Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

A Cost Effective Alternative for Polyurethane Foams

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "A Cost Effective Alternative for Polyurethane Foams"— Presentation transcript:

1 A Cost Effective Alternative for Polyurethane Foams

2 Overview Ecomate Product Review Useage & Market Applications
Discontinuous Panels Ecomate Spray Foam & Emissions Integral Skin Foam Considerations/FAQs Ecomate’s Success & Availability

3 What is ecomate®? A liquid blowing agent or a foam expansion agent
An alternative blowing agent for rigid and flexible applications Cost competitive & economical Been in Commercial use since the past 10 years Meets regulatory standards as an alternative in PU foams

4 Regulatory US EPA SNAP Approved RoHS and WEEE Compliant GRAS Approved
Non-Toxic VOC-Exempt Montreal & Kyoto Protocol Compliant UL, FM & USCG Classified Systems

5 Properties & Comparison
Well-suited blowing agent for PUR & PIR foams Similar to HCFC-141b Liquid at room temperature No special equipment needed when handling Non-ozone depleting and virtually zero GWP Properties ecomate® 141b Boiling Point °C 31.5 32 Gas Lambda 25°C 10.7 10 Molecular Weight 60 117 Specific Gravity 0.982 1.24 Flash Point -19°C ND LEL (ppm) 50,000 72,000 Ozone Depletion Potential 0.11 Global Warming Potential ~1 725

6 ecomate® Sector Usage

7 ecomate® Applications
Rigid Foams Pour-In-Place Rigid Insulating Foams Commercial Foodservice Equipment/ Commercial Refrigeration Discontinuous Panels Cold Stores Houses – Modular Transport Continuous Panels Flex Faced Metal Faced Block Foams Sheets Pipe Sections Spray Foams Industrial Dwellings

8 Discontinuous Foam PUR/ PIR Block Foams
Discontinuous block foam, picture shows a comparison between HCFC141b (right) and Ecomate (left) Ecomate foams can achieve 5 percent lower density, while maintaining foam strength Lower picture shows cross section of the block, no discoloration apparent

9 Discontinuous Panels- Italy
Foaming trials were conducted in Italy at a large equipment supplier Ecomate systems were used and standard densities were obtained as with a 141b system Results: Compressive Strength 180 kPa Closed Cell Content >95% K-Value 0.023 W/m*K Nominal Density Core Density Left Side Center Right Side Panel “a” 40 kg/m3 34.35 kg/m3 39.70 kg/m3 36.82 kg/m3 Panel “b” 42.5 kg/m3 39.27 kg/m3 39.12 kg/m3 39.57 kg/m3

10 Discontinuous Panels – Vietnam
Discontinuous production of building panels in Vietnam Demold time identical to HCFC141b Insulation properties five percent lower compared to HCFC141b when tested at operating temperatures

11 Spray Foams – Industrial & Dwellings
Worldwide Use: Africa, Asia, Americas, Australia, China, Europe, etc. Produces standard densities [32kg/m3 (2pcf)] Can be processed through standard and/or existing equipment Compatible with currently available raw materials - Polyesters, Mannichs, Sucrose, Amines, Surfactants & Catalysts Mexican systems houses achieved successful trials (UNDP project)

12 Dimensional Stability
Spray Foam − Mexico Density (kg/m3) 1” 2” 3” Average Core 31.58 32.51 34.58 32.89 Overall 34.59 38.13 42.27 38.33 λ-Value (W/m*K) 0.0220 0.0237 0.0229 Dimensional Stability 70°C (15 days) No change -19°C (15 days)

13 Spray Foam - Egypt Spray Foam trial run with Eco-spray R-3000
Good spray pattern and fine cell structure Foam density g/l {2pcf – 2.6pcf} λ- Value was W/m*K Compressive Strength of 42g/l foam was 235 kPa (parallel to rise) Dimensional stability of 32 and 42 g/l foam, no measurable -25 °C Typical Sprayed thickness 100 – 250mm

14 Methyl Formate Concentration
Spray Emissions – 3rd Party Testing Ecomate concentrations were measured at the spray operators as well as in the immediate vicinity The results indicated that the ecomate concentration was below the recommended limit (250mg/m3) Sample No. Methyl Formate Concentration Actual Flow Rate Period of Sampling Person/Area Sampled 1 3.1 mg/m3 65.8 ml/min 12:00-12:50 Spray Operator 2 1.6 mg/m3 70.3 ml/min 12:03-12:50 Assistant 3 4.8 mg/m3 71.3 ml/min 12:05-12:50 Static Sample on Center Pole

15 Spray Emissions – 3rd Party Testing
Spray Foam Example: ecomate® emissions were recorded while spray job was in progress The emissions were collected where the concentration was expected to be the highest Results: At the gun head: PPM Over fresh rising foam: PPM OSHA regulations: 100 PPM

16 System Emissions Stored Systems in Drums/Totes

17 UNDP Validation Report

18 Spray Foam Overview Spray foams are worst-case scenario from a safety and emissions perspective ecomate systems have been proven safe to use by several third party agencies No changes needed Spray foams widely accepted to be worst case scenario from safety and emissions perspective. We have done intensive testing internally and externally. Not once has there proven to be close to bean unsafe scenario. It is safe to assume that if ecomate is safe in spray foam apps, that it will be safe for all other applications.

