M4.1.3
Target integration
M30
D4.2
Horn and pulse generator
M4.2.1
Design of the horn
M4.2.2
Requirements for pulse generator according to the beam ferequency
M4.2.3
Design of the pulse generator 6
M4.2.4
Cooling system
M24
D4.3
Target Station Layout
M4.3.1
Design of the target station/tunnel/beam dump 5
D5.1
Near detector
M5.1.1
Requirements
M5.1.2
Design
M5.1.3
Final performance
D5.2
Far detector
M5.2.1
Final design of MEMPHYS detector
D5.3
Physics Performance
M5.3.1
Physics Performance according to initial parameters
M5.3.2
Physics Performance after optimizations
M5.3.3
Final Physics Performance
D6.1
Far detector site
M6.1
Garpenberg site general evaluation
M6.2
Zinkgruvan site general evaluation
M18
M6.3
M6.4
D1.1
Parameters
M1.1.1
List of initial parameters for all tasks
M1.1.2
Optimized parameters
M1.1.3
Final parameters
D1.2
Baseline
M1.2.1
Final baseline for far detector
M1.2.2
Final baseline for near detector
D1.3
Cost
M1.3.1
Cost of the whole facility
D1.4
Safety
M1.3.2
Safety report
CERN May 2014
M. Dracos

25. To be provided by all participants
linac accumulator target st detectors physics det. site
months/pers/year/WP
this is not just your salary
CERN May 2014
M. Dracos

26. Form A: Budget/participant
CERN May 2014
M. Dracos