1. Strong Workforce Strategies

2. Strong Workforce Strategies
Allocate funds according to needs of labor market

3. Funding Formula CTE FTES
Usual way - allocate on the basis of who we are already serving

4. Funding Formula
CTE FTES

5. Allocate on the basis of where the need and opportunities are
Funding Formula
Job Openings
CTE FTES
Unemployed
Allocate on the basis of where the
need and opportunities are

7. Successful Workforce Outcomes
Funding Formula
Job Openings
Successful Workforce Outcomes
CTE FTES
Unemployed
Funding for getting people into jobs
& beyond

8. Strong Workforce Strategies
Allocate funds according to needs of labor market
Utilize 60% of funds to directly resource colleges to provide more and better CTE
Focus on labor market gaps
Utilize outcomes data to guide investments
No supplanting
Minimal constraints on use of funding - be reasonable!
No review - self certify!
No RFP

9. Strong Workforce Strategies
Allocate funds according to needs of labor market
Utilize 60% of funds to directly resource colleges to provide more and better CTE
Convene workforce development stakeholders to align efforts

13. WHY THINK REGIONAL? We were hired/elected to serve our local districts!

14. LOCAL RULES

15. IF LOCAL RULES …
WHY REGIONAL?

16. LOCAL ISN’T ALWAYS THE RIGHT SIZE
some challenges are too small
some challenges are too big
some challenges are too important

17. REGIONAL ECONOMY ☑ regional economic clusters ☑ regional employers
☑ regional business associations
☑ regionally mobile workforce
☐ regional coordinated workforce development

18. LEVERAGING OUR SCALE sharing knowledge, experience, expertise
curriculum, programs
processes, policies, procedures
pooling resources
professional development
curriculum development
industry engagement
advocacy

22. Strong Workforce Strategies
Allocate funds according to needs of labor market
Utilize 60% of funds to directly resource colleges to provide more and better CTE
Convene workforce development stakeholders to align efforts
Direct 40% of funds through Regional Consortia to facilitate collaborative approaches
Colleges vote where to direct funds to best achieve SWP goals
All funds must go to colleges

23. Genius of 40% Allocation Strategy
Goal is to meet employers needs, provide pathways to prosperity
Funds, responsibility and accountability delegated to colleges
Investment standard: Where will the funds deliver the best outcomes?
Regional Planning process surfaces partnerships that can deliver greater value
Annual allocation of 40% funds engages college leadership in question of how can we get the best outcomes for our colleges?

27. Strong Workforce Strategies
Allocate funds according to needs of labor market
Utilize 60% of funds to directly resource colleges to provide more and better CTE
Convene workforce development stakeholders to align efforts
Direct 40% of funds through Regional Consortia to facilitate collaborative approaches
Pay attention to results and adjust accordingly

28. Annual Cycle Investment & Execution Evaluation/Reporting Planning
Local Investments
Regional Consortium Investments
Stakeholder Investments
Evaluation/Reporting
Planning
Local Assessment
Local Planning
Reallocation
Regional Assessment
Regional Planning
Adjustments to funding levels based on opportunities (job openings), need (unemployment) and performance (common measure outcomes)
Governor
Chancellor’s Office
Legislature
Adjustments to SWP framework based on what was learned in previous cycle

29. Strong Workforce Strategies
Allocate funds according to needs of labor market
Utilize 60% of funds to directly resource colleges to provide more and better CTE
Convene workforce development stakeholders to align efforts
Direct 40% of funds through Regional Consortia to facilitate collaborative approaches
Pay attention to results and adjust accordingly

30. $2B
$200M
2,700 hours

31. We are responsible

32. Curriculum Streamlining and Curriculum Portability Panel
John Stanskas, Vice President of ASCCC
Dolores Davison, Secretary of ASCCC
Jackie Escajeda, Dean of Curriculum & Instruction, CCCCO

33. Overview What’s new & next steps - Chancellor’s Office
ASCCC perspective
CCC Committee on Curriculum (formerly SACC)
North Far North Streamlining Project

34. What’s New Program and Course Handbook (PAH), 6th Edition
Credit course non-substantial change
Stand alone courses
New curriculum inventory system (COCI)

35. Next Steps PCAH, 6th Edition rollout Stand alone courses
CIO certification
Guidelines for training and procedures
Exploring more ideas to streamline curriculum
Examining title 5 language pertaining to curriculum

36. Next Steps COCI Launch date is December 2016 COCI Pilot Colleges
Santiago Canyon
Foothill
Rio Hondo
Long Beach Community College
Los Rios
Ohlone
Grossmont
Crafton Hilly
Moorpark
College of the Canyons
Launch date is December 2016

37. Academic Senate Efforts
Ensuring Effective Curriculum Approval Processes: A Guide for Local Senates
Partnership with CIOs to provide Curriculum Technical Assistance
Working with the CO to ID areas for streamlining approval processes at the state level

38. Academic Senate Efforts for 2016-17
Regional Curriculum Meetings
Develop guidance regarding New Program Development
Identifying prior learning experiences
Develop guidance regarding noncredit programs and courses
C-ID

39. CCC Curriculum Committee
PCAH, 6th Edition rollout
Stand alone courses
CIO certification
Guidelines for training and procedures
Exploring more ideas to streamline curriculum
Examining title 5 language pertaining to curriculum

40. CCC Curriculum Task Force
Composition of the Task Force
CO Academic Affairs Representation
CO WEDD Representation
CEOs
CIOs
ASCCC
Curriculum Specialist

41. CCC Curriculum Task Force
The Task Force will bring recommendations to the field in Spring regarding more efficient ways that the Chancellor’s Office can support curriculum processes for the colleges.

43. North-Far North Project
Recommendation 8
Evaluate, revise, and resource the local and regional statewide CTE curriculum approval processes to ensure timely, responsive, rigorous and streamlined curriculum
This should not be limited to CTE curriculum – we want this for all curriculum

45. North-Far North Project
Goals
Respond quickly to changes in industry or transfer needs
Increase regional collaboration
Improve system processes at the regional level
Improve local curriculum processes

46. North-Far North Project
Regional Team
created to evaluate regional processes and explore possible improvements in portability, local curriculum approval, and regional coordination
Create regional effective practices that can be evaluated by CCCCC and possibly used in other regions across the state

47. North-Far North Project
Regional Action Team Composition Meeting Oct 13-14
NFN Regional Consortium Co-Chair
CEO
CIO
ASCCC
CTE Deans
15 Curriculum Chairs
15 CTE Faculty

48. North-Far North Project
Local Approval
Curriculum Committees/Academic Senates recommend to local Boards of Trustees to approve curriculum
Regional Recommendation
Role of the Regional Consortium is to recommend programs that meet the needs of the region
Chancellor’s Office Certification
CCCCC Task Force will define parameters through which the CO can streamline certification

49. Questions? Thank you! Jackie Escajeda jescajeda@cccco.edu
Dolores Davison
John Stanskas