1. Protection of the clean athlete is a shared responsibility
ANOC General Assembly
Good morning…good afternoon…
I am pleased to be here with you today…
Sir Craig Reedie, President
November 2, 2017, Prague

2. Protection of the clean athlete is a shared responsibility…
WADA’s Role
NOC’s Role
Ensures harmonized anti-doping rules and regulations; and
Monitors compliance with these of all Anti-Doping Organizations (ADOs) worldwide.
Adhere to Code Article 20.4;
Act as NADO if none exists in country;
NOC also responsible for full implementation of Code compliant programs (Code Article 20.5).
In keeping with my presentation’s title, ‘protection of the clean athlete is a shared responsibility’.
WADA’s role is to partner in order to:
ensure harmonized anti-doping rules and regulations (Code, Standards and policies); and
monitor compliance with these rules and regulations of all Anti-Doping Organizations (ADOs) worldwide.
NOC’s role is to:
Adhere to all responsibilities outlined in Code Article 20.4, which will be explained in more detail in the next slides
If there is no NADO established in a country, the NOC must fulfil this role and act as the NADO, thus ensuring the full implementation of anti-doping programs in the country.
Together we must build athlete and public confidence and trust in the system.

3. NOC Responsibilities -- Code Article 20.4
Ensure policies and rules conform with Code.
Require, as a condition of membership/recognition, that all National Federations’ (NFs) policies and rules comply with Code.
Require NFs to report potential Anti-Doping Rule Violation (ADRV) information; and, to cooperate with ADO investigations.
Require, as a condition of participation, that Athletes and Athlete Support Personnel are bound by the rules.
These are the ‘standard’ NOC responsibilities as outlined under Article 20.4 of the Code:
Ensure its anti-doping policies and rules conform with the Code.
Require, as a condition of membership/recognition, that all National Federations’ policies and rules are in compliance with the Code.
Require NFs to report any information related to an anti-doping rule violation to their NADO and IF and cooperate with investigations conducted by any ADO with the authority to do so.
Require, as a condition of participation, that Athletes and Athlete Support Personnel are submitted to the anti-doping rules. This includes those athletes who are not regular members of an NF but may participate in the Olympic Games.

4. NOC Responsibilities -- Code Article 20.4 (Cont.)
Withhold funding to any Athlete or Support Personnel during period of ineligibility for an ADRV.
Withhold funding to NFs that are not in compliance with the Code.
Pursue all potential ADRVs within its jurisdiction.
Promote anti-doping education.
Cooperate with other relevant organizations.
Have disciplinary rules in place to prevent Support Personnel who are using Prohibited Substances or Methods from working with Athletes.
Withhold some or all funding to any athlete or athlete support personnel during their period of ineligibility for an ADRV.
Withhold some or all funding to its member or recognized NFs that are not in compliance with the Code.
Vigorously pursue all potential ADRVs within its jurisdiction, including investigations on Athlete Support Personnel.
Promote anti-doping education, including requiring NFs to conduct education in coordination with its NADO.
Cooperate with relevant national organizations and agencies and other ADOs.
Have disciplinary rules in place to prevent athlete support personnel who are using Prohibited Substances or Methods without valid justification from providing support to athletes within the NOC’s authority.

5. NOC Responsibilities -- Code Article 20.4 (Cont.)
Work with their Government to establish a NADO if one does not exist.
Cooperate with, and respect the autonomy, of the NADO.
Work with their Government to establish a NADO if one does not exist in the country.
If there is a NADO, the NOC shall cooperate with it, and at the same time respect its autonomy.

6. NOC Responsibilities if NADO does not exist -- Code Article 20.5
Assume all NADO responsibilities if one does not exist in country, including:
Testing and Investigations
Education
Results Management
Therapeutic Use Exemptions
As mentioned earlier, if there is no NADO in the country, the NOC shall fulfill the responsibility of a NADO.
This includes ensuring full implementation of a Code compliant anti-doping program, which involves:
Conducting an in-competition and out-of-competition testing program;
Having investigation processes in place to manage information and intelligence;
Conducting education programs, including values-based education;
Have a results management process in place to deal with potential anti-doping rules violations; and
Having a thorough process in place to address Therapeutic Use Exemption applications.

