Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Microsoft Replication Technologies

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Microsoft Replication Technologies"— Presentation transcript:

1 Microsoft Replication Technologies
Hilary Cotter Microsoft Replication Technologies

2 Clients

3 Agenda Why Replicate? Alternatives Snapshot Transactional Merge Peer to Peer Sync Services Monitoring Troubleshooting Performance Replication and Mirroring Replication and AlwaysOn

4 Why Replicate? Making a copy of the data/Massaging Data in Flight
Offload reporting Moving data closer to the consumer Scale out/Load Balancing Application requirements Data Aggregation POS Poor man’s DR (missing dependencies, failback difficult) Poor man’s HA (no client redirection, no predictable latency and unpredictable exposure to data loss)

5 Making a copy of the data
Different database Different server Same database

6 Same database – different table
int=1 int begin insert into testTable(Charcol) values(REPLICATE('X',20)) select end GO exec sp_replicationdboption traces,publish,true exec @snapshot_in_defaultfolder=false exec sp_addpublication_snapshot test exec sp_addarticle exec sp_addsubscription test, 'ALL', exec sp_startpublication_snapshot test waitfor delay '00:01' select * from testtaableNew

7 Same database - different schema
SameDatabaseDifferentSchema.sql

8 Same database - 2 tables to 1 table
IndexedView3.sql

9 Indexed View to a table if exists(select * from sys.databases where name='IndexedView') begin exec sp_replicationdboption IndexedView, publish, false alter database IndexedView set single_user with rollback immediate drop database IndexedView end create database IndexedView GO exec sp_replicationdboption IndexedView, publish, true use IndexedView create table Table1(PK int identity primary key, charcol varchar(20)) create table Table2(PK int identity primary key, charcol varchar(20), FK int constraint FK_Table1 foreign key (FK) references Table1(PK)) int=1 insert into table1(charcol) values(replicate('X',20)) insert into table2(charcol,FK) select create view IndexedView with schemabinding as select table1.PK , table1.charcol, table2.charcol [table2.charcol] from dbo.Table1 join dbo.Table2 on Table1.PK=Table2.FK create unique clustered index IndexViewCL on IndexedView(PK) @Alt_snapshot_folder='c:\temp' sp_addpublication_snapshot IndexedView sp_addarticle indexedView, ='Indexed view LogBased' sp_addsubscription IndexedView, indexedView, sp_startpublication_snapshot IndexedView

10 BiDi BiDiv2.sql

11 Offload Reporting Quote from David Baxter Browne (Microsoft)
Support concurrent OLTP and Reporting with Snapshot-based Isolation. Limit Reporting users access to resources with Resource Governor. Reduce the cost of reporting queries with non-clustered Columnstore indexes. Reduce the cost of high-volume OLTP with Memory-Optimized tables. Monitor the cost of workloads with Query Store and Session-level wait stats. And (not a SQL Sever feature, but a computing mega-trend) Supply a single SQL Server with a large pool of Memory, IOPS and CPU resources.

12 Offload Reporting Microsoft preferred method of offloading reporting is AlwaysOn, followed by Peer to Peer Problems Latency – not so problematic with SQL 2016 Reporting Indexes must be on the Primary, punishes writes there. Enterprise Edition feature only Alternatives Bi-directional transactional replication – only 2 nodes Peer to Peer replication Enterprise Edition only feature, limited feature set – no identity property support Need to quiesce when making schema changes Difficult to maintain

13 Alternatives Golden Gate Log Shipping Mirroring AlwaysON
Service Broker Does not scale well to multiple subscribers How to do it? Roll your own Need to implement store and forward and change tracking tracking deletes is hard, CT/CDC options

14 Performance Snapshot Initialize from a backup Database Snapshot
Log Reader Agent

15 Replication Types Snapshot Transactional Peer to Peer Merge

16 Snapshot Replication Point in time image of data sent to subscriber
Best fit when the majority of the data changes at one time Catalogs Price lists Poor use cases Tables don’t have PKs No real time synchronization requirements

17 Transactional Replication
Replicates transactions from publisher to subscriber in a transactional context Store and Forward mechanism Tlog read asynchronously Commands constructed and written to distribution database Markers placed in log saying Transaction X read LSN – log sequence numbers correlates to XactSequence in profiler xact_seqno in msrepl_transactions Transactional boundaries are respected when applying commands on the subscribe 20 rows updated on publisher 20 rows read by log reader and written to distribution database 20 rows applied on subscriber in a transaction. Upon failure the 20 row application is rolled back

