Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byGrace Jacobs Modified over 6 years ago
1
Commissioning progress Stefan Hild Ilias WG1 meeting, Sep 2005
Title GEO 600 Commissioning progress Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut) Stefan Hild Ilias WG1 meeting, Sep 2005
2
GEO 600 layout 0.09 1.5-2 kW
3
Tuning signal recycling to 300 Hz
Better knowledge of IFO parameters: more accurate prediction from simulations downtuning to 200 Hz realized Fixed instability of MI auto-alignment by setting up a new telescope for DWS. We will stay at 330 Hz !
4
GEO 600 design sensitivity
5
Calibration and demod phase @ 300 Hz
Using signal recycling GW signal is split in P and Q quadrature P-response independant of demod phase Q-response only for larger than 20 to 30 deg demod phase compatible with current calibration (zero + complex pole) Decided to use 40 deg for time being. Drawback: ‚P‘ used for MI servo is not really only ‚P‘
6
High RF on HPD / Q-compensation
Q-comp OFF Q-comp ON Observations: Found huge RF level after MI diode (1 Volt) Large DC level in Q after mixing. Q-compensation: Injected RF directly into resonance circuit of the HPD to make Q DC level zero. Improved sensitivity above 700 Hz
7
RF setup OLD setup NEW setup Old setup:
Dominated by phase noise in the LO path (phaseshifter and splitter(0/90°) Due to this noise from Q was mixed into P quadrature. That is why Q-compensation worked. OLD setup New setup: Using a less noisy splitter(0/90°) Using a cable as phaseshifter NEW setup
8
Shot noise Green line is the shot noise level calculated from the DC current of the photodiode. We are within a factor sqrt(2) shot noise limited above 1kHz !
9
Proposed by Rana and others
Future RF setup Proposed by Rana and others GOALS: Using only high quality hardware Guaranteeing high RF levels in all components
10
Noise projections 21st of july
11
Noise in the SR-long loop
PROBLEM Noise in the detection band is entirely limited by front-end-noise (shot noise from the detector). Limits sensitivity from 100 to 500 Hz Large locking range OLG of 10^6 at 0.1 Hz No feedback noise above100 Hz Requirements Servo has a locking mode and a running mode Lowering UGF to get less gain in detection band Using lowpass filter with very steep roll off above UGF (implemeted using a dSPACE system) Solutions
12
Analog SR electronics Red = acq amp, green = acq pha
Dark blue = run amp, brown = run phase Light blue = run2 amp, pink = run2 pha
13
Signal Recycling digital
Hz = -147 deg
14
SR feedback: analog vs. digital
15
SR loop filter future design
Four complex integrators: 2.25 (2x),1.3, 0.56 Hz Filter not used at the moment. Can be implemented when more gain is needed around pendulum resonances
16
Sensitivity improvement July to August
High frequency improvements: reduction of RF phase noise Low frequency improvements: reduction of Signal recycling feedback noise
17
PR-bench Historically grown layout of PR-bench not optimal !
beam clipping too many transmissive optical components too many polarizing components acoustic coupling Goal: Shorten and simplify the HPD path
18
Sensitivity after PR bench work
Removed resonance structures between 100 and 200 Hz.
19
Noise projections 21st of july
20
Michelson length control
< 0.1Hz main problem before coincidence run was range of ES drive however this was solved
21
Michelson length control
< 0.1Hz < 10 Hz Reaction Pendulum: 3 coil-magnet actuators at intermediate mass, range ~ 100µm main problem before coincidence run was range of ES drive however this was solved
22
Michelson length control
< 0.1Hz < 10 Hz Reaction Pendulum: 3 coil-magnet actuators at intermediate mass, range ~ 100µm Electrostatic actuation on test mass bias 630V, range 0-900V= 3.5µm > 10 Hz main problem before coincidence run was range of ES drive however this was solved
23
Using ESD as actuator Force is proportional to square of applied voltage. high voltages are needed for bipolar acting a bias voltage needs to be applied Noise is introduced: loop electronics sqrt circuits intrinsic HV amplifier noise
24
Sqrt circuits in MI loop
ESD: F U^2 Sqrt circuits are necessary to give full linear force range for acquisition. Drawback: sqrt circuits are noisy 1µV/sqrt(Hz) ESD)
25
Sqrt circuits in MI loop
ESD: F U^2 Sqrt circuits are necessary to give full linear force range for acquisition. Drawback: sqrt circuits are noisy 1µV/sqrt(Hz) ESD) Bypassing sqrt circuits after lock is acquired.
26
Noise in MI loop HVA noise = 100nV/sqrt(Hz) (=10µV/sqrt(Hz) @ ESD)
HV-amplifier noise can be reduced by decreasing bias voltage or active noise suppression. Suppressing noise introduced by loop electronics needs whitening
27
MI loop whitening / dewhitening
Whitening right after mixer: zero 3.5 Hz pole 35 Hz Dewhitening for both split passes Passive dewhit-ening done in HV path (0-1kV) dewhiten dewhiten dewhiten Whiten
28
Sensitivity after fixing noise from MI loop
29
Michelson servo design
30
MI loop gain problem Strange observations:
We are not able to increase the low frequency loop gain, even though it should work from loop model (oscillation around 8 Hz) OLG measurements show that there is nearly no gain around 8 to 10 Hz. We needed to turn down the MI crossover gain continiously for the last few months Findings: Influence of MI AA gain on maximum cross over frequency (AA-tilt , cross over possible. phase margin of crossover, can crossover frequency, but adding integrator still causes 8Hz oscillation IM gain ( crossover frequency), less noise in servo 4 to 8 Hz. IM gain, still low gain around 8 to 10 Hz (low gain can‘t be caused by IM)
31
Injecting LF noise in MI loop
Injected noise from 5 to 11 Hz Between 6 and 7 Hz the noise is not suppressed !
32
Measurement of open loop gain (PRMI)
Resonance structure is clearly visible Very low gain around 9 Hz Design gain: 7 @ 15 Hz 20 @ 10 Hz 80 @ 6 Hz
33
Mi servo design detail
34
TF: Alignment to longitudinal
Tilt couples a factor of 10 stronger than 10 Hz. (IM-FF tilt2long) Why are the two rot-TF so different?
35
How to go on with the MI loop gain problem
Measure MI loop gain for various conditions to decouple crossover and AA-tilt. Implementing digital AA control to be more flexible (nearly done). Measure tilt2long for single suspensions, with the goal of setting up a FF system. Investigate possible advantages of using the ESDs for angular alignment. ....
36
Segmented ESD for alignment
37
Sensitivity improvement of GEO
38
Latest noise projections
39
Current sensitivity vs. Design sensitivity
40
Discussion Michelson loop gain problem:
What experience exists in VIRGO with angular to longitudinal and longitudinal to angular couplings ? Is somewhere gain lost ? ... Digital filtering: What kind of filters are used within VIRGO for steep roll off?
41
E n d
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.