1. American Military Engineers
Society of
American Military Engineers
8 AUGUST 2013
CAPT Clifford Maurer, P.E., CEC, USN
Commanding Officer, NAVFAC Southwest

2. Department of Navy Messages
CHINFO NOTES
The Protect/Defend message is important, easy to understand and clearly conveys the basic message about the Navy
Communications should consistently convey this basic message
Reinforce the message with the “deployed around the world” and “ready to defend America” messages
Are easily understood
Boost understanding among target audiences
Viewed as most important
Every activity needs to be filtered through the prism of the Core and Supporting Messages
Does it help to clearly communicate the messages?
And here’s where we are. As you can see…very simple, straightforward language. Messages that capture what we want Americans to know about the Navy.
If you’re asked…whether it’s during a media interview…or during a tour, visit or some other type of engagement, “What’s the Navy up to these days?” …these messages communicate what we want people to know and remember.
You also need to know that – with Gallup’s helps - we tested them and made some tweaks/changes. For example, we had a message that said, “The Navy Fights and Wins America’s Wars at Sea.” The feedback we received was that 1) It wasn’t current….”I’m pretty sure the last battle the Navy had at sea was 80 years ago in WWII” was the exact language….”It sounds archaic” or “a bit 1945ish”…were other comments, and 2) Many didn’t like the reference to war. In the “Be Ready” message we initially had…”The Navy is ready to defend America anytime the Nation Calls.” The feedback was…”It makes me wonder what the Navy is doing the rest of the time, when the nation isn’t calling.”…”sounds like you’re on the sidelines waiting to be call.” So we changed it to “at all times.”
So the message testing was helpful.
Warfighting First
The Navy protects and defends America on the world’s oceans.
Operate Forward
The Navy is deployed around the world, around the clock.
Be Ready
The Navy is ready to defend America at all times. 2 2

3. Department of Defense Design and Construction Agent
NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND (NAVFAC)“The Facilities and Expeditionary Combat Systems Command”
Verbiage from Strategic Plan
NAVFAC’s unique combination of skill sets define our contribution to our Nation’s defense as the:
Department of Defense Design and Construction Agent
Department of the Navy’s Acquisition and Technical Authority
Facilities Engineering & Construction
Maintenance & Facility Services / Weight Handling Equipment
Facilities Planning & Real Estate
Environmental Planning, Compliance, & Remediation
Natural & Cultural Resources Management
Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection Ashore
Contingency Engineering Response
Expeditionary Infrastructure, Systems & Equipment
Logistics Over the Shore Ocean Facilities

4. NAVFAC SW Area of Responsibility
For cross-BL work on the IPT, functional areas are identified (ie CI, AM, ERN, NEPA, etc), team is assigned by pulling across all BLs and is consistent throughout the planning and execution of project. Co-workers share status so personnel can be interchangeable. The team is assigned at the BLTL level; AOPs/DAOPs have overall visibility/accountability, can facilitate issues and adjust priorities.
Some examples:
 Pier 12 Replacement at Naval Base San Diego - AM reworked to include deep draft dredging; EV Planning prepared EA, coordinated sediment sampling and negotiations with ACOE & EPA on disposal, and obtained ACOE in-water permits; CI PM and DM coordinated design efforts of in-house personnel and AEs; AQ prepared solicitation documents and conducted full and open source selection. Applying lessons learned to NBPL Fuel Pier.
Fuel Pier Replacement project at Naval Base Point Loma - AM assisted with project brochure, 1391 development, and is working real estate issues with private license holder; EV Planning is preparing EAs (test pile and pier construction), is coordinating sediment sampling and negotiations with ACOE & EPA on disposal, and will obtain ACOE in-water permits; CI PM and DMs is coordinating design efforts of in-house personnel and AEs; AQ is preparing solicitation documents and will conduct full and open source selection.
JSF at MCAS Yuma- Planning interpreted 1391s, NEPA (Central) interpreted EIS, coordinated with CI PM and DMs on issues, etc. Coordinated with AQ to develop different acq strategies to meet aggressive award timelines. Applying lessons learned to Navy JSF sites.
Skaggs Island/Centerville Beach (non-BRAC closed bases in northern California) - Required coordination between ERN, real estate, NEPA and CI to clean-up property for successful property transfers.
P822, FY14/15 MILCON for Utah Test and Training Range- will involve planning, real estate, CI and NEPA, tight timeframe.
Marine Corps BEQ Program - CI, NEPA, AM, and ACQ worked closely to develop sound acquisition strategies for the $1.5B program. CI and Environmental coordinated with Camp Pendleton for site selections.
Water and Wastewater Program at Camp Pendleton - AM interpreted 1391s, NEPA developed EIS and coordinated with base environmental services, coordinated technical requirements with CI PM and DMs, and applied lessons learned with each project within the program.
Coastal IPT
Staff
FY $410 M
FY $400 M
Desert IPT
Staff
FY $238 M
FY $180 M
Central IPT
Staff
FY $450 M
FY $280 M
PWD Coronado
PWD San Diego
PWD Point Loma
NMC Balboa
PWD Ventura County
SCI
SNI

