Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Commissioning progress Stefan Hild Ilias WG1 meeting, Sep 2005

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Commissioning progress Stefan Hild Ilias WG1 meeting, Sep 2005"— Presentation transcript:

1 Commissioning progress Stefan Hild Ilias WG1 meeting, Sep 2005
Title GEO 600 Commissioning progress Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut) Stefan Hild Ilias WG1 meeting, Sep 2005

2 GEO 600 layout 0.09 1.5-2 kW

3 Tuning signal recycling to 300 Hz
Better knowledge of IFO parameters: more accurate prediction from simulations downtuning to 200 Hz realized Fixed instability of MI auto-alignment by setting up a new telescope for DWS. We will stay at 330 Hz !

4 GEO 600 design sensitivity

5 Calibration and demod phase @ 300 Hz
Using signal recycling GW signal is split in P and Q quadrature P-response independant of demod phase Q-response only for larger than 20 to 30 deg demod phase compatible with current calibration (zero + complex pole) Decided to use 40 deg for time being. Drawback: ‚P‘ used for MI servo is not really only ‚P‘

6 High RF on HPD / Q-compensation
Q-comp OFF Q-comp ON Observations: Found huge RF level after MI diode (1 Volt) Large DC level in Q after mixing. Q-compensation: Injected RF directly into resonance circuit of the HPD to make Q DC level zero. Improved sensitivity above 700 Hz

7 RF setup OLD setup NEW setup Old setup:
Dominated by phase noise in the LO path (phaseshifter and splitter(0/90°) Due to this noise from Q was mixed into P quadrature. That is why Q-compensation worked. OLD setup New setup: Using a less noisy splitter(0/90°) Using a cable as phaseshifter NEW setup

8 Shot noise Green line is the shot noise level calculated from the DC current of the photodiode. We are within a factor sqrt(2) shot noise limited above 1kHz !

9 Proposed by Rana and others
Future RF setup Proposed by Rana and others GOALS: Using only high quality hardware Guaranteeing high RF levels in all components

10 Noise projections 21st of july

11 Noise in the SR-long loop
PROBLEM Noise in the detection band is entirely limited by front-end-noise (shot noise from the detector). Limits sensitivity from 100 to 500 Hz Large locking range OLG of 10^6 at 0.1 Hz No feedback noise above100 Hz Requirements Servo has a locking mode and a running mode Lowering UGF to get less gain in detection band Using lowpass filter with very steep roll off above UGF (implemeted using a dSPACE system) Solutions

12 Analog SR electronics Red = acq amp, green = acq pha
Dark blue = run amp, brown = run phase Light blue = run2 amp, pink = run2 pha

13 Signal Recycling digital
Hz = -147 deg

14 SR feedback: analog vs. digital

15 SR loop filter future design
Four complex integrators: 2.25 (2x),1.3, 0.56 Hz Filter not used at the moment. Can be implemented when more gain is needed around pendulum resonances

16 Sensitivity improvement July to August
High frequency improvements: reduction of RF phase noise Low frequency improvements: reduction of Signal recycling feedback noise

17 PR-bench Historically grown layout of PR-bench not optimal !
beam clipping too many transmissive optical components too many polarizing components acoustic coupling Goal: Shorten and simplify the HPD path

18 Sensitivity after PR bench work
Removed resonance structures between 100 and 200 Hz.

19 Noise projections 21st of july

20 Michelson length control
< 0.1Hz main problem before coincidence run was range of ES drive however this was solved

21 Michelson length control
< 0.1Hz < 10 Hz Reaction Pendulum: 3 coil-magnet actuators at intermediate mass, range ~ 100µm main problem before coincidence run was range of ES drive however this was solved

22 Michelson length control
< 0.1Hz < 10 Hz Reaction Pendulum: 3 coil-magnet actuators at intermediate mass, range ~ 100µm Electrostatic actuation on test mass bias 630V, range 0-900V= 3.5µm > 10 Hz main problem before coincidence run was range of ES drive however this was solved

23 Using ESD as actuator Force is proportional to square of applied voltage. high voltages are needed for bipolar acting a bias voltage needs to be applied Noise is introduced: loop electronics sqrt circuits intrinsic HV amplifier noise

24 Sqrt circuits in MI loop
ESD: F  U^2 Sqrt circuits are necessary to give full linear force range for acquisition. Drawback: sqrt circuits are noisy 1µV/sqrt(Hz) ESD)

25 Sqrt circuits in MI loop
ESD: F  U^2 Sqrt circuits are necessary to give full linear force range for acquisition. Drawback: sqrt circuits are noisy 1µV/sqrt(Hz) ESD) Bypassing sqrt circuits after lock is acquired.

26 Noise in MI loop HVA noise = 100nV/sqrt(Hz) (=10µV/sqrt(Hz) @ ESD)
HV-amplifier noise can be reduced by decreasing bias voltage or active noise suppression. Suppressing noise introduced by loop electronics needs whitening

27 MI loop whitening / dewhitening
Whitening right after mixer: zero 3.5 Hz pole 35 Hz Dewhitening for both split passes Passive dewhit-ening done in HV path (0-1kV) dewhiten dewhiten dewhiten Whiten

28 Sensitivity after fixing noise from MI loop

29 Michelson servo design

30 MI loop gain problem Strange observations:
We are not able to increase the low frequency loop gain, even though it should work from loop model (oscillation around 8 Hz) OLG measurements show that there is nearly no gain around 8 to 10 Hz. We needed to turn down the MI crossover gain continiously for the last few months Findings: Influence of MI AA gain on maximum cross over frequency (AA-tilt ,  cross over possible.  phase margin of crossover, can  crossover frequency, but adding integrator still causes 8Hz oscillation  IM gain ( crossover frequency),  less noise in servo 4 to 8 Hz.  IM gain, still low gain around 8 to 10 Hz (low gain can‘t be caused by IM)

31 Injecting LF noise in MI loop
Injected noise from 5 to 11 Hz Between 6 and 7 Hz the noise is not suppressed !

32 Measurement of open loop gain (PRMI)
Resonance structure is clearly visible Very low gain around 9 Hz Design gain: 7 @ 15 Hz 20 @ 10 Hz 80 @ 6 Hz

33 Mi servo design detail

34 TF: Alignment to longitudinal
Tilt couples a factor of 10 stronger than 10 Hz. (IM-FF tilt2long) Why are the two rot-TF so different?

35 How to go on with the MI loop gain problem
Measure MI loop gain for various conditions to decouple crossover and AA-tilt. Implementing digital AA control to be more flexible (nearly done). Measure tilt2long for single suspensions, with the goal of setting up a FF system. Investigate possible advantages of using the ESDs for angular alignment. ....

36 Segmented ESD for alignment

37 Sensitivity improvement of GEO

38 Latest noise projections

39 Current sensitivity vs. Design sensitivity

40 Discussion Michelson loop gain problem:
What experience exists in VIRGO with angular to longitudinal and longitudinal to angular couplings ? Is somewhere gain lost ? ... Digital filtering: What kind of filters are used within VIRGO for steep roll off?

41 E n d


Download ppt "Commissioning progress Stefan Hild Ilias WG1 meeting, Sep 2005"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google