Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJob Harrison Modified over 6 years ago
1
Fig 1 Distribution of GlideScope<sup>®</sup> videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy patients from the Paediatric Difficult Intubation Registry. GVL, GlideScope<sup>®</sup> videolaryngoscope; DL, direct laryngoscopy. The efficacy of GlideScope® videolaryngoscopy compared with direct laryngoscopy in children who are difficult to intubate: an analysis from the paediatric difficult intubation registry Br J Anaesth. 2017;119(5): doi: /bja/aex344 Br J Anaesth | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please
2
Fig 2 Initial and eventual success for GlideScope<sup>®</sup> videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for all patients and patients less than 10 kilograms. *Statistically significant. For all patients and also for patients less than 10 kg, GVL had significantly higher initial and eventual success rates than DL. For patients less than 10 kg, GVL had significantly lower initial and eventual success rates than for all GVL patients. Rates of intubation success did not differ significantly between DL patients less than 10 kg and all DL patients. GVL, GlideScope<sup>®</sup> videolaryngoscope; DL, direct laryngoscopy. The efficacy of GlideScope® videolaryngoscopy compared with direct laryngoscopy in children who are difficult to intubate: an analysis from the paediatric difficult intubation registry Br J Anaesth. 2017;119(5): doi: /bja/aex344 Br J Anaesth | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.