1. Platform Informatiemodel Netbeheerders
Developments Dutch PIN Community
for the CIM user group meeting Prague 2011

2. Who are we? Developments 2011 Our ambitions for 2011 CIM governance
Subjects
Who are we?
Developments 2011
Our ambitions for 2011
CIM governance
20/9/18

3. PIN membership and associations
Goal
2010 Milan
5 Organizations
2011 Prague
7 Organizations
Talks with:
20/9/18

4. Who are we? Developments 2011 Our ambitions for 2011 CIM governance
Subjects
Who are we?
Developments 2011
Our ambitions for 2011
CIM governance
20/9/18

5. Together, Dutch Grid Operators Connect
Developments 2011 (1/2)
Covering vision, standards, governance
SECTOR
Standards
Regulators
Vision
Taskforce
Intelligent
Grids
National
Main issue
Standards & Interoperability
Together, Dutch Grid Operators Connect
Re-use
Share
Regional
EU Taskforce SG
International
FERC
Organize & prioritize
Make & harmonize
Regulate
20/9/18

6. Developments 2011 (2/2) 2010-07 Final document Dutch TF Smart Grid
Final public consultation document Dutch TF Smart Grid
PIN input was used for future steps on standards and interoperability
/06 AgentschapNL is forming SG platform. Forseen tasks:
Dutch Conceptual model.(similar to NIST)
Selection criteria for standards and determine priorities
Shortlist of relevant standards for the Netherlands
Ensuring contribution on international standards
(Based on comply or explain on int. standards and best practices)
DSO’s and TSO are no competitors, we seek synergy
Taskforce
Intelligent
Grids
20/9/18

7. Who are we? Developments 2011 Our ambitions for 2011 CIM governance
Subjects
Who are we?
Developments 2011
Our ambitions for 2011
CIM governance
20/9/18

8. Our ambitions for 2011 Support the Dutch SG platform on:
Delivering a set of standards with core and high relevance for the Netherlands (incl. E-Govermental standards)
Deliver a set of business issues which can be supported by those standards. Examples of data exchange:
between gridoperator and regulator (CODATA)
between TSO an DSO
between DSO and Serviceproviders (= Project DURF digital exchange of revision data of grid components and topology)
Delivering a set of selection-criteria for adopting standards
Delivering a development-proces description that can be used by the dutch grid operators.
20/9/18

9. Who are we? Developments 2011 Our ambitions for 2011 CIM governance
Subjects
Who are we?
Developments 2011
Our ambitions for 2011
CIM governance
20/9/18

10. CIM Governance (1/4) Applying CIM… Before: Project Current: Project
Time, knowledge and other constraints
Non-standard interface
Current:
Project
Architecture: use standard
Time, knowledge and other constraints
Non-standard interface
Desired:
Project
Architecture: use standard
Knowledge available
Standards reused
Standardized interface
20/9/18

11. CIM Governance (2/4) Common Information Model Experts organized
Formal representation
Managed by
IEC CIM
CIM model manager
CIMug
IEC 57
International standardization
Regional CIM Profile
Regional profile manager
ENTSO-E Data expert group
ENTSO-E SDC/SOC/MC
Regional standardization
National CIM profiles
National model manager
PIN
NEC 57 (NEN working group)
National standardization
Local CIM
Local data manager
Local CIM experts
Participation in groups
Local standardization
* CIM represents CIM and other standards like 61850, BAG (Dutch), GBKN (Dutch), KVK (Dutch), etc.
20/9/18

12. CIM Governance (3/4) The idea… National standardization committee
TC 57
PIN
Subject representative
Organized knowledge
Organized knowledge
Companies
20/9/18

13. CIM Governance (4/4)
Challenges to the PIN Group and to company standardization coordinators:
How to unite the CIM (and other standards) knowledge in a kind of competence center? How do you organize that?
How to ascertain that CIM interpretations are the same within all parts of the company / group of companies?
How to organize business and IT stakeholders around the CIM? How do you prevent ‘islands’ to be formed?
I would like to come back from Prague with a set of working (or best) practices.
20/9/18