Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Tri-annual Review (TAR) and The Audit Relationship

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Tri-annual Review (TAR) and The Audit Relationship"— Presentation transcript:

1 Tri-annual Review (TAR) and The Audit Relationship

2 Agenda Introduction Goals and Objectives Importance
Regulatory Alignment FMR specifics Tri-Annual Review and the Audit Relationship Take Away Application and Tips stmichaelsinc.com | © 2017

3 Introduction stmichaelsinc.com | © 2017

4 Goals and Objectives At the conclusion of this hour each participant should be able to: Discuss the importance of Tri-Annual Review or Joint Review Program Discuss Tri-Annual Review and other regulatory relationships Discuss conceptually how a Tri-Annual Review is conducted Discuss how it ties to a Independent Auditor’s assessment Have concepts you can take away and implement at home station stmichaelsinc.com | © 2017

5 Importance stmichaelsinc.com | © 2017

6 Importance This was developed by OSD (c) for ASMC and other briefings.
stmichaelsinc.com | © 2017

7 Importance Audit Risk = Inherent Risk (IR) X Control Risk (CR) X Detection Risk (DR) stmichaelsinc.com | © 2017

8 Importance Senior Leadership Regulatory Audit
Good use of Taxpayers Funds stmichaelsinc.com | © 2017

9 Regulatory Alignment Financial Statements CFO Act
Sarbanes Oxley-Section 404 OMB A-123 stmichaelsinc.com | © 2017

10 FMR Specifics DoD R, Financial Management Regulation, Volume 3, Chapter 8 Standards for Recording and Reviewing Commitments and Obligations Section 0804 Triannual Review of Commitments, Obligations, Accounts Payable and Accounts Receivable Internal Control Process to validate Bona Fide Needs of Appropriations charged Internal Control Process to ensure compliance with United States General Ledger Standard Financial Information Structure Transaction Library Internal Control Process to ensure Commitments, Obligations, Expenditures are valid and accurate stmichaelsinc.com | © 2017

11 TAR and Audit Relationship
Section 0804 Triannual Review of Commitments, Obligations, Accounts Payable and Accounts Receivable Internal Control Process to validate Bona Fide Needs of Appropriations charged Internal Control Process to ensure compliance with United States General Ledger Standard Financial Information Structure Transaction Library Internal Control Process to ensure Commitments, Obligations, Expenditures are valid and accurate stmichaelsinc.com | © 2017

12 TAR and Audit Relationship
Audit Risk = Inherent Risk (IR) X Control Risk (CR) X Detection Risk (DR) Beginning with the Financial Statements and ask the question: What is the risk of a material misstatement on each line within the respective Agencies reported Financial Statements? stmichaelsinc.com | © 2017

13 TAR and Audit Relationship
Financial Audit Manual Government Audit Standards stmichaelsinc.com | © 2017

14 TAR and Audit Relationship
stmichaelsinc.com | © 2017

15 TAR and Audit Relationship
stmichaelsinc.com | © 2017

16 TAR and Audit Relationship
stmichaelsinc.com | © 2017

17 TAR and Audit Relationship
This was developed by OSD (c) for ASMC and other briefings. stmichaelsinc.com | © 2017

18 Importance Senior Leadership Regulatory Audit
Good use of Taxpayers Funds Help in current year and with other re-programming needs stmichaelsinc.com | © 2017

19 St. Michael’s Experience
Relationships are Key Commander Funds Holder Contracting Officer (Warranted 1102) Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative Program Manager (Govt) Program Manager (Contractor) Task Order Leadership (Govt) DFAS Most have a policy, but not Agency specific Some have instructions or a SOPs, but very few outside the financial shop have seen it (even fewer know how it works) Every 90 days something is done – but is it the same? Are the same people involved? stmichaelsinc.com | © 2017

20 St. Michael’s Experience
Step 1: Establish a single point of contact to be your Triannual or Joint review person or additional duty Step 2: Draft your awareness campaign (and why it’s important), Agency policy, conduct an end-to-end work flow diagram with swim lanes (relationships), and begin organizational change (ADKAR) Step 3: Circulate your draft amongst key relationships (swim lanes) and seek input (relationships); ADKAR Step 4: Establish Commander/Director Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with those offices in the flow diagram/swim lanes; continue ADKAR stmichaelsinc.com | © 2017

21 St. Michael’s Experience
Step 5: ADKAR moves to the forefront and training program begins Step 6: Execute policy and instructions through quarterly scheduled reviews. Place TAR onto the Command Calendar for the next 24 months Step 7: Conduct AAR with those in the end-to-end flow diagram, make improvements, adjust policy, instructions, and SOPs. Step 8: Move from K to building A Step 9: Seek out your R and begin to control/solidify your processes (Automation-ADOBE-Dashboards) stmichaelsinc.com | © 2017

22 Additional Tips That Work
Current OSD March 2016 Guidance has some testing requirements Training (Knowledge and Ability) TAR quality assurance review Follow up—Follow up---Follow up Provide examples of acceptable and unacceptable remarks: Remarks must be of a nature that explains specific actions What documentation is obligation waiting on (i.e. receiving report, invoice, etc.) to process payment? Estimated liquidation date (based on input from vendor, DFAS, etc.)? Contact information of the person performing validation, and follow-up if awaiting update/documentation from other organizations stmichaelsinc.com | © 2017