19 ecomate® Applications
Flexible Foams Integral Skin Foams Automotive Furniture Leisure/ Toys Medicinal Applications Flexible Molded Foams Hypersoft Foams HR Foams Viscoelastic Foams Slabstock Foams Continuous process Box foaming process

20 Integral Skin Polyurethane
What is an ISF Elastomeric Polyurethane Foam Solid Skin on Surface Low Density Foam Core Typical Skin Density >0.8g/cc Typical Core Density <0.4g/cc Applications - Automobile Parts Office Furniture Parts Sporting Goods Medical Equipment Protective Equipment

21 Integral Skin Foams With ecomate one can achieve similar or
better Molding Characteristics as 141b based foams This is achieved through – Excellent solubility in raw materials Perfectly suited Boiling Point - allows skinning without expensive cooling. Benign effect on environment- no GWP, ODP, VOC Lower Molecular Weight advantage over alternatives.

22 Integral Skin Foam – Structure
Densified Skin ISF Low Density Core mm

23 ISF Foaming Process Paint Mold Injection Mix Expansion and Cure Demold
The Foam expands & creates Pressure in the Mold Ecomate® condenses in the Surface Layer causing Densification A Skin is produced on the Surface The Core Foam has a Lower Density This Process requires a Volatile Blowing Agent – ecomate

24 CHOICE OF BLOWING AGENT
WHAT IS THE REQUIREMENT FOR PU FOAMS NON REACTIVE - with Foam ingredients used BOILING POINT – below or just above room temp SOLUBILITY – in all raw materials NON - SOLUBLE - to final Polymer Foam ENVIRONMENTALLY - Benign FLAMMABILITY - Non-flammable

25 PROPERTIES – PHYSICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL

26 Considerations Not a Drop-in replacement for all systems
Optimization is REQUIRED! Minimal Capital Expense Fractional compared to hydrocarbon technology Cost Efficient Environmentally Benign Meets Montreal Protocol Meets Kyoto Protocol Thermally Efficient Flash Point ecomate – pure form flammable -19⁰C flash point ecomate – polyol blend nonflammable +70⁰C flash point ecomate – mdi blend nonflammable +80⁰C flash point

27 Considerations ecomate is not a corrosive species
ecomate stored and shipped in metal containers Potential issues arise from: Unoptimized system Improper use of equipment Plastic seal compatibility must be checked! PTFE & Kalrez seals recommended

28 Is ecomate® - Flammable?
Pure ecomate is flammable Ecomate blended systems are considered combustible just like 141b-blown systems Why is this important? ecomate® systems are safer to handle than flammables and Hydrocarbon/Pentane PU systems. In addition, systems made with ecomate have much lower shipping, handling & storage costs vs. Hydrocarbon/Pentane systems and other flammables. Facilities equipped to handle 141b systems and/or isocyanates need little to no changes or upgrades. There is no need for large capital changes to facilities. High Insurance premiums and costs associated with flammables and Hydrocarbon/Pentane PU systems are much lower for systems made with ecomate.

29 Is ecomate® Safe? YES Contributing factors
Chemical Nature High Solubility Low Volatility Can be handled similar to HCFC-141b Systems If adhering to current regulations and handling precautions for MDI ….user is covered and should have nothing to worry about. User training & Safe Handling Guide Stresses Basic “Best” Practices Above & Beyond Requirements

30 Why is ecomate successful?
Compatible with all PU raw materials Meets or exceeds energy standards Can process through standard and/or existing equipment No additional capital investment necessary Available worldwide

31 ecomate® Availability – Worldwide

32 Conclusions Environmentally safe
More compatibilizing than other blowing agents Minimal to no change in equipment Ecomate spray foam (worst-case scenario) has been proven safe by multiple third party testing facilities Not a Drop-in replacement for all systems Optimization is recommended for success Increasing the functionality of polyol blend Changing the surfactant type and amount Not all polyols OR surfactants are created equal

33 Thank you for your time.


Download ppt "A Cost Effective Alternative for Polyurethane Foams"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google