1. Vision 20/20: Checks and Balances
The Data Driven Decision Making Process in Mathematics
Annie Klian, Instructional Supervisor
Michelle White, Executive Director
Office of Academics and Transformation
Department of Mathematics

2. Session Objectives
Progress Monitoring: i-Ready, Topic Assessments, and Mid- Year Assessment: What is our current level of performance as a district? As a school? What guidance can we gain from our school and district data results?
School-Wide Strategies: What strategies can we implement school-wide to reach our intended outcomes?
Classroom Strategies: What instructional adjustments need to be made in the core classes to reach our intended outcomes?

3. Looking Back to Synergy
Framework of Effective Instruction
Framework of Effective Instruction for Math
ASSESSMENT
“The more reflective we are, the more effective we are.”
-Pete Hall

4. Grade-Level Standards FSA Grade-Level Reporting Categories
“Data connects me to my students and their learning, pushes me to high levels of reflection on my practice, and spurs me to engage in dialogue with colleagues, students, and parents.” –Jennifer Morrison, ASCD
MAFS
Grade-Level Standards
Topic Assessment Algebra 1 MYA Geometry MYA
Grade-Level Concepts
i-Ready
RtI Levels
Adaptive
Prerequisite Skills
Grade-Level Content
FSA
Grade-Level Reporting Categories

5. Focal Points Predicted Proficiency District Report
Predicted Proficiency School Report
Intervention Screener Report
Topic Assessment Results
Algebra 1/Geometry MYA Results
Essential Teacher Data Reports from G2D

7. Predicted Proficiency Report

8. *Data was extracted from i-Ready on 1/13/17
Part I

9. Predicted Proficiency School Report
Link to Report: i-Ready Predicted Proficient on FSA Report
Remember- this report is not to make conclusions about instruction since it is not comparing same groups of students, but rather to see the status towards the school performance between the previous year and the current school year.
*Data was extracted on 12/23/2016
Part II

10. Predicted Proficiency Report
GROUP DISCUSSION:
When reviewing your school’s Predicted Proficiency Report:
How does the Predicted Proficiency for each grade level compare to last year’s FSA results? Why is the margin of error important?
How does this data assist you in decision-making (i.e., decisions on interventions, reflective dialogue with teachers, etc.)?
Predicted Proficiency Report

11. Predicted Proficiency by Class Report
Part III
*not in Power BI

12. Intervention Screener Report
District-Level Data Results

13. School Summary Intervention Screener Report
Part IV
School Summary Intervention Screener Report
Monitoring Student Progress

14. Intervention Screener Report- District Results
Grades 6-8
Grades 6-8
Tier 1 Change
Tier 2 Change
Tier 3
Change 6%
-1%
-5%
Part IV
* Source: Power BI as of 1/13/17

15. Intervention Screener-District Results by Grade
Tier 1 Change
Tier 2 Change
Tier 3
Change 6 8%
-2%
-5% 7 7%
-1%
-6% 8 4%
-4%
Part IV
* Source: Power BI as of 1/13/17

16. Intervention Screener Report
Accessing School-Level Data using Power BI
Part IV

19. School Summary Intervention Screener Report
Part IV
School Summary Intervention Screener Report
Monitoring Student Progress

20. 6

21. Analyzing the Intervention Screener Report
SCENARIOS:
When reviewing the Intervention Screener Report, you notice the following changes in percentage points. What are your immediate thoughts to be able to make conclusions and set goals?
Scenario A: For Tier 2, the percent of change is positive for grade 6.
Scenario B: For Tier 1, the percent of change is negative for grade 7.
Scenario C: For Tier 3, there is no change for grade 8.
Analyzing the Intervention Screener Report
How do these reports help monitor the effectiveness of instruction, remediation, and/or intervention?

22. Analyzing the Intervention Screener Report
GROUP DISCUSSION:
When reviewing the Intervention Screener Report for your school, what changes in percentage points do you notice?
Discuss at your tables:
How do you use these reports help monitor the effectiveness of instruction, remediation, and/or intervention?
What does your school’s data tell you? What are your next steps?
Analyzing the Intervention Screener Report
How do these reports help monitor the effectiveness of instruction, remediation, and/or intervention?
District Results
Grade
Tier 1 Change
Tier 2 Change
Tier 3
Change 6 8%
-2%
-5% 7 7%
-1%
-6% 8 4%
-4%
6-8 6%

23. Additional i-Ready Data Using Power BI

26. Topic Assessments
District-Level Data Results

27. Topic Assessments: District Average Percent Correct

29. Topic Assessments: District Average Percent Correct

31. Topic Assessments: District Average Percent Correct

33. Topic Assessments
Accessing School-Level Data using Power BI

36. School Comparison: Topic Assessment Results

37. Analyzing Topic Assessment Data
GROUP DISCUSSION:
In Power BI, examine the Topic Assessment data for your school, selecting one grade level and course.
Identify the Topic(s) that students struggled with the most as well as the strongest.
Use the Content At-A-Glance documents to identify the Reporting Categories taught in those Topics.
Use the Test Design Summary document to identify how this Reporting Category is weighted (% of Test).
Guiding Questions:
Which Topic shows the greatest need for remediation for each grade level? How are the Reporting Categories for these Topics weighted?
Can your teachers identify those Topics and standards for which students are the most/least successful? How do you know? What are some steps they are currently taking to address the data? What are some next steps to consider?
Analyzing Topic Assessment Data

