1. Should IEEE 802.11 be proposed as an IMT-2020 technology?
July 2010
doc.: IEEE /0xxxr0
Should IEEE be proposed as an IMT-2020 technology?
10 Nov 2015
Authors:
Name
Company
Phone
Andrew Myles
Cisco
Andrew Myles, Cisco
Andrew Myles, Cisco

2. July 2010
doc.: IEEE /0xxxr0
Does want to join the 5G bandwagon currently being defined as IMT-2020? Discuss!
5G( IMT-2020) is progressing
IMT-2020 will extend IMT-Advanced
IMT-2020 covers many use cases
Should be part of IMT-2020?
Industry is in the early stages of defining 5G …
… but the definition of 5G (IMT-2020) is progressing quickly under stewardship of ITU-R WP5D
IMT-2020 will cover macro cells, small cell and device to device communications
… with key parameters for IMT-2020 likely to significantly extend IMT- Advanced (4G)
Different IMT capabilities will be applied to a diversity of use cases …
… and there are a developing set of expectations for IMT capabilities for each use case
The question for today is does IEEE 802 want to submit IEEE as part of IMT-2020?
There is no explicit proposal today, just the start of a conversation …
Andrew Myles, Cisco
Andrew Myles, Cisco

3. Industry is in the early stages of defining 5G (aka IMT-2020) …
A new communications “generation” has been defined each decade since the mid 1980s
Each generation has applied new technology to new use cases
The new capabilities have driven market demand
1G s
Analog
AMPS
Voice
2G s
Digital
GSM, IS-95, IS-136
Voice Capacity
3G s
IMT-2000
WCDMA, CDMA2000
Voice & Data
4G s
IMT-Advanced
LTE/LTE-A, m
Broadband data & Video
5G s
IMT-2020
Technology?
Use cases?
“5G” not yet been defined by any recognized standards body
It is likely to be more than just than greater data capacity and coverage
Andrew Myles, Cisco

4. … but the definition of 5G is progressing quickly under stewardship of ITU-R WP5D
Andrew Myles, Cisco

5. IMT-2020 will cover macro cells, small cell and device to device communications …
5G Radio
> 6 GHz
5G Radio
< 6 GHz
5G Radio
< 6 GHz
4G Radio
< 6 GHz
4G Radio
< 6 GHz
Small Cells
Macro Cells
Unlicensed
D2D
Andrew Myles, Cisco

6. … with key parameters for IMT-2020 likely to significantly extend IMT-Advanced (4G)
Andrew Myles, Cisco

7. Different IMT-2020 capabilities will be applied to a diversity of use cases …
Andrew Myles, Cisco

8. … and there is a developing set of expectations for IMT-2020 capabilities for each use case
Data rates
1-10Gb/s
Capacity
36TB/month/user
Spectrum
Higher frequencies with flexibility
Ultra-dense networks
Energy
~10% of today’s consumption
Latency
~1ms
D2D capabilities
NSPS, ITS, resilience, …
Ultra-reliable networks
Reliabiity
99.999% within time budget
Coverage
Coverage
>20dB of LTE
Coverage
Massive machines
Battery
~10 years
Density
300k devices per access node
Source : ITU-R 2020 Vision Workshop Feb-12 Vietnam, by METIS project
Andrew Myles, Cisco

9. The question for today is does IEEE 802 want to submit IEEE 802
The question for today is does IEEE 802 want to submit IEEE as part of IMT-2020?
Possible benefits of recognition as an IMT-2020 technology
IEEE would be internationally recognized of as part of IMT-2020
Note: many developing countries rely on ITU Recommendations
Counter: maybe ISO standardization is sufficient?
IEEE would be included in the 5G marketing hype
Counter: maybe Wi-Fi does not need any more hype!
IEEE might be able to access IMT-2020 identified frequency bands, including exclusive as well as shared spectrum access
NOTE: May see increased use of shared-licensing as industry moves to higher frequency bands, and certain countries may require IMT-2020 compliance to deploy in these bands
Counter: is this something that is needed or valuable?
IEEE could be better positioned for IoT space
Counter: IoT positioning requires features and not more PR!
Andrew Myles, Cisco

10. The question for today is does IEEE 802 want to submit IEEE 802
The question for today is does IEEE 802 want to submit IEEE as part of IMT-2020?
Possible negatives of recognition as an IMT-2020 technology
It will take lots of work
Note: recognition as part of IMT-Advanced did not help IEEE , but was a new technology, whereas IEEE has a massive and established ecosystem
Counter: the benefits make the effort worthwhile
Andrew Myles, Cisco

11. ITU-R WP 5D already considers IEEE to be an important stakeholder, but maybe not Wi-Fi/802.11
IEEE but no Wi-Fi Alliance
But other parties are invited
Andrew Myles, Cisco

12. Maybe we can leverage 3GPP LWA to ensure IEEE 802
Maybe we can leverage 3GPP LWA to ensure IEEE meets IMT-2020 requirements
LTE-WLAN Aggregation (LWA) in 3GPP Rel-13 supports aggregation between 3GPP LTE & IEEE at or just above the PDCP layer
If certain “macro-type” IMT-2020 requirements cannot be met by IEEE then we could include LWA as an option in any proposal for inclusion of IEEE as part of IMT-2020
This would allow the proposal to meet the “macro type” IMT-2020 requirements through the licensed band LTE component carrier
Andrew Myles, Cisco

13. There is no explicit proposal today, just the start of a conversation …
Does anyone have more information?
Is there any interest?
What are the next steps? …
Andrew Myles, Cisco