1. The Aggregate Expenditures Model11
The Aggregate Expenditures Model
The chapter begins with the simple version of the AE model, that of a closed, private economy. Equilibrium GDP is determined and multiplier effects are briefly reviewed. The simplified “closed” economy is then “opened” to show how it would be affected by exports and imports. Government spending and taxes are brought into the model to include the “public” aspects of the system. The price level is assumed constant in this chapter unless stated otherwise, so the focus is on real GDP.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

2. Assumptions and Simplifications
Not at full-employment
Prices are fixed
GDP = DI
Begin with private, closed economy
No government
No trade
Keynes developed this model during the depression of the 1930s and the model can help explain how modern economies adjust to economic shocks. This is used today to provide insight regarding current economic conditions. Government is ignored, so the economy just consists of the private sector; households and businesses. Assume a “closed economy”, one with no international trade. Although both households and businesses save, we assume here that all saving is personal. With no government or foreign trade, GDP, national income (NI), personal income (PI), and disposable income (DI) are all the same.
LO1

3. Investment Schedule (Ig)
Shows the amount that businesses plan to invest at different levels of GDP
Assume investment (Ig) is independent of GDP => investment is constant at all GDP levels
LO1

4. GDP, output, income are the same
Leakages/Injections
Leakages – Income not used to buy domestically produced goods and services
Injections – Spending in addition to consumption expenditures on domestically produced goods and services
GDP, output, income are the same
LO1

5. Aggregate Expenditures
Aggregate expenditures = total spending
Economic speak
The amount of goods and services produced and therefore the level of employment depend directly on the level of aggregate expenditures
LO1

6. Equilibrium GDP
TABLE 28.2 Determination of the Equilibrium Levels of Employment, Output, and Income: A Private Closed Economy
(1)
Possible Levels of Employment, Millions
(2)
Real Domestic Output (and Income) (GDP = DI),*Billions
(3)
Consumption (C),
Billions
(4)
Saving (S),
(5)
Investment (Ig),
(6)
Aggregate Expenditure (C+Ig),
(7)
Unplanned Changes in Inventories, (+ or -)
(8)
Tendency of Employment, Output, and Income
(1) 40
$370
$375
$-5
$20
$395
$-25
Increase
(2) 45
390 20
410
-20
(3) 50
405 5
425
-15
(4) 55
430
420 10
440
-10
(5) 60
450
435 15
455 -5
(6) 65
470
Equilibrium
(7) 70
490
465 25
485 +5
Decrease
(8) 75
510
480 30
500
+10
(9) 80
530
495 35
515
+15
(10) 85
550 40
+20
* If depreciation and net foreign factor income are zero, government is ignored and it is assumed that all saving occurs in the household sector of the economy, then GDP as a measure of domestic output is equal to NI,PI, and DI. Household income = GDP
Table 28.2 shows equilibrium GDP using the expenditures-output approach for a private, closed economy. Table 28.2 combines consumption and savings data from Tables 27.1 and the investment schedule 28.1.
Real domestic output in column 2 shows ten possible levels that producers are willing to offer, assuming their sales would meet the output planned. In other words, they will produce $370 billion of output if they expect to receive $370 billion in revenue.
Ten levels of aggregate expenditures are shown in column 6. The column shows the amount of consumption and planned gross investment spending (C + Ig) at each output level. Recall that the consumption level is directly related to the level of income and that here income is equal to output. Investment is independent of income and is planned or intended regardless of the current income situation.
Equilibrium GDP is the level of output whose production will create total spending just sufficient to purchase that output. Otherwise there will be a disequilibrium situation. In Table 28.2, equilibrium occurs only at $470 billion. At $410 billion GDP level, total expenditures (C + Ig) would be $425 = $405(C) + $20 (Ig) and businesses will adjust to this excess demand (revealed by the declining inventories) by stepping up production. They will expand production at any level of GDP less than the $470 billion equilibrium. At levels of GDP above $470 billion, such as $510 billion, aggregate expenditures will be less than GDP. At $510 billion level, C + Ig = $500 billion. Businesses will have unsold, unplanned inventory investment and will cut back on the rate of production. As GDP declines, the number of jobs and total income will also decline, but eventually the GDP and aggregate spending will be in equilibrium at $470 billion. No level of GDP other than the equilibrium level of GDP can be sustained.
LO1

7. Planned vs. Actual Investment
Actual investment includes planned investment (Ig) and unplanned changes in inventories.
As a result, actual investment equals savings at all GDP levels.
LO4