5. NAVFAC Commitment to Safety
Foster a culture of safety where every team member integrates ORM into their actions.
FY10 to FY11 to FY12 reduced the DART rate from 1.89 to 1.50 to A reduction of 25% in 2 years.
FY13: Contractor DART rate is 0.52 with 19 DART cases through July 2013.
12 of 18 offices finished FY12 DART free
Fatality on MCAS Miramar Hangar MILCON – 01 Nov 2012
Fatality on MCB Camp Pendleton FSC tree trimming – 03 Jan 2013
Photo represents similar equipment

6. CLIENTS/SUPPORTED COMMANDS FY12 BUSINESS VOLUME = $3,145.1M

7. Challenging Regulatory Climate
The CATEX numbers listed are from FY11. FY12 for NRSW is 800, a good talking point on work increasing.
Four of the five EISs are NBC Coastal Campus; China Lake Land Withdrawal Renewal; Hawaii-Sothern California Training and Test; and F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Home Basin. The fifth is at Fallon and should not be mentioned as the Navy has not released a Notice of Intent yet. If asked, the Navy is in the planning process for another EIS and should be releasing a Notice of Intent in the next couple of months.
EAs, some examples that can be presented include a new fuel pier at NBPL, multiple EAs for updates to Installation Integrated Natural Resource Plans (INRMP), and Range Expansion out at Fallon. These have already gone out for public review.
Agency Inspection Days by Region
NEPA/Environmental Planning
SW has greatest combined media total regulatory inspection days on site
FY13 Navy In Progress:
5 EISs, 2 NRSW
24 EAs, 16 NRSW
Regulatory program emphasis differs from Region to Region
Conservation and Resource Management
Cultural Resources
47 Federally Listed Species
NPS Monterey - 4
NWS Seal Beach - 9
NAS El Cento – 2
NAWS China Lake - 3
NB Ventura County – 14
NAS Lemoore – 1
San Diego Metro / San Clemente Island – 35
60 State Listed Species and Species of Concern
80% of Navy’s Biological Opinions annually
Critical Habitat for San Diego Fairy Shrimp at NB San Diego and Peninsular Bighorn Sheep at NAF El Centro

8. Environmental Contract Capacities
** Data contained herein is based on the best available information and is subject to change
As of 30 March, ENV has awarded/executed approximately $65.7M of the planned $233M. BRAC has executed $31.5M, ERN has executed $16.5M and EQ has executed $17.7M.
The FY13-15 Planned Solicitation values represent procurements that are in progress or planned (and are not included in the Current Contract Capacity). As contracts are awarded, capacity will be added to the Current Contract Capacity column (and subtracted from the FY13-15 Planned Solicitation column at the same time). The planned solicitation totals represent upcoming contract awards to contractors...aka the opportunity for new work.
The values on this slide are accurate as of the end of March. The Current Contract Capacity will be updated again at the end of April (to reflect changes based on project awards), and the FY13-15 Planned Solicitation column will be updated as necessary (contracts aren't awarded monthly).
The FY13-15 contract awards are a mix of MACs, RACs, A-E and single award.
Environmental Contract Capacities
PROGRAM
FY12 Execution
FY13 Planned Execution
Current Contract Capacities
FY13-15 Planned Solicitations
Restoration/BRAC
$217M
$159M
$1,027M
$270M
Compliance/ORC
$93 M
$73M
$156M
$200M
NEPA/NCR
$15M
$22M
$51M
$165M
TOTALS
$325M
$254M
$1,309M
$635M