7. Current Anti-Doping Landscape
206 NOCs:
141 countries have established NADOs
65 NOCs acting as NADOs in their country
Regional Anti-Doping Organizations (RADOs) were established to assist NOCs and NADOs to fulfill their Code responsibilities:
16 RADOs involving 132 countries (and therefore NOCs)
If country is part of RADO, NOC has responsibility, in cooperation with Government, to maintain an active/supportive role with their RADO (Code Article )
To provide an overview of the current anti-doping landscape, out of the 206 countries where there is a NOC, 141 of these countries have officially established a NADO through the signing of the Code Acceptance Form.
For the remaining 65 countries, the NOC is acting as the NADO.
As outlined in my previous slides, the NOC has many responsibilities regardless of whether there is a NADO in the country or not.
To assist NOCs (and NADOs) in fulfilling these responsibilities, Regional Anti-Doping Organizations (RADOs) were established.
RADOs involve a group of countries getting together to form a regional organization where they can work together and pool resources and expertise for anti-doping programs.
Currently there are 16 RADOs involving 132 countries (and therefore NOCs) throughout the world.
For RADO member countries, the respective NOCs have the responsibility, in cooperation with their GOV, to maintain an active and supportive role with their respective RADO (as outlined in the Code).

8. RADOs, including NOCs, must be committed to work together…
While NOCs/NADOs are responsible for ensuring they maintain compliance with the Code, a RADO can assist with program implementation.
For this to work, RADO member countries, including the NOCs, must be committed to working together.
RADOs are not Code signatories; therefore it is the country’s NOC/NADO that is responsible for its own compliance with the Code.
However, membership to a RADO can assist with program implementation.
For this to work effectively, RADO member countries, including the NOCs, must be committed to working together.

9. How RADOs support NOCs Adopt RADO Anti-Doping Rules
Delegate various areas of program implementation
Access training and capacity building to develop local expertise
Obtain Testing Grants to conduct testing
Use the RADO Committees and processes
Therapeutic Use Exemptions
Results Management
Receive education materials and programs
In terms of how RADOs support NOCs…
Through their RADO membership, RADO member countries can:
Adopt Code compliant RADO Anti-Doping Rules and apply them in their country.
Delegate some or all of the program implementation to the RADO.
Access to training and capacity building opportunities to develop local expertise (i.e. Doping Control Officers, Education Officers, etc)
Obtain a Testing Grant to conduct a small number of targeted out of competition tests based on their risk assessment.
Use the RADO Committees and processes for TUEs and Results Management
Receive assistance with their Education programs

10. Global events SHARPENED wada’s focus ON KEY PRIORITIES …

11. WADA is focused on key priorities for 2017 and beyond
Strengthen WADA’s capability for investigations, including whistleblower program
Further developing and implementing a strong WADA-led Compliance Monitoring Program with sanctions for Signatories through International Standard
Increase and enhance research-led anti-doping education, including International Standard
Review the laboratory model and strengthen the laboratory accreditation process
Work with NADOs/RADOs/IFs to enhance anti-doping capacity
At WADA’s November 2016 Foundation Board meeting, the Board reached consensus on a series of recommendations aimed at equipping the Agency with the tools it needs to fulfill its mission as the global independent leader of clean sport.
These recommendations shaped WADA’s strategic priorities for 2017 and beyond
Strengthen WADA’s capability for investigations, including whistleblower program
Develop and implement a strong WADA-led Compliance Monitoring Program with sanctions for Signatories through International Standard
Increase and enhance research-led anti-doping education, including International Standard
Review the laboratory model and strengthen the laboratory accreditation process
Work with NADOs/RADOs/IFs to enhance anti-doping capacity

12. WADA is focused on key priorities for 2017 and beyond (Cont.)
Further develop the Athlete Biological Passport Program
Further develop scientific-based knowledge, i.e. Prohibited List, prevalence, etc.
Ensure that the new Anti-Doping Administration and Management System (ADAMS) works technically and securely
Manage the outcomes of the McLaren Investigation
Increase commitments and financial support from government, sport and other sources in light of expanded role
Further develop the Athlete Biological Passport Program
Further develop scientific-based knowledge, i.e. Prohibited List, prevalence, etc.
Ensure that the new Anti-Doping Administration and Management System (ADAMS) works technically and securely
Manage the outcomes of the McLaren Investigation
Increase commitments and financial support from government, sport and other sources in light of expanded role

13. the status with russia
One of our key priorities is to manage the outcomes of the McLaren Investigation; and of course support RUSADA in their return to compliance with the Code.