8. Multiplier Effect
A change in spending changes real GDP more than the initial change in spending
Multiplier =
change in real GDP
initial change in spending
Changes in spending ripple through the economy to generate event larger changes in real GDP. This is called the multiplier effect.
Multiplier = change in real GDP / initial change in spending. Alternatively, it can be rearranged to read change in real GDP = initial change in spending x multiplier.
Points to remember about the multiplier:
The initial change in spending is usually associated with investment because it is so volatile, but changes in consumption (unrelated to income), net exports, and government purchases also are subject to the multiplier effect.
The initial change refers to an up-shift or down-shift in the aggregate expenditures schedule due to a change in one of its components, like investment.
The multiplier works in both directions (up or down).
It occurs because of the interconnectedness of the economy.
Change in GDP = multiplier x initial change in spending
LO4

9. Multiplier & Marginal Propensities
Multiplier and MPC directly related
Multiplier and MPS inversely related
Multiplier = 1
1- MPC
Multiplier = 1
MPS
The significance of the multiplier is that a small change in investment plans or consumption-saving plans can trigger a much larger change in the equilibrium level of GDP. The magnitude of the change in GDP is dependent on the size of the MPC and MPS.
LO4

10. Adding International Trade
Include net exports spending in aggregate expenditures
Private, open economy
Xn can be positive or negative
Net exports are independent of GDP => net exports are constant at all GDP levels
Net exports (exports minus imports) affect aggregate expenditures in an open economy. Exports (X) create domestic production, income, and employment due to foreign spending on U.S. produced goods and services. Imports (M) reduce the sum of consumption and investment expenditures by the amount expended on imported goods, so this figure must be subtracted so as not to overstate aggregate expenditures on U.S. produced goods and services. Positive net exports increase aggregate expenditures beyond what they would be in a closed economy and thus have an expansionary effect. Negative net exports decrease aggregate expenditures beyond what they would be in a closed economy and thus have a contractionary effect.
LO4

11. Adding the Public Sector
Government purchases do not impact private spending
Taxes are personal
Lump sum tax
Simplifying assumptions are helpful for clarity when we include the government sector in our analysis. We simplified investment and net export schedules that are used by assuming that they are independent of the level of current GDP. We assume government purchases do not impact private spending schedules. We assume that net tax revenues are derived entirely from personal taxes so that GDP, NI, and PI remain equal. DI is PI minus net personal taxes. We assume tax collections are a constant amount and independent of the GDP level (a lump-sum tax). An increase in taxes has an indirect effect on aggregate expenditures because taxes reduce disposable incomes first, and then C falls by the amount of the tax times the MPC. With the addition of government to aggregate expenditures, the economy is now a mixed, open economy.
LO4

12. Government Purchases and Eq. GDP
TABLE 28.4 The Impact of Government Purchases on Equilibrium GDP
(1)
Real Domestic Output and Income
(GDP=DI), Billions
(2)
Consumption (C),
Billions
(3)
Saving (S),
(4)
Investment (Ig),
(5)
Net Exports
(Xn), Billions
(6)
Government Purchases
(G), Billions
(7)
Aggregate Expenditures (C+Ig+Xn+G),
(2)+(4)+(5)+(6)
Exports
(X)
Imports
(M)
(1) $370
$375
$-5
$20
$10
$415
(2) 390
390 20 10
430
(3) 410
405 5
445
(4) 430
420
460
(5) 450
435 15
475
(6) 470
450
490
(7) 490
465 25
505
(8) 510
480 30
520
(9) 530
495 35
535
(10) 550
510 40
550
TABLE 28.4 shows the impact of government purchases on equilibrium GDP. Before adding government purchases, equilibrium GDP had been at $470. Now with government purchases equilibrium GDP rises to $550, implying a multiplier effect since the rise in GDP is greater than the $20 billion in additional aggregate expenditures.
LO4

13. Taxation and Equilibrium GDP
TABLE 28.5 Determination of the Equilibrium Levels of Employment, Output, and Income: Private and Public Sectors
(1)
Real Domestic Output and Income
(GDP), Billions
(2)
Taxes
(T),
Billions
(3)
Disposable Income (DI), Billions, (1)-(2)
(4)
Consump-tion (Ca),
(5)
Saving (Sa),
(6)
Invest-ment (Ig),
(7)
Net Exports
(Xn), Billions
(8)
Govern-ment Pur-chases
(G), Billions
(9)
Aggregate Expendi-tures (Ca +Ig+Xn
+G),
(4)+(6)+(7)+(8)
Exports
(X)
Imports
(M)
(1) $370
$20
$350
$360
$-10
$10
$400
(2) 390 20
370
375 -5 10
415
(3) 410
390
430
(4) 430
410
405 5
445
(5) 450
420
460
(6) 470
450
435 15
475
(7) 490
470
490
(8) 510
465 25
505
(9) 530
510
480 30
520
(10) 550
530
495 35
535
Table 28.5 shows the determination of the equilibrium levels of employment, output, and income with the private sector and taxes. With taxes of $20 billion at all levels of GDP, equilibrium GDP falls from $550 to $490. Again, we can see that there is a multiplier effect. The multiplier = 60/15 = 4.
LO4