23 Additional Tips That Work
TAR quality assurance review Accountability/Unacceptable remarks: Use those relationships Use the MOUs and Command(U) Some popular vernacular we removed: Simply stating “valid” or “valid per Mr./Ms. Smith” Obligation is still valid / Obligation is to cover XXXX Awaiting final payment OR still researching stmichaelsinc.com | © 2017

24 Additional Tips That Work
Establish an annual plan reviewing ULOs in line with TAR periods Start with oldest FYs and work backwards Review largest dollar amounts Attack amounts less than $1,000 for de-obligation since no MOD is required by contracting Follow-up – Follow-up – Follow-up Adequate documentation Open Lines of Communication Relationships are key…collaborate commitments and obligations to determine the validity of the sufficiency funding level to support the bona fide need for the outstanding goods and services stmichaelsinc.com | © 2017

25 Summary and Review Today we discussed: Tri-Annual Review Importance
Tri-Annual Review and other Regulatory Guidance Tri-Annual Review relationship with Independent Auditor’s Assessment Tri-Annual Review Tips stmichaelsinc.com | © 2017

26 QUESTIONS? stmichaelsinc.com | © 2017

27 St Michael’s TAR Process Backup Slides
9/20/2018 stmichaelsinc.com | © 2017

28 Appropriation Life-Cycle
TAR Terms Current Year Funds - Verification of the continuing bona fide need for goods and services that have not been delivered to minimize invoicing in future years. Expired Year Funds – Ensures de-obligation of expired funds no longer valid. Expired funds are not available for new obligations. Both the obligated and unobligated balances of expired appropriations must be available for recording, adjusting, and liquidating obligations properly chargeable to that account. Cancelled Year Funds – Verifies canceled funds to return to the Treasury. Operation and Maintenance appropriations are available for obligation for one fiscal year, available for expenditure for the next 5 fiscal years, and canceled at the end of the fifth year after expiration of the appropriation. Canceled funds are not available for expenditure for any reason. However, if still valid the funds will be charged to any current appropriation account for the same purpose. Therefore a solid TAR will eliminate canceled funds. stmichaelsinc.com | © 2017 9/20/2018

29 Appropriation Life-Cycle
TAR Terms Cont. Commitment – administrative reservation of funds Obligation – an order placed with a vendor to furnish supplies and services ULOs – Un-liquidated obligations. (Unpaid, invalid, dormant, etc.) Expired – An appropriation with incurred obligations can still be paid out of the appropriation with no new obligations incurred. Upward and downward adjustments can be made, subject to applicable limitations by HQ SOCOM and Congress. Expired years last five years. 9/20/2018 stmichaelsinc.com | © 2017

30 Appropriation Life-Cycle
TAR Terms Cont. Accounting Stages Disbursement Accounting Commitment Obligation UOO – Undelivered Orders Outstanding AEU – Accrued Expenditures Unpaid AEP – Accrued Expenditures Paid Reimbursement Accounting UFCO – Unfilled Customer Orders FCOU – Filled Customer Orders Uncollected FCOC – Filled Customer Orders Collected 9/20/2018 stmichaelsinc.com | © 2015

31 Appropriation Life-Cycle
stmichaelsinc.com | © 2017 9/20/2018

32 ODL – Open Document Listing
Tri-annual Review – Partial Checklist Example FMA Guidance Yes No N/A Date Completed Have TAR lines been received from DFAS within FMSuite Correctly? Have applicable lines been distributed from FMSuite to Fund Holders/Resource Advisors in a timely manner? Do you have adequate supporting documentation to forward to DFAS for obligation/de-obligation action? Have TAR files received back from FH/RA been completed? (Ensure all lines have valid base codes, remarks, obligation and de-obligation amounts and attached supporting documentation in FMSuite) Has follow-up been done to ensure DFAS processes requests in timely manner during next reporting period? Funds Holder/Resource Advisor Guidance Are you maintaining all commitment and obligation documentation generated for your organization? Do you understand all applicable documents? If not, have you contacted your FMA/Budget/Contracting office for required guidance and training? Does each accounting line reflect the correct line of accounting (LOA), stage of accounting, and dollar amount compared to supporting documentation? stmichaelsinc.com | © 2017 9/20/2018

33 TAR Guidance FMR – DoD Financial Management Regulation R, Vol 3, Chap 8 and DFAS-DE G DoD’s Goal – Increase DoD’s ability to use available appropriations before they expire and ensure remaining open obligations are valid and liquidated before the cancellation of the appropriation. Tri-Annual Review (TAR) Requirements – All commitments and obligations shall be reviewed, whether current or dormant, at least annually in order to substantiate the year-end certification requirements. TAR Reporting Periods - Oct-Jan all canceling funds Feb-May - all expired funds Jun-Sep all current funds 9/20/2018 stmichaelsinc.com | © 2017

34 Steps To Clear UOOs FHs/RAs initiate a written consent of funds to be de-obligated to contracting for funds less than $1,000 then; Contracting officer sends form letter to Vendor for contract validity If contract completed & funds remain over $1,000 then; Contracting does MOD for residual balance over $1,000 on contract Remaining funds are identified in a standardized form letter to accounting requesting to de-obligate funds then; Finance de-obligates funds (notifies DFAS then; Fund line is zeroed out for positive TAR reporting 9/20/2018 stmichaelsinc.com | © 2017


Download ppt "Tri-annual Review (TAR) and The Audit Relationship"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google