9. SW EV Procurements Currently Underway
** Data contained herein is based on the best available information and is subject to change
SW EV Procurements Currently Underway
Contract Type
Scope
Location of Work
Contract Capacity/
Duration
Type
RFP Date
Projected Award Date
Environmental Restoration
Remedial Action Contract (RAC) –
Single Award IDIQ; Cost Plus Award Fee
Restoration
SW AOR
$100M/
5 yrs
Small Business
June 2011
1st Qtr FY14
Environmental Compliance
A-E Compliance
Single Award IDIQ; Fixed Price
Storm Water- incidental potable water, wastewater, groundwater, water quality
NAVFAC Wide
$30M/
8(a) CERCLA/RCRA
Compliance
$20M/
March 2013
3rd Qtr FY14
NEPA
A-E Single Award IDIQ; Fixed Price
NEPA Infrastructure
August 2012
NEPA In-Land Desert
5yrs
October 2012
2nd Qtr FY14
- Awarded RAC VI, $100M 5 years Unrestricted
Awarded Desert NR MASC May 2013, $10M 3 yrs Small Business
Cancelled Desert CR MASC, $10M 3 yrs Small Business
As of:8/1/2013

10. SW EV Planned Procurements
** Data contained herein is based on the best available information and is subject to change
SW EV Planned Procurements
Contract Type
Scope
Location of Work
Contract Capacity/
Duration
Type
RFP Date
Projected Award Date
Environmental Compliance / Restoration
Operational Range Sustainment EMAC
Restoration
SW AOR
$100M/
5 yrs
Small Business
1st Qtr FY14
4th Qtr FY14
Restoration 8(a) EMAC
$50M/
Restoration SB EMAC
1st Qtr FY14
NEPA/Natural/Cultural Resources
Natural Resources MASC; Fixed Price
Natural Resources Conservation and Regulatory Compliance
Natural Resources IDIQ; Fixed Price
Habitat Restoration
$40M/
Exotic Pest Plant Species Eradication
$20M/
4th Qtr FY13
3rd Qtr FY14
Cultural Resources MASC; Fixed Price
Cultural Resources and Regulatory Compliance
A-E Single Award IDIQ; Fixed Price
NEPA In-Water Coastal
$30M/
TBD
2nd Qtr FY14
1st Qtr FY15
9/20/2018

11. Secure Automated Microgrid Energy Systems (SAMES)
Energy Program
Smart Power Partnership Initiative (SPPI)
Mission: Reduce costs, increase energy security, and integrate renewable energy through mutually beneficial power partnerships (industry, academia, other government agencies and field offices) and advanced utilities systems integration
Focus Areas: Develop enterprise solutions to reduce costs and increase energy security through:
1) Expansion & Integration of Industrial Control Systems (ICS)
2) Integration of renewable energy and regulatory engagement
3) Microgrid Strategy Development for DoN Application
DRECP - desert renewable energy conservation plan
Rule 21 - we are participation in a group(rule 21 working group) for the rewrite of rule 21 - rules on how customers interconnect to the utility
RMI - Rocky Mountain Institute - CAPT Maurer and Bernie Lindsey are members of their eLab - think tank on transforming the electricity industry
UESC ~$11M
RMe ~$56M
Other ~$7M
MILCON ~$110M
ESPC ~$35M
eMMRP ~$14M
ECIP ~$53M
ARRA ~$2M
Planned FY 13-16
Energy Program
~ $286M Investment
Energy Reduction Initiatives – FY-13 & Beyond
Long History of execution Energy Projects
Much of the “low-hanging” opportunity harvested
Continued Pursuit of Financed Energy Projects
5 UESC projects planned for FY Execution
3 ESPC projects under development
Region/ Installation Energy Plans
Strategy to meet Regulatory, Legislative, E.O, DoD, and SECNAV energy goals
Secure Automated Microgrid Energy Systems (SAMES)
Create and operate a secure micro-grid cluster
Composed of single circuits on 3 installations
Demonstrate the feasibility to:
Manage energy use
Maximize value of renewable energy sources
Participate in energy markets w/o affecting mission readiness
Data Fidelity
Investing in infrastructure, granular view of consumption
Energy Culture / Community
Continue to grow highly skilled Energy engineering staff
Leverage expertise across all products and services
Strategic Partnerships
State & local gov't, industry, PUCs, Grid Operators, Utility Companies, Universities, Labs
Interconnect Agreements, Rule 21, SB843 / SB43, DRECP, RMI
UEOC
NBC
NBPL
NBSD