14. The Status with Russia
Since November 2015, WADA has been working to rebuild a credible, and sustainable, anti-doping program in Russia.
In June 2017, WADA permitted RUSADA to plan and coordinate testing.
In August 2017, WADA published the RUSADA Roadmap to Code Compliance. Two critical elements remain:
To publicly accept the reported outcomes of the McLaren Investigation; and
Access to the stored samples in the Moscow Laboratory, including electronic data, from
For just under two years, WADA and its partners have been working very hard to rebuild a credible, and sustainable, anti-doping program in Russia that will ensure the protection of clean athletes inside and outside of the country.
On 27 June 2017, as endorsed by the Foundation Board, WADA and the Compliance Review Committee permitted RUSADA to plan and coordinate testing further to their having fulfilled certain criteria. It is authorized to do so, using its trained Doping Control Officers, under the supervision of WADA-appointed International Experts and in collaboration with UK Anti-Doping Agency.
On 2 August 2017, WADA published the RUSADA Roadmap to Code Compliance, which outlines the reinstatement criteria that RUSADA must fulfill before WADA’s independent Compliance Review Committee (CRC) would recommend, to WADA’s Foundation Board, that they be declared compliant again with the Code. The Roadmap has been developed and agreed with RUSADA; as well as, the Ministry of Sport, the National Olympic Committee and the Independent Public Anti-Doping Commission.
 WADA has not deviated from the agreed Roadmap.
In particular, two critical elements remain:
That the responsible authorities for anti-doping in Russia must publically accept the reported outcomes of the McLaren Investigation; and
That the Russian Government must provide access for appropriate entities to the stored samples in the Moscow Laboratory, including electronic data., which are sealed off due to a Federal investigation.

15. The Status with Russia (Cont.)
End-September, WADA conducted an audit of RUSADA.
On 24 October, WADA’s independent Compliance Review Committee held a special meeting to hear from WADA’s audit team, and from one of the two WADA Independent Experts in Russia.
At 16 November Foundation Board meeting, the CRC will make a recommendation as to whether or not RUSADA should be reinstated.
At the end of September, WADA conducted an audit of RUSADA. WADA’s independent Compliance Review Committee will hold a special meeting on 24 October 2017 to hear from WADA’s audit team, and from one of the two WADA Independent Experts in Russia. The CRC will then make a recommendation to the November 2017 Board as to whether or not RUSADA should be reinstated.
 Even once RUSADA regains compliance, they will be required to fulfil some post compliance conditions; including, continued funding for the two International Experts working in RUSADA until the end of their mandate; and, other conditions that will be determined based on the results of WADA audits – the first of which that would occur four months after reinstatement.
 WADA has made it clear that RUSADA must continue working towards establishing a credible anti-doping program and towards regaining Code compliance in the interest of all clean athletes worldwide. Beyond this, we expect Russia to work at changing the culture within their national sports federations by, for example, implementing robust education programs with a particular focus on coaches. The Process is complex and takes time.
WADA is working as effectively and quickly as possible to ensure protection of the clean athlete – in particular in the lead-up to PyeongChang. 

16. Further Developing and implementing a strong WADA-led Compliance Monitoring Program

17. The evolution of WADA’s Compliance Monitoring Program
2014 and 2015 focused on implementing Code and Standards into rules, regulations, legislation and programs.
2016 focus shifted to ensuring quality programs by Signatories.
2017 focus shifted to ensuring their compliance.
As it relates more generally to compliance, our priority is to develop and implement a strong WADA-led compliance program that includes meaningful and proportionate sanctions for non-compliance by Signatories through a new International Standard.
In 2014 and 2015, the anti-doping community focused its efforts towards the ambitious task of implementing the 2015 Code and Standards in rules, regulations and legislation.
Also in 2015, WADA established a Compliance Review Committee (CRC) to monitor Anti-Doping Organizations’ compliance with the Code.
This independent, non-political, body provides advice, guidance and recommendations to WADA’s Foundation Board on compliance matters.
The Committee is composed of compliance specialists from non-sporting industries, as well as representatives of athletes, governments and sport.
In 2016, WADA shifted its focus to ensuring that Signatories have quality anti-doping programs; while, in 2017 and going forward, we are focused on ensuring their compliance.

18. NOCs must collaborate with NADOs to ensure quality anti-doping programs
CODE COMPLIANCE MONITORING PROGRAM
CODE COMPLIANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
AUDITS
OTHER
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
NOCs must collaborate as much as possible with NADOs to ensure quality anti-doping programs in country.
WADA’s Compliance Monitoring Program for IF’s and NADO’s, which is still in its relative infancy, will instill confidence in anti-doping program worldwide.
It is the most thorough review of anti-doping rules and programs that has ever taken place
It is raising the standard worldwide; and, aims to reinforce athlete and public confidence and trust.
We are using two tools to measure the level of implementation of the Code and the International Standards:
the Code Compliance Questionnaire (CCQ); and
the Compliance Audit Program.
These tools allow Signatories to report on their compliance in line with their responsibilities under the Code and enable WADA to assess the compliance and quality of Signatories’ anti-doping programs.
In addition, WADA continues to use other sources of information to validate the information provided and assess Signatories’ compliance, such as via ADAMS, WADA’s results management database, investigations, and any intelligence collected or received.
WADA continues to provide direct guidance and assistance to Signatories in the implementation of their anti-doping regulations and programs while the above-mentioned activities are being conducted.
ONGOING WADA SUPPORT

