Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Performance Monitoring and Development of Common Data Platforms

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Performance Monitoring and Development of Common Data Platforms"— Presentation transcript:

1 Performance Monitoring and Development of Common Data Platforms
  Jason Nelson Assistant NCAT Research Engineer Chelsea Hanson MnDOT Research Engineer

2 Outline Data collection activities and schedule
US 169/CSAH 8 Pavement preservation and MnROAD Cracking Group sections Overview of Pathways 3D data collection van and data analysis Preliminary ride data (before and after construction) NCAT data collection

3 Common Activities Joint Planning Meeting with Sponsors
Performance Monitoring Dedicated Pathways Van Cracking Rutting Ride Texture Every 2 weeks beginning Spring/Summer 2017 Database Utilize the MnROAD common database with NCAT Common Analysis at NCAT

4 Data Collection Schedule
Data to be Collected Frequency Analysis Cracking Bi Weekly (Van Survey) Video Manual Distress (monthly, office workstation) Manual Distress (field review – quarterly) AutoCrack (Bi Weekly, office workstation) Rutting Bi Weekly, office workstation Ride Texture FWD Quarterly Falling Weight Deflectometer GPR As Needed Ground Penetrating Radar WIM Continuously Weigh – in - Motion

5 Digital Inspection Vehicle
Equipment Pathway Services Digital Inspection Vehicle

6 3D Laser System 3D Camera Linescan Lasers Macrotexture Laser
Digital image of roadway 3D Linescan Camera gives us a 3D image of roadway (measures rutting)

7 2D Digital Image of Roadway
Digital Image of Roadway: (Used to conduct surface ratings at workstation) 3D Image of Roadway: (lighter=roadway close to you, darker=further away) Gives you visual of rutting Surface rating identifies distresses on pavement surface 3D Image allows user to identify rutting in pavement section as well as cracking distresses 3D Image of Roadway 2D Digital Image of Roadway

8 Cell 0, US 169

9 2D Digital Image of Roadway
3D Image of Roadway

10 Digital Cameras Film Front and Right Shoulder View
Profiler bar collects Ride and Roughness Data (reports IRI) Profiler

11 MnDOT Experience 15+ years’ experience with Pathway equipment
1997: First Pathway van, using VCR’s to record images. 2005: Two new vans purchased and began surveying counties. Started using digital cameras and scanning lasers in back of van for rutting. 2011: Two new vans with 3D technology. Special thanks to Pavement Management office Dave Janisch, Shelly Pedersen, Elaine Miron, Mark Resemius, Gary Wallner, Tom Nordstrom

12 Data Collection Pre-construction collection: July 22
Post-construction collection : October 14 US 169 and CSAH 8 Post-construction run on Cracking Group Cells TBD After open to traffic, beginning of November Second run on Preservation sections in November, weather permitting

13 Preliminary Results

14 Chip Sealing Northern Low Traffic Preservation CSAH-8
Single, double, triple. With fibers. With a rejuvenating emulsion. Under microsurfacing. Under Thinlay. Section 2 Single Chip Seal (FA2.5) over Crack Seal / Transverse Mastic Section 3 Single Chip Seal (FA 2.5) Section 4 Microsurfacing (Type-III) over Single Chip Seal (FA 2.5) Section 5 Double Chip Seal (FA 2 over FA 2.5) Section 6 Triple Chip Seal (FA 2 over FA 2.5 over CA-70) Section 7 Fibermat Chip Seal (FA 2.5) Section 16 Thinlay Overlay (ABR over fibermat (FA 2.5) Section 18 Thinlay Overlay (ABR over Chip Seal (FA 2.5)

15 Microsurfacing Northern Low Traffic Preservation CSAH-8 Section 4
Microsurfacing (Type-III) over Single Chip Seal (FA 2.5) Section 8 Microsurfacing (Type III) over Fibermat Chip Seal (FA 2.5) Section 9 Microsurfacing (Type III) over Scrub Seal (FA 2.5) Section 11 Microsurfacing (Type II) over crack seal and Transverse Mastic Section 12 Microsurfacing (Type II) Section 13 Double Microsurfacing (Type II over Type II)

