Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAlexandra Johns Modified over 6 years ago
1
Mixed Layer Depth in the Arctic Seas in observations and models
The seasonal cycle of Mixed Layer Depth in the Arctic Seas in observations and models Michael Steele Mark Wensnahan Jinlun Zhang Polar Science Center Applied Physics Laboratory University of Washington & NCAR, NOC, NPS, AWI…
2
Phytoplankton Growth = Primary Production depends on…
Michael Steele Polar Science Center / APL University of Washington Phytoplankton Growth = Primary Production depends on… light lead deep MLD: light deficit? shallow MLD: nutrient deficit? nutrients Skyllingstad & Denbo, 1998
3
Def’n: Mixed Layer Depth
Michael Steele Polar Science Center / APL University of Washington Def’n: Mixed Layer Depth MLD Max “gradient method” …less common: requires smoothing more complicated etc = 0.05 0.125 z 0.2 0.3 z Depth (m) 0-10m 2) 0-10m + “increment method” …more common: easier! Sigma-theta (kg/m3)
4
Def’n: Mixed Layer Depth
Michael Steele Polar Science Center / APL University of Washington Def’n: Mixed Layer Depth MLD Max “gradient method” …less common: requires smoothing more complicated etc = 0.05 0.125 z 0.2 0.3 z Depth (m) 0-10m 2) 0-10m + “increment method” …more common: easier! Sigma-theta (kg/m3)
5
Part 1: World Ocean Database’05 (Observed Profiles)
6
Profile data: obs. by month and 3-year bins
1980s & 90s CTD Bottles Profiling floats Buoys 1960s J F M A M J J A S O N D Month # obs
7
Profile data: obs. by month and 3-year bins
1980s & 90s late spring CTD Bottles Profiling floats Buoys 1960s summer J F M A M J J A S O N D Month # obs
8
# profiles per 100 km EASE grid cell
185,020 81,288 # profiles Good profiles Rejected profiles
9
Reasons for rejection # rejected 1 5 No data above 10 m
15 50 200 1000 No data above 10 m <4 pts in profile # rejected unstable profile No data below 10 m
10
Monthly MLD (m) >1000 m ~10 m March June September November 1000
400 150 75 25 10 >1000 m few data in Arctic Ocean September November ~10 m
11
Regional Means Russia Russia Alaska
12
Central Arctic Ocean cute lil’ sine wave ~25% MLD (m) St. Dev / MLD
120 80 40 % total % 2000 1990 1980 1970 1960 1950 MLD (m) cute lil’ sine wave 0.6 0.4 0.2 ~25% St. Dev / MLD J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D Month Month
13
Greenland-Iceland-Norwegian Seas
120 80 40 % total % 2000 1990 1980 1970 1960 1950 MLD (m) 0.6 0.4 0.2 ~50% ! St. Dev / MLD J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D Month Month
14
Part 2: PIOMAS Model & …some CCSM
15
PIOMAS: daily vs. monthly MLD
output 5 -5 -10 -15 -20 MLD MLD using T,Smonth minus MLD using T,Sday MLD (m) -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 -0.4 -0.5 MLD MLDmon , MLDday Monthly mean output: underestimates MLD by < ~15 m or < ~50% J F M A M J J A S O N D Month
16
models have a larger seasonal cycle amplitude relative to WOD.
WOD vs. PIOMAS vs. CCSM Models: monthly means over > 50 years 20 40 60 80 Region 10: central Arctic Ocean WOD MLD (m) CCSM In most regions, models have a larger seasonal cycle amplitude relative to WOD. PIOMAS J F M A M J J A S O N D Month
17
models have a larger seasonal cycle amplitude relative to WOD.
WOD vs. PIOMAS vs. CCSM Models: monthly means over > 50 years 20 40 60 80 Region 10: central Arctic Ocean ? WOD MLD (m) CCSM In most regions, models have a larger seasonal cycle amplitude relative to WOD. Salt rejection in leads? refs: Smith, Nguyen, Jin PIOMAS J F M A M J J A S O N D Month
18
WOD vs. PIOMAS vs. CCSM PIOMAS CCSM WOD In Nordic Seas, (?!?)
monthly means 100 200 300 400 Region 7: GIN Sea PIOMAS MLD (m) CCSM WOD In Nordic Seas, (?!?) J F M A M J J A S O N D Month
19
PIOMAS vs. WOD vs. CCSM PIOMAS ~zE CCSM WOD In Nordic Seas, (?!?)
monthly means 100 200 300 400 Region 7: GIN Sea PIOMAS ~zE MLD (m) CCSM WOD In Nordic Seas, (?!?) 300 m! … but it’s all below the euphotic depth zE J F M A M J J A S O N D Month
20
Multi-year PIOMAS monthly means MLD (m) Region 1: Beaufort Sea
10 20 30 40 50 60 MLD (m) Region 1: Beaufort Sea
21
Summary To do list MLD stdev / MLD = 25-50%
Monthly model output underestimates MLD <~50% Not shown: MLD stratification below the MLD To do list Optimal increment? More models Interannual variability
22
ESS + Laptev Seas
23
Beaufort Sea
24
PIOMAS (monthly model) vs. WOD (obs.)
80 40 60 Region 10: central Arctic Ocean MLD (m) J F M A M J J A S O N D Month
25
PIOMAS (monthly model) vs. WOD (obs.)
Region 7: GIN Sea
26
Data Sets WOD’05 Original profile data: require T & S
(early 1900s-present) poor winter, central Arctic Ocean coverage PIOMAS Jinlun Zhang’s ice-ocean model (daily ) (monthly ) excellent coverage everywhere! CCSM & other models… (monthly…)
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.