12. Integrated Product Teams (IPTs): Coastal IPT, Desert IPT, Central IPT
NAVFAC SW Summary
Integrated Product Teams (IPTs): Coastal IPT, Desert IPT, Central IPT
Field Offices: 10 PWDs; 9 ROICCs
OICC MCI-West
Business Lines:
Capital Improvements
Public Works
Environmental
Asset Management
Strategic Drivers:
ENERGY – Independence and Security
GROWTH – Net Gain/Pacific Mission Focus
INFRASTRUCTURE – Pressing Demands
FY13 Business Volume Pre-Furlough ($2.67B)
Coronado Travis
Pt Loma SF Bay
San Diego CP Hosp
Seal Beach CAMPEN
Ventura 29 Palms
China Lake Barstow
Lemoore Bridgeport
Fallon Yuma
Monterey Mirmar
El Centro
FY13 Business Volume Furlough ($2.14B)

13. Long Range Acquisition Forecast - SB
** Currently under review at higher HQ levels as to the thresholds for set-asides **
P1132 Controversy - it is ~ $70M project and it will be set aside for small business since through the mentor-protégé (MP) program there are technically qualified firms and adequate competition.
PCO sent a letter vetted through legal saying you can't protest a pre-solicitation notice (31 Jan 2013)
AQ Determination:
- the (MP) could meet the requirements
- Offerors relied on JV LB partner's experience
- Current factor reads "Offerors who fail to submit experience for all JV partners may be rated lower."
Additional notes:
our source selection factor conflicts with the 8(a) MPP regulations. Within that program, there is no expectation that the 8(a) protégé must have the same experience as the mentor on a procurement - the whole point of the program is to help the 8(a) firm grow through the MP relationship. Secondly, under the JV arrangement, the 8(a) firm must perform 40% of the prime's (JV's) effort. So, if the JV indicates it plans to perform 15% of the work (minimum required under limitations on subcontracting for general construction) then the 8(a) protégé must perform 40% of the 15% (Example: $75M procurement; if JV is going to perform 15% that equals $11.250M; 40% of $11,250M is $4.5M which is what the 8(a) protégé must perform). 13

14. Mechanical Engineering
SW AE IDIQ Contracts
Range
Type
Discipline
Planned Capacity
Planned Award
Status
Pending AE IDIQ Contracts
$1M max. UR
Surveying and Mapping
$7.5M
Aug 13
Negotiating rates
$5k - $1.5M
Waterfront
8(a)
Mechanical Engineering
Final report in review
$5k - $500k
Civil Engineering
Sep 13
Prelim Report review
$500k - $3.5M
$30M
Jan 14
Synopsis in review
$200K - $5MM
SOF Complex
Aug 14
$5k - $3.5M
TBD
Fuels
$20M
Mar 14
Planned AE IDIQ Contracts
Multi-Disciplinary
Nov 14
Planned
Fire Protection
Sep 14
Structural
** Data contained herein is based on the best available information and is subject to change
As of: 29 Jul 2013

15. Regional Multiple Award Construction Contracts
TO Range
Type
Description
Aggregate Capacity
Planned Award
Status
Pending Regional MACCs
$3M - $9M SA
HUBZone/SDVOSB
$99M
Apr 14
PH 1 report in review
$15M - $50M UR
C&I MACC
$240M
Sep 14
PH 1 submittal review in progress
$500k - $20M
Airfield Paving
PH II issued 24 Jul – due 27 Aug
$7k - $15M
SB MACC
Jul 14
Acq Plan & SSP in review
$500k - $30M
TBD
Heavy Horizontal
PH 1 plan issue – 16 Aug
$200k - $30M
Fuels
Analyzing market research
$50k - $ 5M
HVAC
May 14
$500k - $3.5M 8a
Gen Construction
Dec 14
Planned Regional MACCs
Fire Protection
FY15
Planned
Waterfront
Dry Utilities
Wet Utilities
Painting
** Data contained herein is based on the best available information and is subject to change
As of: 29 Jul 2013

16. Regional Opportunities – FY13 QTR4

17. Regional Opportunities – FY14 QTR1

18. Link to detailed future workload… Go to http://www.navfac.navy.mil

19. Learn more about NAVFAC …
1. Visit our webpage at:
2. Go to “Organization” Tab
3. Select desired NAVFAC component
4. Go to “Contact Us/Visitors”

20. We Never Forget Who We’re Working For

21. Questions?

22. Back-up Slides

23. Typical Acquisition Approach
NAVFAC LANT Standard Slide – SW modified
Full and Open Competition
Set-Aside for Small Businesses
Multiple Award Construction Contracts
Small Business set-aside within MACC (at Contracting Officer discretion)
Fair Opportunity within MACC
Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity A&E Contracts
Follow-on Task Orders are negotiated
Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Construction Contracts
Paving, Roofing, Painting, Utilities, other specialty trades
Facility Support Service Contracts
Vehicle Rental, Maintenance, Custodial, Grounds, etc.

24. FY-13 Military Construction
Chart is a summary of the FY13 MCON program. Detailed list in back-up
Project Type
Project Location
# of Projects
Prog Amt ($000)
Pavement
MCB CAMP PENDLETON CA 1
$ 4,790
MCAS YUMA AZ
$ 15,093
Training & Operations 2
$ 78,400
NB CORONADO CA 5
$ 129,416
MCRD CA
$ 11,095
MCAS MIRAMAR CA
$ 26,339
NB POINT LOMA CA
$ 84,385
NB SAN DIEGO CA
$ 56,117
NB SEAL BEACH CA
$ 28,885
NB VENTURA COUNTY CA
$ 12,076
MCAGCC TWENTYNINE PALMS CA
$ 27,400 3
$ 18,825
Totals  19
$ 492,821
** Data contained herein is based on the best available information and is subject to change

25. FY13 Military ConstructionP#
INSTALLATION
Project Title
Prog Amt $000
313
MCRD CA
Entry Control Point (Gate 5)
11,095
1132
CAMP PENDLETON CA MCB
CIS OPS Facilities
74,492
1176
San Jacinto Road Extension
4,790
123
YUMA AZ MCAS
Reserve Training Facility
5,068
378
Security Operations Facility
12,558
566
Combat Aircraft Loading Apron
15,093
113
MV-22 Aviation Simulator Building
3,908
181
MIRAMAR CA MCAS
Hangar 5 Renovations & Addition
26,339
500
SAN DIEGO CA NB
LCS Training Facility
56,117
730
CORONADO CA NB
Bachelor Quarters
71,817
909
H-60S Simulator Training Facility
2,340
229
SEAL BEACH CA NB
Strategic Systems Evaluation Lab Consolidation
28,885
900
VENTURA CA NB
BAMS MAINTENANCE TRAINING FACILITY
12,076
** Data contained herein is based on the best available information and is subject to change

26. FY13 Military ConstructionP#
INSTALLATION
Project Title
Prog Amt $000
Q876
CORONADO CA NB
SOF INDOOR DYNAMIC SHOOTING FACILITY
31,170
Q888
SOF CLOSE QUARTERS COMBAT SHOOTING FACILITY
13,969
Q915
SOF MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS DETACHMENT FACILITY
10,120
134
YUMA AZ MCAS
CONSTRUCT TANK TRUCK UNLOADING FACILITY
1,199
1306
POINT LOMA CA NB
REPLACE FUEL PIER
84,385
2808
TWENTYNINE PALMS CA MCAGCC
MEDICAL CLINIC REPLACEMENT
27,400
Total: 19 Projects
$ 492,821
** Data contained herein is based on the best available information and is subject to change

27. MACC Contract Acquisition Strategy
Sep14
May14
Mar15
May 14
Apr 14
Awarded as of 31 July 13
Planned T.O.
Remaining Capacity (Awarded)
Future Capacity (Un-Awarded) 1
7/31/2013

28. AE IDIQ Contract Acquisition Strategy$M
Aug 13
Mar 14
Jan 14
Oct 13
Awarded as of 31 July 13
Planned T.O.
Remaining Capacity (Awarded)
Future Capacity (Un-Awarded) 1
7/31/2013

29. EVBL FY12 Project Execution Overview
Total FY12 Project Execution $325M
BRAC
$154M
ER $63M
EQ $108M
EQ Breakout CR
$15.1 NR
$23.3 EC
$69.6M
Southwest EVBL Execution accounts for 50% of LANT’s Total

30. EVBL FY13 Planned Project Execution Overview
Total FY13 Project Execution $253.5 M CR
$6.5 NR
$16.0 EQ
Breakout EC
$72.5M