Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMaurice Porter Modified over 6 years ago
1
Condition and Race Interaction Conclusions and Future Directions
Conditional Empathy: Empathy for Rejected Others Based on Race and Experience Carolyn E. Gibson, Kristina L. McDonald, & Alexa Tullett The University of Alabama Method Research Question Results Condition and Race Interaction Analyses indicated a marginally significant interaction for race X condition on empathic concern, F(1, 193) = 3.05, p = .082. No interactions were found for empathic distress or perspective taking. Does rejection make people more or less empathic? People who have been rejected will have more empathy for a rejected others than people who have been accepted. OR Rejection may decrease empathy for the rejected other, regardless of similarity. People who are similar racially to the target will have more empathy than people who are racially different. Participant Characteristics Play Cyberball Answer questions about Cyberball experience Watch someone play Cyberball Answer questions about that person’s cyberball experience People recognized they had been rejected and generally felt worse than those who had been accepted. Introduction What is empathy? Ability to take on another’s perspective of a situation (cognitive) and to experience an emotional response pertinent to the other’s well-being (affective) (Borke, 1973; Eisenberg & Miller, 1987) Components of empathy include sharing emotions, perspective taking, sympathy, empathic concern, personal distress, emotion regulation Empathy and Identification Empathy for another requires previous experiences similar in nature (Aragno, 2008; Batson, Fultz, & Shoenrade, 1987) Perceived similarity may play a role in recognition of emotions in another person (Markin, 2011) Level of identification with another can influence estimates of pain (Nordgren, Banas, & MacDonald, 2011) People watching a person being ostracized report remembering their own experiences of rejection (Masten, Eisenberger, Pfeifer, & Dapretto, 2010) Racial Empathy Gap Empathy for out-group members increases when participants are asked to mimic out-group members (Gutsell & Inzlicht, 2010) Empathy for pain for in-group/out-group members has largely focused on physical pain. Pain from social rejection is processed similarly to physical pain (Eisenberger & Lieberman, 2004; MacDonald & Leary, 2005) Do people feel empathy for social rejection similarly to physical pain? Could rejection be a special case? People who experienced rejection were less likely to show empathy for another rejected individual (DeWall & Baumeister, 2006) Rejection decreases prosocial behavior (Twenge, Baumeister, DeWall, Ciarocco, & Bartels, 2007) Rejection disrupts emotional processes and “soaks up” cognitive resources (Baumeister, DeWall, Ciarocco, & Twenge, 2005) Rejection increases aggressive behavior (Gaertner, Iuzzini, & O’Mara, 2008) Does rejection disrupt the process of empathy? Conclusions and Future Directions Identification Hypothesis White participants were more empathic for the white target after rejection than minority participants. Perhaps rejection may make people more attuned to similarities and differences. Does rejection disrupt empathy? Not necessarily. When participants were racially similar to the target, having had a similar rejection experience increased empathy. Future directions: Replicate the current study with a video to see if people differ in their empathy after rejection for an African American female. How does being different from the target affect empathy? How badly does she feel? We created a composite variable consisting of the anger and depression subscales on the POMS and questions addressing how they believed the target felt about herself, how powerful she felt, and how included she felt. There was a significant difference based on race, F (1,193) = 8.57, p < .01, with white students predicting that the target felt worse. There was not a significant effect based on condition. Participants 205 participants 148 female, 57 male 60.5% European American, 39.5% Minority People were randomly assigned to an exclusion condition: 52.2% Acceptance Condition 47.8% Rejected Condition
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.