Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Transnational Litigation and Arbitration
2
Choice of forum forum selection clauses multiple fora w/o clause
US perceived as pro-plaintiff
3
US as forum “As a moth is drawn to the light, so is a litigant drawn to the United States.” –Lord Denning Why contingent fees punitive, multiple damages jury trials in civil cases broader discovery no “loser pays” rule unique causes of action class actions
4
US as forum—more Defendants sometimes stipulate to liability if US suit dismissed But US not always best—e.g., UK for defamation Expense—for small amounts, plaintiff may be better off at home
5
Strategies for forum choice
Exclusive forum selection clause Non-exclusive clauses permit but don’t require a forum Must have agreement, but clause can cover torts arising from agreement
6
Forum choice w/o selection clause
First-to-file can be defendant seeking “negative declaration” filing status not dispositive (a factor) Move for forum non conveniens dismissal mostly US law question some assessment of foreign law
7
Attacking foreign forum
substantive law inadequate procedures inadequate political/social circumstances
8
Service start w/ FRCP look for treaty (Hague Convention where applicable) State Department website = best source letters rogatory/letters of request
9
Discovery --various scenarios
unilateral application of US rules abroad request for judicial assistance from foreign authorities—Hague Convention on Taking of Evidence Abroad letters rogatory (28 USC § 178)
10
Judgments no multinational agreement for US
usually pursue separate action for enforcement in foreign juris. Martindale-Hubbell = great starting point
11
Researching international litigation
Fairly good resources US law often applies or discusses treatises CLE materials (PLI, ALI-ABA) State Department Martindale-Hubbell
12
International Commercial Arbitration (ICA)
Why favored distrust of foreign legal system speed resolution by expert in business control of rules awards easier to enforce secrecy
13
Types of arbitration institutional vs. ad hoc
specialized vs. general purpose institutions state vs. private parties
14
Institutions Big players now many others specialized or general ICC
LCIA AAA now many others specialized or general
15
Enforcement bilateral investment treaties (BITs)
separate bilateral agreement New York Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards limits grounds for attack most attorneys limit venues to signatory countries
16
Case Law on UNCITRAL Texts--CLOUT
Digest arranged by article number Rule statement with citations Most CLOUT cases are on non-conformity of goods
17
Researching arbitration
arbitration traditionally confidential some awards available Transnational Law Database Kluwer subscription database Lexis and Westlaw ICSID CLOUT Gloria Miccioli’s ASIL guide: International Commercial Arbitration
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.