1. Romanian Orphans

2. Starter Discriminate stage Reciprocity Critical period
Reciprocity
Critical period
Meltzoff and Moore
Lorenz
Monotropic theory
NS+UCS=CS
Internal working model
Nature vs. Nurture
Negative reinforcement
Attachment
Comfort contact
Food
44 juvenile thieves

3. Bronze, silver, gold
Starter question

4. Bronze- Outline Bowlby’s maternal deprivation hypothesis (6 marks)
Joe was taken away from his alcoholic parents at six months old and placed in care. He was adopted when he was seven years old, but has a difficult relationship with his adoptive parents. He is aggressive towards his younger siblings and is often in trouble at school. His last school report said “Joe struggles with classwork and seems to have little regard for the feelings of others”
Bronze- Outline Bowlby’s maternal deprivation hypothesis (6 marks)
Silver-Explain Joe’s behaviour referring to the maternal deprivation hypothesis (6 marks)
Gold -Discuss Bowlby’s maternal deprivation theory. Refer to the experiences of Joe as part of your discussion (12 marks)

5. Modal answer: bronze
Bowlby’s maternal deprivation hypothesis states that the individual has to form a single continuous and loving attachment, preferably with the mother (monotropy) before the age of 2 ½ (critical period). This attachment will then act as a framework for the infants future relationships (internal working model). However, If the infant does not form an attachment to an adult or the attachment becomes disrupted before the critical period the infant will experiences a number of cognitive and emotional problems including low IQ, delinquent behaviour and affectionless psychopathy. Bowlby’s theory of irreversibility – consequences cannot be reversed

6. Modal answer: silver
Bowlby’s maternal deprivation hypothesis states that the individual has to form a single continuous and loving attachment, preferably with the mother (monotropy) before the age of 2 ½ (critical period). This attachment will then act as a framework for the infants future relationships (internal working model). In Joe’s case, Joe was adopted at seven years old, meaning that he is beyond the critical period. This means that he will not have formed a close attachment with a primary caregiver and may find it difficult forming relationships due to a lack of opportunity to develop an internal working model. Bowlby states that If the infant does not form an attachment to an adult or the attachment becomes disrupted before the critical period the infant will experiences a number of cognitive and emotional problems including low IQ, delinquent behaviour and affectionless psychopathy. Joe is already showing signs of these behaviours as a consequence of maternal deprivation as indicated by Joe being ‘in trouble at school’ (delinquency) and struggling at school (indicator of a low IQ)

7. Possible evaluation: gold
Bowlby’s confusion over privation and deprivation
overemphasis on mother and monotropy
sensible focus on importance of childhood experiences
wider implications, eg changes in child hospitalisation
use of evidence to support or refute Bowlby’s work
Schaffer’s multiple attachments;
studies contradicting the critical period and reversibility, eg Rutter’s Romanian orphan research.

8. Lesson Objectives
Effects of Institutionalisation
Studies on Romanian Orphans
By the end of the lesson I will be able to…
Understand
To describe research into the effects of institutionalisation.
Apply
To explain examples of the effects of institutionalisation.
Evaluate
To discuss strengths, weaknesses and evidence of research into institutionalisation.
Extension: To formulate links between this research and other topics in attachment.

9. Context…
Romania’s orphan problem began under the communist rule of Nicolae Ceausescu who banned abortion and denied access to contraception at a time of severe food and energy shortages.
Many Romanians abandoned their newborn children, leaving thousands to suffer at under-funded, state-run orphanages.
Many psychologists have used this to study the long term effects of deprivation…
Based on what we know about attachment, predict the outcome of these studies…
What would we expect to happen?
How might the orphans behave? Why?
What might the potential problems be with studying the orphans?
However, not all Psychologists agree with Bowlby…
Romanian Orphan studies suggest a very different outcome for children.

10. Put yourself in their shoes..
As you watch…
How do you think growing up in this orphanage may effect the children?
What does it actually mean to be institutionalised? Create your own definition.

11. Institutionalisation
The effects of living in an institutional setting. Institution refers to the place like a hospital or orphanage where children live for a long, continuous period of time. There is often little emotional care provided
What’s the difference between this and being cared for by a family?

12. What’s the difference between this and being cared for by a family?
Institutional care
No attachment figure
Bored
Less sociable
More aggressive
Less intelligent
Not cared for well
Less toys
Less interaction
Family care
Strong emotional attachment
More sociable
Cared for well

13. What does the research say?
This activity is designed to get you familiar with the studies and findings and to help give you an overview of research into the effects of institutionalisation
You have 10 minutes to read through, highlight and start to learn the findings of studies looking in to the effect of institutionalisation (pages 22/23)
Task: add the findings to the handout to display the results of institutionalisation

14. Rutter
165 Romanian children (previously lived in institutions) They were compared to 52 British children adopted by the age of 6 months.
The children were tested regularly for physical, social and cognitive development at the ages of 4,6,11,15.
At the time of adoption, the Romanian children were behind the British children in all three aspects. Cognitively they were classified as mentally retarded.
By 4, most of the Romanian children who had been adopted by the age of 6 months had caught up with the British children. Many of the children adopted after the age of 6 months showed disinhibited attachment* and had difficulties with peer relationships.
* Disinhibited attachment: The child doesn’t seem to prefer his or her parents over other people, even strangers. The child seeks comfort and attention from virtually anyone, without distinction.

