1. Impact of NGO Law 1. Mutual Understanding
Government
Authority Power
People
Community Resources Mobilization
CSOs-DPs
Technical and Financial Power
1. Mutual Understanding
2. Increased transparency and good governance
3. Increased trust
4. Increase equity
Sustainable Development

2. Country Context GO Public Sector CSOs Private Sectors Community Sector
Restriction of political control
Very weak public Sector
Stagnation of transformation from CSO to Social Enterprises-Private Sectors
Country System for Sustainable Development
Obstacles in Private sectors or fragility in economic development
Bottleneck in community development

3. Government-Civil Society Partnership
Partnership must be institutionalized, not ad-hoc
Partnership requires clear mechanisms and procedures:
At national level
At sub-national level
Between levels
Civil Society
Partnership Mechanism
National
National
Legislation
Policy Making
Planning
Budgeting
Service Delivery
M&E
Learning
Accountability
Linkages
Linkages
Partnership Mechanism
Sub-National
Sub-National
Services to Target Groups
Institutionalize Mechanisms of Partnership and Linkage to Meet the Needs of the Target Groups

4. National Priority Setting
Global Architecture
Pool Fund GO
CSOs
DPs
Mechanism with clear decision making process and transparent measures
Policy
Guideline
Plan
Budget
M&E System
GO-Authority Power +
CSO-Technical Power +
DP-Financial Power to lead and use pool fund to for poor and vulnerable population and sustainable development
National Priority Setting

5. Principles of Aid Effectiveness
Ownership
Government sets strategy, improves institutions and tackles corruption
Alignment
Donors align behind Government objectives and use local systems
Harmonization
Donors coordinate, simplify procedures and share information to avoid duplication
Results
All partners shift focus to development results and results get measured.
Mutual Accountability
All partners are mutually accountable for development results.

6. Power and Authority
Good governance is the ability to use Authority to stimulate the Power resident in Civil Society and guide and coordinate the resulting actions to create a coherent force towards the achievement of common results.
Authority is correctly vested in Government
Governance institutions have authority but no power
Power is resident in Civil Society
Civil Society has power but no authority
Neither can function without the other
GO has Authority but no Power: must use its authority to empower civil society and guide and coordinate the resulting actions

7. Positive impact perspectives
Positive Impacts
Increased effectiveness of law and policy implementation and enforcement
More contribution to NSDP & Specialized Ministerial Plan-National Priority consideration
Increased coordination and collaboration between GOs & CSOs-Mutual Understanding
More allocation of resources to public sectors
More efficient use of resources in social, llegall, human rights health intervention

8. Negative impact perspectives
Negative Impacts
NGO and Associations
Reduced allocation of resources to NGOs-A
Increased unemployment among mainly young population
Decreased effectiveness of intervention
Poor and Vulnerable
Increased poverty among poor and vulnerable population
Loss of skills and expertise in their livelihood
Increased triple risks to poor and vulnerable population

9. Evident information-Social Services-MoSVY
Government is holding only 21 Orphanages
CSOs are taking care of 248
Residential Care
Government
Strategy
National Standard
Minimum Standard of Alternative Care
Impact Mitigation for OVC
Government are unable to provide services to OVC in community
NGO is covering 78% of communes (1621)
Community Based Care

10. Evident-based Information-Health Services-MoSVY
Total Population:
# of ODs covered by HEF : 54 of 77
Total # of Pre-ID and Post ID Poor: 2,579,321
Total % of Population covered by HEF : 19%
BMC : 3 /4
BTB: 4/5
Kg Cham: 7/10
Kg Chnang: 3/3
Kg Speu: 1/3
Kg Thom: 2/3
KPT: 3/4
Kandal: 2/8
Kep: 0/1
KHK: 2/2
Kratie: 2/2
HEF
NSFCS
CBHI
MKR: 1/1
OMC: 1/1
PL: 1/1
PP: 4/4
PVH: 1/1
PV: 3/7
PST: 2/2
RKR: 1/1
SRP: 4/4
SHV: 1/1
TS: 1/1
SVR: 2/3
TKO: 3/5
Sources: INDOCHINA RESEARCH 2011

11. Evident-based Information-CMDG Best Practices
System of Rice Intensification-SRI
Child Friendly School-CFS
Set Koma-CCWC
Trade Related Assistant for Development and Equity-TRADE
Community Mobilization for Promoting Social Services-CMPSS
Education Management Information System-EMIS
Partnership for Gender Equity-PGE
Clearing For Results
Continuum of Care and Home Based Care-CoC/HBC
All those all best practices and nationwide scale up from innovative projects of NGO and DPs

12. Evident-based Information-Transformation
Commercial, Specialized and Microfinance institutions
Majority of Private Universities and Institutions
Forestry Community
Fishery Community
Indigenous Minority Community
Farmers Associations
All most all those approach and mechanisms initiated and executed by CSO and DPs

13. Thanks
Feedback