Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ADVANCES IN WOMEN’S RIGHTS

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "ADVANCES IN WOMEN’S RIGHTS"— Presentation transcript:

1 ADVANCES IN WOMEN’S RIGHTS
Review: What do we already know about advancements in women’s rights? Answer: They fought for and won the vote during WWI

2 Prohibition Ends Women’s groups, like the Women’s Christian Temperance Union, achieved their first political victory In Canada, victory was short-lived: prohibition ended by 1930 Prohibition movement had taught women what they would need to know to become successful in politics. Other groups like the fundamentalist Christians had supported their efforts. Prohibition did have some benefits: many of the problems associated with alcohol abuse were minimized (e.g. crime and poverty rates went down) Provinces began repealing their prohibition legislation as early as 1920 (BC). Only PEI held out (1948).

3 New Roles for Women Attitudes about proper behaviour for women began to change Sought greater equality in their domestic relationships with men Increasingly saw themselves as sexual beings & took charge of their bodies Combined with the advent of the automobile, dating became more private Flappers epitomized this modern, liberated view of women Petting (sexual relations without intercourse) became common No longer needed a chaperone on dates The Flapper style became the new mode of popular dress

4 A Revolution in Women’s Fashions
1910 1920 What are the differences between these outfits? What might the differences signify? 1910: high neckline, corseted waist, long skirt, little make-up 1920: looser, no more corset, low neckline, shorter skirt and no sleeves=very revealing in comparison, heavy make-up Significance: clothes echo the increased freedoms that women are enjoying, attitudes about proper behaviour and dress are changing

5 A Revolution in Women’s Fashions
1910 1920 What are the differences between these bathing suits? What might the differences signify? 1910: Very covered up, didn’t allow women to swim properly 1920: More similar to what men were wearing, allowed more freedom of movement for swimming Significance: athletic pursuits becoming more acceptable for women, women doing things that only men did before is becoming more acceptable, women are pushing the boundaries a little more

6 New Roles for Women Flappers defied traditional ideas of proper dress & behaviour: More revealing & less restrictive clothing Short hair & make up Smoked cigarettes & drank alcohol Stayed out late & went to nightclubs While Flappers saw themselves as the new, liberated, modern woman, others were scandalized by their wild dancing, drinking and “unladylike” behaviour They were criticized by: Women in rural areas—their image conflicted with conservative values Older women involved in the women’s rights movement—thought their behaviour undermined the cause

7 Education & Work Attended college in record numbers
Tended to take “feminine” classes like home economics Many entered the workforce during the economic boom Mostly worked in low paying, “feminine” professions e.g. nursing, teaching, clerical work Typically only women from middle and upper class families could afford to go Wasn’t always about the degree; most would drop out after getting married and usually saw it as a way to meet a good, educated husband A few women did manage to become doctors, lawyers, engineers, etc., but faced great prejudice in the process and were often expected to give up their careers upon marriage

8 Involvement in Politics
More involved in politics, but generally voted with their husbands 1921 election: only 5 women ran for federal office Only Agnes Macphail won her seat Only woman in the HOC until 1935 4 western provinces elected 9 women in total Women thought that getting the vote in 1918 would mean big political changes, but it didn’t bring the changes that many had expected. Even today, women are still underrepresented in Canadian politics Agnes Macphail worked for prison reform in the 1930s, started the Elizabeth Fry Society of Canada to help former female prisoners and was appointed to the Senate in 1954 though she died before taking her seat.

9 The Persons Case Launched in 1929 by the Famous Five: Emily Murphy, Nellie McClung, Irene Parlby, Henrietta Muir Edwards & Louise McKinney Challenged claim that women weren’t “persons” in the BNA Act All 5 women from Alberta—another example of the western provinces being the cradle of Canadian feminism If women were not persons, it meant they could not serve in many important government positions (e.g. Senator) and that they did not have the same rights as men under Canadian law

10 The Persons Case 1916: Emily Murphy became 1st female magistrate in British Empire, but appointment challenged because only “persons” could hold office under BNA Act 1917: Alberta Supreme Court ruled women were persons under Alberta law Famous Five challenged P.M. King to appoint a female senator 1928: Supreme Court of Canada ruled the women are not “persons” under BNA Act Supreme Court of Canada specifically ruled that it did not believe that the Fathers of Confederation had intended for the term “qualified persons” to include women when it came to deciding who would serve in public office.

11 The Persons Case With help from King, took their case to British Privy Council 1929: ruled that women were persons under the law No member of Famous Five was appointed to Senate 1930: Canada’s 1st female Senator = Cairine Wilson British Privy Council was the highest court of appeal in Canada at the time The official ruling: “to those who would ask why the word ‘persons’ should include females, the obvious answer is, why should it not?” In 1999, the Famous Five were honoured with a statue commemorating their victory in Calgary and Ottawa. The statue in Ottawa is the only statue on parliament hill that does not honour a prime minister, Father of Confederation or British monarch

12 Limited Changes Most still felt that a “good” woman was a housewife dedicated to her family Most women still depended on their husbands for financial support New labour-saving devices (e.g. washing machines, vacuums) made housework easier, but increased expectations of cleanliness Lower class women could not afford servants or labour-saving devices as upper-class and middle class women could


Download ppt "ADVANCES IN WOMEN’S RIGHTS"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google