Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Quad-Rat Vitals Monitor
Advisor: Paul Thompson Client: Dr. Alex Converse
2
Overview PET Imaging Requirements Existing Devices
Previous Semester’s Work Pulse Oximeter Probe Design Options LabVIEW Interface Design Options Where do we go from here? Acknowledgments
3
PET Imaging of Rats Positron emission tomography (PET) scans to monitor location of tracers in rats Client scans four anesthetized rats at a time Needs to monitor the rats’ vitals _s09/reports/FinalPaperSpring09.pdf
4
Requirements: Quads Vitals Monitor
Client needs to simultaneously monitor four rats SpO2 levels, accuracy of ±2% Heart rates up to 500 beats per minute Respiratory rates of 20 to 30 breaths per minute Rectal temperatures of ° F Non-invasive probes and user-friendly interface
5
Existing Devices Existing devices:
Client currently uses rudimentary devices to monitor vitals Available: Pulse oximeter for mice and rats Over $7000, one rat at a time
6
Previous Semester’s Work
Developed circuit for detecting breathing rate using force sensing resistor Designed and calibrated thermistor to detect temperature Designed Graphical User Interface (GUI) in LabVIEW displaying breathing rate and temperature Attempted to reverse engineer existing Pulse Oximeter Force sensing resistor LabVIEW interface
7
General Probe Requirements
Applicable for rats of varying size Reusable Sufficient blocking of ambient light Compatible LED and Photodiode
8
Foot Clip Pros: Cons: Similar to current device Easy to reposition
Positioned far from the head Cons: Can displace easily Risk of LED/Photodiode misalignment Potential to apply excessive pressure
9
Foot Wrap Pros: Cons: No displacement once attached
Alignment of LED/Photodiode maintained throughout testing Cons: Not adjustable More involved cleaning process
10
Tail Clip Pros: Cons: Easy to attach Adjustable
No confusion over placement location Adjustable Cons: May interfere with catheter in tail Potential to apply excessive pressure
11
Design Matrix – Pulse Oximeter Probe
Criteria (Weight) Foot Clip Foot Wrap Tail Clip Ergonomics(20) 18 12 14 Cost (5) 4 5 Accuracy (50) 46 35 Safety (10) 8 9 Durability (10) 6 Feasibility (5) Total (100) 89 83 74
12
Four Corners with Buttons
Full display
13
Four Corners with Buttons
Pros: Logical layout Important information visible Cons: Extra clicking History graphs incomparable Less robust A sample quarter of the final display
14
Tab Interface Pros: Cons: Uncluttered interface Easy to program
Inefficient Data hard to compare Full display
15
Four Corners with Histories
Full display
16
Four Corners with Histories
Pros: All data on one screen Easy to compare trends Cons: Cluttered interface Tiny on small screen A sample quarter of the final display
17
Design Matrix – LabVIEW Interface
Criteria (Weight) 4 Corners with Buttons Tabs 4 Corners with Histories Ergonomics (45) 38 25 44 Programming Feasibility (35) 26 32 30 Aesthetics (20) 15 18 14 Total (100) 79 75 88
18
Where do we go from here? Finish LabVIEW GUI
Determine how data will be collected from Pulse Oximeter Design pulse-ox probe to fit rat’s hind paw Integrate with signal received from Graduate Students’ circuit Print circuit boards Fabricate housing apparatus
19
Acknowledgements Professor Paul Thompson Dr. Alex Converse
Amit Nimunkar Tim Balgemann Liz Ahlers Nate Werbeckes
20
Questions?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.