38. Math Content Focus: At-A-Glance

39. Math Content Focus: At-A-Glance

40. FSA Test Design Summary

41. Algebra 1/Geometry Mid-Year Assessment

42. Topic Assessments and MYA: District Average Percent Correct

43. School Comparison: Middle Grades Algebra 1 MYA Results

44. ***Data includes BOTH high school and middle grades data
Algebra 1
Algebra 1 MYA
Standards: 21
Total # Questions: 55
Item Type
DOK 1 2 3
Multiselect
14 (25%) 10
M.C.
41 (75%) 17 22
% of items 36 58 5
Algebra 1 FSA
Percentage of Computer-Based Test Composed of Technology-Enhanced Items: 40% - 60%
2016 Lowest RC: Stats/NS, then Functions & Modeling
2015 Lowest RC: Functions & Modeling
DOK 1
DOK 2
DOK 3
10%-20%
60%-80%
FSA Mathematics Test Design Summary
Mid-Year Assessment Report

46. ***Data includes BOTH high school and middle grades data
Geometry
Geometry MYA
Standards: 15
Total # Questions: 48
Item Type
DOK 1 2 3
Multiselect
5 (10%) 4
M.C.
43 (90%) 12 27
% of items 65 8
Geometry FSA
Percentage of Computer-Based Test Composed of Technology-Enhanced Items: 40% - 60%
2016 Lowest RC: Geometry & Modeling then Circles, Geometric Measurement & Geometric Properties with Equations
2015 Lowest RC: Geometry & Modeling
DOK 1
DOK 2
DOK 3
10%-20%
60%-80%
FSA Mathematics Test Design Summary
Mid-Year Assessment Report

48. 2016-2017 Algebra 1/Geometry Mid-Year Assessment
GROUP DISCUSSION:
When reviewing your school’s Algebra 1/Geometry Mid-Year Assessment data:
How does your school compare to the District results? To schools with similar demographics/Tier?
What are some steps your teachers are currently taking to address the data? What are some next steps to consider?
Algebra 1/Geometry Mid-Year Assessment

49. Essential Data Reports from G2D for DI and Remediation
Topic Assessments and Mid-Year Assessments

50. Types of Data Reports on G2D
Distractor Analysis
Item Analysis
Standard Analysis
At Risk Report

51. Use Drop-Down menu to select exam
G2D Reports
Go to Reporting Tab and select assessment and type of report to view.
Expand
Use Drop-Down menu to select exam
and select Search
Click on % to view report types

53. Note- If a school does not offer Intensive Math, then the core teachers can use ANY of the resources in the Ready Toolbox.

54. District Developed Resources
Algebra 1
District Developed Resources
Optional Comprehensive Assessment Window
H.M.H. Resources
Edgenuity Resources
CPALMS Resources

55. Data Usage Best Practices
Data Analysis – Mini PD for Teachers

56. Computer-Based Testing
Paper-Based
Computer-Based Testing
Math Updates

57. CBT and PBT Topic Assessments
Weekly Briefing # & 20621
CBT and PBT Topic Assessments
In order to provide students with opportunities to practice with additional technology-enhanced item types (TEIs) in preparation for FSA, each Topic Assessment posted in Gateway to Data (G2D) will have a Computer-Based Only version and a Paper-Based version.
Grades 6-8
Algebra 1 & Geometry
6th Grade Regular Topic VI Assessment
6th Grade Advanced Topic VI Assessment
7th Grade Regular Topic VII Assessment
7th Grade Advanced Topic VIII Assessment
8th Grade Regular Topics VI & VII Assessment (Combined Topic Assessment)
Algebra I Topics VII & VIII Assessment (Combined Topic Assessment)
Geometry Topic VII Assessment
Naming Convention- Grades 6-8:
“CBT: 6th Grade Regular Topic VI Assessment - Mathematics”
“Paper-Based: 6th Grade Regular Topic VI Assessment - Mathematics”
Naming Convention- Algebra & Geometry:
“Geometry Topic 7 Test”
“Geometry Topic 7 Test – Paper-Based”

58. CBT Comprehensive Assessment- Optional
FSA
Paper-Based Version will be available
Administration Window: February 27th through March 3rd
Scanning, Data Analysis, and Planning: March 6th through March 10th
Standards Review and Remediation (bellringers, DI, etc): March 13th through April 7th
FSA Window Opens: April 17th

60. Middle Grades Mathematics
Thank You!
Department of Mathematics
Middle Grades Mathematics
1501 N.E. 2nd Avenue, Suite 326
Miami, FL
Office:
Fax: