1. Airport-ANSP Growth & Efficiency ACDM-CATFM

2. Daily Operations - AOCC
Daily Operations - AOCC

3. AGENDA Airport Capacity Airport Collaborative Decision Making CATFM
Growth Plans
Challenges
Airport Collaborative Decision Making
KIA Perspective
CATFM
Airport Expectation

4. Airport Capacity Growth Plans Traffic Forecasting
Identify Capacity requirements
Evaluate Options
Costing and Consultations
Finalize Concept Design

5. Challenges Unpredictable Nature of Business
Long gestation period for Capacity Creation
Huge Capital Investments
Stakeholder resource augmentation
Sustaining Operations in the interim

6. A-CDM Objectives Improve Predictability Improve On Time Performance
Reduce Ground Movement Cost
Optimise Use of ground handling resource
Optimise Use of Airport infrastructure
Reduce ATFM slot wastage
Flexible pre departure planning
Reduce Apron and Taxiway congestion
Daily Operations - AOCC

7. Daily Operations - AOCC
KIA A-CDM
CATFM
Daily Operations - AOCC

8. Core Elements Consecutive implementation
6. Collaborative Management of Flight Updates
INFORMATION EXCHANGE WITH CATFM
ADVERSE CONDITION OPERATION
5. CDM in Adverse Conditions
4. Pre-Departure Sequencing
ESTABLISH OFF BLOCK SEQUENCE
Consecutive implementation
CALCULATED AFTER ANALYSIS AND PUBLISHED
3. Variable Taxi Time
SITUATIONAL AWARENESS
2. Milestone Approach
1. Information Sharing
DATA EXCHANGE
Daily Operations - AOCC

9. Daily Operations - AOCC
Information Flow
Daily Operations - AOCC

10. Milestones Improve Predictability Improve On Time Performance
Reduce Ground Movement Cost
Optimise / enhance use of ground handling resource
Optimise/ enhance use of stands/ Gates.
Optimise use of airport infrastructure and reduce congestion
Reduce ATFM slot wastage
Flexible pre departure planning
Reduce Apron and Taxiway conggestion
Daily Operations - AOCC

11. How 1 GAP ANALYSIS – Process Analysis as per Euro Control Standards
GAP ANALYSIS – System Analysis as per A-CDM Requirements 2
System Up gradation to accommodate A-CDM requirements
User Requirement Document for the Upgraded System 3
NEED TO ACHIEVE- Enhanced level of predictability on ground. Linking all Ground Operations together 4
WHAT IS REQUIRED – TOBT from Airlines/GHA
WHAT IS REQUIRED - Variable Taxi Time; EXIT/EXOT at KIA
WHAT IS REQUIRED – TSAT and TTOT from ATC > Pre-Departure Sequencing

12. TRAININGS MEETINGS TOBT MATRIX TOBT TRIALS AMENDMENTS INTG. TRIALS
In-Depth A-CDM Awareness Sessions
for External & Internal Stakeholders
150+ staffs trained
10 Meetings of A-CDM Working Groups; to define process, data integration from ATC & deliverables from every Stakeholders, defining TOBT, Variances , KPIs etc.
Aligning stakeholder’s processes with Airport process, to predict an accurate Aircraft Ready Time or TOBT.
TOBT prediction trials conducted from Sep’2012 onwards till date with Stakeholders in a phased manner
First BIA A-CDM Integrated Trials from 18-22nd March with ATC giving TSAT and TTOT – Manual Calculation.
86% of flights followed the sequence (sample size 30)
Stakeholder were shown results of their TOBT Prediction
Second BIA A-CDM Integrated Trials from 1st July th July 2013.
72% of flights followed Pre-Departure Sequence (sample size 173)
Amendment in the processes / tolerances as per the results & feedback agreed through WG Meetings
UFIS 5.1 sessions for Internal / External Stakeholders
Regular meeting with ATC We have identified, mapped and documented all required SELEX messages for arrival and departure updates into UFIS 5.1
Airlines defined their TOBT Matrix
Trials to validate the agreed TOBT process with each stakeholders.

13. DEFINED VARIANCES PARAMETER1 PARAMETER2 DEFINED VARIANCE TOBT ARDT
+/- 4 MINUTES
TSAT
ASRT
+/- 3 MINUTES
AOBT
TTOT
ATOT
+/- 5 MINUTES
AIBT
ACGT
SAME VALUE
AEGT

14. Daily Operations - AOCC
AIRLINE TOBT MATRIX
Daily Operations - AOCC

15. Continuous Stakeholder Engagement
All Airlines & GHA’s Update TOBT (All flights of all Airlines)
Difference between TOBT defined by GHA/Airlines and AOBT
Acceptable Variance within +/- 4 minutes
Regular meetings & follow up’s with Airline’s / GHA’s
by showing their individual Quality Matrix and sharing TOBT month on month Trend prediction graph to improve TOBT predictability

16. TOBT Prediction
Airlines below 60 % are KA, MK, SV & WY

17. Gap Analysis Nov’13 to Jan’14 Feb’14 to Aug’14 Remarks PARAMETER
No of Flights (Sample Size)
15255
36717
Target Landing Time Variance
1:22
01:36
Difference between ALDT and TLDT
No of Flights without TLDT value
389
1611
4.37% of Total Flights
TMO Variance
4:04
04:03
Difference between ALDT and TMO
No of Flights without TMO Value
415
814
2.22% of Total Flights
EXIT Variance for the flights
01:09
Difference between the AIBT and EIBT

18. KIA-ACDM Implementation
KIA ACDM Progress
Dec‘ 11
Jan'12
Feb'12
Mar'12
Apr'12
May'12
Jun'12
Jul'12
Aug'12
Sep'12
Oct'12
Nov'12
Dec'12
Jan'13
Feb'13
Mar'13
Apr'13
May'13
Jun'13
Jul'13
Aug'13
Sep'13
Oct'13
Nov'13
Dec'13
Jan‘ 14
Feb'14
Mar‘14
Apr‘ 14
May'14
Jun‘ 14
Jul‘ 14
Aug'14
Sep‘ 14
INTIAL PHASE
CONCEPTUALISATION PHASE
TRAINING PHASE
TRIALS PHASE
TESTING & SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION PHASE
PROCESS FORMALIZATION PHASE - AIP
Completed
KIA-ACDM Implementation
On Going
Nearing Completion
System generated TSAT or Manual (Ongoing)

19. CATFM-Airport Expectation
Capacity determination
Compatibility for System Interfaces
FUM-DPI Message Exchange
Collaboration during all phases
Post Operation Analysis – Airports
Daily Operations - AOCC

20. Daily Operations - AOCC
Thank You
Daily Operations - AOCC