19. Development of graded, proportionate, sanctioning framework
In May 2017, Board approved development of a framework that outlines:
how WADA supports Signatories in achieving, maintaining and regaining compliance;
Signatories’ rights and responsibilities; and
a range of graded, proportionate and predictable consequences for non- compliance with the Code by a Signatory.
In , there was a strong athlete appeal that Signatories be held to the same high Compliance standards by the Code.
As a result, in May 2017, the Foundation Board approved development of a framework that outlines:
how WADA supports Signatories in achieving, maintaining and regaining Code compliance;
Signatories’ rights and responsibilities; and
a range of graded, proportionate and predictable consequences for non-compliance with the Code by a Signatory.
It’s important to note that sanctions would only follow full support and dialogue with Signatory

20. Development of graded, proportionate, sanctioning framework (Cont.)
Necessitates amendment to a limited number of Code provisions related to compliance; and, development of an International Standard for Code Compliance by Signatories. 
In June, WADA initiated a two-phase stakeholder consultation process.
Seeking Board approval in November 2017.
Aim to have changes enter into effect in April 2018.
This development requires WADA to amend a limited number of Code provisions related to compliance; and, to develop an International Standard for Code Compliance by Signatories.
In June, WADA initiated a robust stakeholder consultation process with the view to seeking approval at our November Board meeting and the changes entering into effect in April 2018.

21. SHAPING A SYSTEM THAT IS FIT FOR THE FUTURE…TOGETHER

22. Thank you!

23. CCQ Results (effective 24 October 2017)
Not completed
Completed
TOTAL
IFs
ASOIF members 28
AIOWF members 7
ARISF members 37
AIMS members 21
IPC members 10
NADOs
Africa 4 49 53
Americas 40
Asia 1 43 44
Europe 51
Oceania 16
5 (1.6%)
302 (98.4%)
307
On 20 February, the CCQ was sent to IFs and NADOs (including NOCs acting as NADOs) with a three-month deadline to complete it online.
The overwhelming majority of Signatories have now completed and submitted their CCQ.
Following receipt of the completed CCQs, WADA started the review and has provided Corrective Action Reports (CARs) to Signatories.
This has been organized on a priority approach, with 69 CARs sent to Signatories deemed the highest priority as of 24 October 2017.
Another five CARs have been issued to the Signatories identified for an audit in the last quarter of 2017 to assist those Signatories in preparing for their audit. The corrective actions are divided between three categories, namely Critical, High Priority and Other, with different timeframes for implementation (three, six and nine months respectively). In addition, and where relevant, a list of best practice recommendations are included in the CAR.
Whilst not mandatory to implement, WADA strongly recommends that Signatories also implement these recommendations to further enhance their anti-doping programs.
WADA’s four Regional Offices have been liaising with all Signatories that have received their CARs, to ensure they have developed an appropriate Corrective Action Plan (CAP).
The CAPs set out a clear plan as to how they will address the corrective actions. Follow-up and guidance is also provided to Signatories in the implementation of their Corrective Actions.
Questionnaire reviews are currently underway for the next priority level of Signatories.

24. Signatory Audit Program (effective 24 October 2017)
CRC asked WADA to conduct a minimum of 10 audits of NADOs and IFs in 2017.
WADA has conducted six with four planned for remainder of year.
Audit Program has already proven effective as a number of Signatories have already addressed corrective actions.
For 2018, CRC has asked WADA to conduct at least 15 audits (pending requested budget increase).
The Signatory Audit Program provides WADA with the opportunity to assess not only a Signatory’s compliance with the Code and International Standards but also the quality of implementation of its anti-doping program.
The Compliance Review Committee requested WADA to conduct a minimum of 10 audits of NADOs and IFs in 2017.
As of 24 October 2017, WADA had audited six Signatories in 2017
Four additional audits are planned for the following Signatories for the remainder of 2017:
The Audit Program has already proven effective as a number of Signatories have been able to successfully address the corrective actions identified through an audit.
Consequently, with WADA’s guidance, they have been able to enhance the level of their anti-doping program in line with the pre-determined timelines established in the WADA audit report.
As for 2018, the CRC requested that WADA conduct at least 15 audits of NADOs and IFs (subject to receiving the requested increase in budget for 2018).
The auditors who form the Audit Teams are a combination of WADA staff and international experts from the anti-doping community.
All auditors have received training consistent with industry standards. WADA currently has trained five international experts with additional experts planned to be trained in December 2017.