16 Thinlay Overlays Northern Low Traffic Preservation CSAH-8
Preliminary experiment design of northern MnDOT sections Section 16 Thinlay Overlay (ABR over fibermat (FA 2.5)) Section 17 Thinlay Overlay (ABR over Scrub Seal (FA 2.5)) Section 18 Thinlay Overlay (ABR over Chip Seal (FA 2.5)) Section 23 Thinlay Overlay Virgin (4.75 mm) Section 24 Thinlay Overlay ABR(4.75 mm with RAP and RAS) Section 28 Ultra Thin Bonded Wearing Coarse Section 29 Thinlay Overlay (4.75 mm with RAP and RAS) Delta S 16

17 Chip Sealing Northern High Traffic Preservation US 169
Single, double, triple. With fibers. With a rejuvenating emulsion. Under microsurfacing. Under Thinlay. Section 2 Single Chip Seal (FA2.5) over Crack Seal / Transverse Mastic Section 3 Single Chip Seal (FA 2.5) Section 4 Double Chip Seal (FA 2 over FA 2.5) Section 5 Triple Chip Seal (FA 2 over FA 2.5 over CA-50/70) Section 10 Fibermat Chip Seal (FA 2.5)

18 Microsurfacing Northern High Traffic Preservation US 169 Section 6
Microsurfacing (Type-II) over Single Chip Seal (FA 2.5) Section 7 Microsurfacing (Type II) over Crack Seal /Transverse Mastic Section 8 Microsurfacing (Type II with fibers) Section 9 Double Microcurfacing (Type II over Type II) Section 11 Microsurfacing (Type II) over Fibermat Chip Seal (FA 2.5) Section 12 Microsurfacing (Type II) over Scrub Seal (FA 2.5)

19 Thinlay Overlays Northern High Traffic Preservation US 169
Preliminary experiment design of northern MnDOT sections Section 22 Thinlay Overlay (ABR with Delta S) Section 23 Thinlay Overlay (Virgin) Section 24 Ultra Thin Bonded Wearing Course Section 25 Thinlay Overlay (HiMA) Section 26 Thinlay Overlay ABR Section 27 Thinlay Overlay (ABR over Chip Seal (FA 2.5)) 19

20 Preliminary Ride Data Northern Cracking Group Cells 16-23
LISA (Lightweight Internal Surface Analyzer) Preliminary experiment design of northern MnDOT sections Cell 16 20% RAP, 5% Shingles Cell 17 10% RAP, 5% Shingles Cell 18 20% RAP Cell 19 20% RAP, 3% Design Air Voids Cell 20 30% RAP Cell 21 20% RAP, Typical MnDOT Mix Cell 22 20% RAP, Limestone Mix Cell 23 15% RAP, Highly Modified Binder 20

21 Data Sharing Currently working on setting up common data sharing practices Development of results database Continued open communication between both organizations Common analysis at NCAT Jason Nelson, Assistant Research Engineer with NCAT

22 Distress Data Collection Preservation Treatments Southern Sections

23 Pathway Van – Class 1 Profiler
HD perspective camera Three single-point lasers for roughness and rutting

24 Pathway Van – Class 1 Profiler
Linescan cameras

25 Pathway Database – *.sec

26 Data Collection Parameter Track Lee Road 159 US-280 Roughness Weekly
Rutting Macrotexture Crack Mapping Monthly+ FWD Monthly Quarterly Surface Friction Permeability - Noise Road closure needed to collect all but automated on US-280/US-431. 26

27 IRI – Control Sections

28 IRI – Chip Seals

29 IRI – OGFSC Sections

30 Jason Nelson 277 Technology Parkway Auburn, AL 36830
Assistant Research Engineer 277 Technology Parkway Auburn, AL Phone: (334) Cell: (334)


Download ppt "Performance Monitoring and Development of Common Data Platforms"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google