Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Discrete Tomography Péter Balázs Department of Image Processing and

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Discrete Tomography Péter Balázs Department of Image Processing and"— Presentation transcript:

1 Discrete Tomography Péter Balázs Department of Image Processing and
14th Summer School on Image Processing, 5 July, 2006, Szeged, Hungary Discrete Tomography Diavetites/ Vetitesi Beallitasok/ Animacio Nelkul Péter Balázs Department of Image Processing and Computer Graphics University of Szeged, HUNGARY

2 Outline What is Computerized Tomography (CT)
What is Discrete Tomography (DT) Binary tomography using 2 projections Ambiguity and complexity problems A priori information Reconstruction as optimization Open questions

3 Tomography A technique for imaging the 2D cross-sections of 3D objects
parts of human body with X-rays structure of molecules or crystals obtaining shape information of industrial parts

4 Computerized Tomography
x y s u σ f (x,y) X-rays Reconstruct f (x,y) from its projections s Projection of angle σ is a line integral:

5 Discrete Tomography in CT we need a few hundred projections
time consuming expensive sometimes we do not have many projections in many applications the range of the function to be reconstructed is discrete and known  DT (only few 2-10 projections are needed) f : R2 D, if D={0,1} then f has only binary values (presence or absence of material)  binary tomography

6 Binary tomography discrete set: a finite subset of the 2-dimensional integer lattice reconstruct a discrete set from its projections

7 Reconstruction from 2 projections

8 Reconstruction from 2 projections
?

9 Examples

10 Examples

11 Classification

12 Main Problems Consistency Uniqueness Reconstruction 3)  1)

13 Uniqueness and Switching Components
The presence of a switching component is necessary and sufficient for non-uniqueness

14 Reconstruction Ryser, 1957 – from row/column sums R/S, respectively
Construct the non increasing permutation of the elements of S  S’ Fill the rows from left to right  B Shift elements from the rightmost columns of B to the columns where S(B) < S’ Apply the inverse of the permutation that was used to construct S’

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31 Consistency Necessary condition: compatibility
Gale, Ryser, 1957: there exist a solution iff S* S’ 6 5

32 Ambiguity Due to the presence of switching components there can be many solutions with the same two projections Solutions: Further projections can be taken along lattice directions A priori information of the set to be reconstructed can be used In the case of more than 2 projections uniqueness, consistency and reconstruction problems are NP-hard

33 Convexity hv-convex: NP-complete, Woeginger, 1996

34 Connectedness 4-connected: NP-complete, Woeginger, 1996

35 hv-Convex and Connected Sets
hv-convex 4-connected: hv-convex 8-connected: hv-convex 8- but not 4-connected: - Chrobak, Dürr, 1999 - Kuba, 1999 - Balázs, Balogh, Kuba, 2005

36 Reconstruction as Optimization

37 Optimization Problems: binary variables big system
underdetermined (#equations < #unknowns) inconsistent (if there is noise) Term for prior information: convexity, similarity to a model image, etc. optimization method: e.g., simulated annealing

38 Open Problems New kinds of prior information (e.g., model image, special convexity properties, …) Efficient heuristics for NP-hard reconstruction Guessing geometrical properties from projections Tomography in higher dimensions Stability

39 Thank you for your attention!


Download ppt "Discrete Tomography Péter Balázs Department of Image Processing and"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google