1. Month Year
Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
doc.: IEEE /0135r0
January 2008
Co-located interference – comment resolution options to CIDs 591, 1277, 1745, 1746 and 1748
Date:
Authors:
Slide 1
Page 1
Jari Jokela
John Doe, Some Company

2. Month Year
Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
doc.: IEEE /0135r0
January 2008
Abstract
This presentation introduces some potential resolutions to CIDs 591, 1277, 1745, 1746 and 1748.
Slide 2
Page 2
Jari Jokela
John Doe, Some Company

3. January 2008
Comments

4. January 2008
Options
Option 1: Continue with the current draft specification text and try to make some editorial changes to make it less vague.
Option 2: Enable requesting STA to set the interference level threshold
Option 3: Enable requesting STA to set the interference level threshold but enable reporting STA to use different threshold and report it back to the requesting STA

5. January 2008
Options

6. January 2008
Some observations
Option 1: Simple but may be still too vague to satisfy commenters
Option 2: Makes the reporting conditions more explicit. However the requesting STA may not have any glue of correct threshold which may result to unnecessary or missing reports => feature becomes useless.
Option 3: Most complex. May not remove the concerns expressed in the comments.

7. January 2008
Straw Polls
What is the prefferred option (please select only single option)?
Straw Poll 1: Option 1 presented in 08/0135r0 is the best option
YES:
NO:
Straw Poll 1: Option 2 presented in 08/0135r0 is the best option
Straw Poll 1: Option 3 presented in 08/0135r0 is the best option