1. Topic: Judging the Jacksonian Era: Why Did It Break Down?
Based on our previous lessons, what does it mean to be a “Jacksonian Democrat”? Were “Jacksonians” good or bad for the country? Explain in 3-4 sentences.

2. Election of 1836 Jackson will not run for third term
Endorses Martin Van Buren (“little magician”)
Creation of “new” political party –the Whigs
A diverse group, united only in their hatred of Jackson
Northerners and southerners
Election 1836: Whigs still too disorganized
Van Buren wins, but is in Jackson’s shadow

3. Van Buren’s Problems Van Buren opposed by Whigs at every turn
Crash of 1837
Speculation & Jackson’s Spiece Circular (1836)
Wildcat Banks
Crop failures
No US Bank
problems with European trade
Unemployment, public debt
Van Buren’s “Divorce Bill” (Independent Treasury 1840)
Slow economic recovery

4. Van Buren’s Texas Problem
Northern Mexico (Texas) under-populated  Spanish ask for white settlers from US
“Mexicanize” American settlers
Settlers wanted to “stay” American, resented Mexican authority (slavery, immigration issues)
Santa Anna suspends all rights for settlers
1836: Texas declares independence from Mexico (The Alamo)
Texas breaks off, an independent republic by 1837 (Lone Star Republic)
Should Texas be annexed?
Van Buren refuses (slave issue)

5. End of an Era: Election of 1840
Van Buren running again
Economic problems, annexation issue
Whigs nominate William Henry Harrison
General of 1812
Non-entity in politics
“Tippecanoe & Tyler Too”
“Log Cabin” candidate
Harrison wins (234 to 60)
Jacksonian era is at an end… or is it?

6. Conclusion
Do you think “Jacksonian Democracy” ended with Van Buren? Explain your opinion in 3-4 sentences.