18 Transaction Replication
Can Replicate execution of a stored procedure Serializable -- SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL Serializable; Begin tran tran1 Exec Proc1 Begin tran tran2 Exec proc is committed before 1 Commit tran tran2 Commit tran tran1

19 Updateable Subscribers
Designed for the case where the majority of the DML originates at the Publisher Contrast with merge where it is anywhere Immediate - MS DTC – linked server committed at publisher before subscriber Queued Uses queue reader Long standing bug in Replication Scripting adds a queue reader for all transactional replication types

20 Updateable Subscribers
Immediate with queued failover If Publisher goes down Published tables go readonly Deprecated in SQL 2012 Can still use it through stored procedures Don’t use it Small user base

21 Bi-Directional Transactional
Two way replication No guid key required Publisher is also a subscriber sp_addsubscription @loopback_detection=true Faster than merge and p2p Only scalable to 2 nodes Can do three Great for scaling read outs

22 Bi-Directional Transactional
demo

23 Bi-Directional Transactional
Caveats Swapping data Identity seeding Downtime The longer the downtime the greater the probability of duplicate data

24 Peer to Peer (P2P) EE Feature only Bi-directional
Uses a mesh technology Each node can replicate to any other nodes in the topology. A node can drop off and come back on the topology and automatically synchronize SQL 2008 has conflict detection No conflict resolution Smaller feature set the Transactional Replication No custom stored procedures Network saturated at 10 nodes

25 P2P demo

26 Merge Replication Designed for frequently disconnected clients which need to bi-directionally replicate Ideal for POS applications Uses a tracking column (rowguid) to uniquely identify rows across a replication topology Uses tracking triggers to do change detection Merge agent enumerates changes occurring between the publisher and subscriber between synchronizations and downloads changes to either side. Should a change to a row occur on both sides of a merge replication topology the lineage column on msmerge_contents – sync cookie

27 Merge Replication Conflicts Conflict Priority Error
Changes to same row (row level tracking) or column (column level tracking) Conflict Priority Server/Global Client/Local Determines who conflicts are persisted. Server – first to publisher wins and persists Client – determined by assigned priority Publisher changes always persist

28 Merge Replication Conflict resolution
Microsoft SQL Server Additive Conflict Resolver Microsoft SQL Server Averaging Conflict Resolver Microsoft SQL Server DATETIME (Earlier Wins) Conflict Resolver Microsoft SQL Server DATETIME (Later Wins) Conflict Resolver Microsoft SQL Server Download Only Conflict Resolver Microsoft SQL Server Maximum Conflict Resolver Microsoft SQL Server Merge Text Columns Conflict Resolver Microsoft SQL Server Minimum Conflict Resolver Microsoft SQL Server Priority Column Resolver Microsoft SQL Server Subscriber Always Wins Conflict Resolver Microsoft SQL Server Upload Only Conflict Resolver Microsoft SQLServer Stored Procedure Resolver

29 Merge Replication Rich Filtering Web Synchronization
Secure transport Rich Filtering Can filter vertically and horizontally Changes to parent rows will cause motion in child rows. For example if you are filtering on region, and a sales person gets a new region all the child rows belonging to that region will be replicated down to the sales person’s subscription. Termed a partition Precomputed Partitions Partitions are evaluated at run time (when changes happen) as opposed to filter/sync time Can result in very short syncs, but sometimes depending on the hierarchies in the filters can result in longer DML time

30 Business Logic Resolver
.Net class that allows you to Handle Merge Errors Conflicts Update Insert Delete Do things on each synchronization Overhead Stored Procedure Resolver

31 Performance Tuning - transactional

32 Performance Tuning - transactional

33 Performance Tuning

34 Merge Replication Maximize Generations per batch Minimize Conflicts
UploadGenerationsPerBatch DownloadGenerationsPerBatch UploadReadChangesPerBatch DownloadReadChangesPerBatch UploadWriteChangesPerBatch DownloadWriteChangesPerBatch Minimize Conflicts Minimize Concurrent merge Agents

35 Troubleshooting Enable agents for logging Run from the command line
Break up publication For Transactional Replication sp_replcounters sp_browsereplcmds sp_setsubscriptionxactseqno For Merge Replication – tracking changes sp_showlineage sp_showcolv sp_mergedummyupdate sp_showpendingchanges

36 Troubleshooting Limit number of concurrent merge syncs
sp_changemergepublication 'MyPublication','max_concurrent_merge','10‘ StartQueueTimeout Reindex merge system tables nightly

37 Questions

38 Content Only

39

40 Section Title


Download ppt "Microsoft Replication Technologies"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google