15. The Bucharest Early Intervention project
Zeanah et al. (2005)
assessed the attachment in 95 children aged between months who had spent an average of 90% of their life in an institution and compared them to a control group (50 children) who spent their life in a “normal family”.
Romanian orphans were randomly allocated to institutional care or fostering
The attachment type was measured using the Strange Situation and carers asked about unusual behaviours (clingyness, attention seeking)
Findings:
74% of the control group was found to be securely attached compared to only 19% of the institutionalised group.
65% of this group were classified as disorganised attachment.
Disorganised attachment: insecure attachment, the children display an inconsistent pattern of behaviour; sometimes they show strong attachment other times they avoid the caregiver.

16. Consolidation: Quick off the draw…
Teams of 2 or 3
Elect a runner
Runner comes up and collects a question
All people in the group collectively write down an answer, but individually in their own notes.
Answer must make sense and be in sentences.
One person brings their answer to the front for me to check. If correct you get the next question.
First team to complete all questions wins!

17. 1) Who did Rutter study? Be specific!
2) What did Rutter find? Describe his findings.
3) At what age were the effects of institutionalisation particularly negative?
4) Who did Zeanah (Bucharest Early Intervention Project) study in 2005? Be specific!
5) What method did Zeanah use to measure their attachment?
6) In the Bucharest Early Intervention Project, how did the findings of the control group and institutional group differ?
7) From research describe 3 effects of institutionalisation…

18. 1) Who did Rutter study? Be specific!
2) What did Rutter find? Describe his findings.
3) At what age were the effects of institutionalisation particularly negative?
4) Who did Zeanah (Bucharest Early Intervention Project) study in 2005? Be specific!
5) What method did Zeanah use to measure their attachment?
6) In the Bucharest Early Intervention Project, how did the findings of the control group and institutional group differ?
7) From research describe 3 effects of institutionalisation…
165 Romanian orphans adopted in Britain at 4, 6, 11 & 15 years. 52 British adoptees (control)
IQ significantly dropped, mental retardation, disinhibited attachment
6 months – 2 years
95 children (12-31 months who were institutionalised), 50 children (control)
Strange situation
74% of control = securely attached, 65% of institutionalised = disorganised attached
Disinhibited attached, disorganised attachment, Low IQ, smaller head circumference, physically smaller,

19. Discussion: Do you think Rutter would agree with Bowlby?
Bowlby: “If an infant is unable to develop a warm, intimate and continuous relationship with his/her mother (or mother substitute) before the age of 2.5yrs then the child would have difficulty forming relationships with other people and be a risk of behavioural/emotional disorders.”
Rutter argued that the idea of a critical period is incorrect. His results suggest that children can still form an attachment after 2.5 years old; however, it just takes them longer to form one. He argued that the term should be ‘sensitive period’ and not ‘critical’.

20. Exam focus
Answer the exam questions focusing on research methods and Romanian Orphans Extension: Outline the effects of institutionalisation (6 marks)

21. Answer (c)
Bowlby (1946) conducted interviews with 88 children and their families. From 44 thieves. 16 were diagnosed with affectionless psychopaths. 86% of the 16 had suffered early and prolonged separation from their mothers. This was in contrast to the control group where only 4% had suffered early and prolonged separation.

22. Answer (D) Bowlby possible researcher bias retrospective data
inability to show cause and effect
poor validity.

23. Post it note pros and cons
Prompts
Methods Used including controls
Extraneous Variables
Practical Applications/usefulness in real life
Sample
Ethical issues
Long term / short term effects
Causation or correlation?
You have a series of post it notes in front of you…
In groups create as many evaluation points as you can of research into the effects of institutionalisation!
Write them down in short version for now. Just BASIC points, arguments, pros and cons.
Use the prompts at the side to help you!
Pros
Strengths
Arguments For
Supporting Evidence
Cons
Limitations
Arguments Against
Contrasting Evidence
Use the below key terms in your discussion …
Correlational, Retrospective Data Collection, Ecological Validity, Causation
Extension…. push yourself to draw upon your prior attachment and research methods knowledge to draw up your own! Justification is key!

24. Post it note pros and cons
Now let’s try and turn these into effective evaluation (AO3) points….!
Basic (D)
Straightforward & concise points
Moderate (C)
Evaluation points are identified and partially explained
Detailed (B/A)
Well developed points, identified, explained and linked back to an element of the study/theory.
Each pick an evaluation point using your post it notes.
Erase and re-draft to make fully effective points!
Ensure each member of the group has the final version written down!
Use the PEEL structure to ensure they are fully developed. Highlight key terms used in your points!

25. Plenary (exam focus)
Discuss the effects of institutionalisation. Refer to the studies of Romanian orphans in your answer. (16 marks)

26. Overview