Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byShauna Phillips Modified over 6 years ago
1
Developing design criteria Design Objectives Trees
9/21/2018 AAE 490B Week 3 Lecture 6 Developing design criteria Design Objectives Trees Safe ladder for construction Safe Marketable Portable Inexpensive Durable Useful Stiff Stable Indoors Outdoors Right height Light weight Small, transportable Level ground On floors Must meet OSHA safety standards Northrop Grumman Private/Proprietary Level I
2
Copyright 2006 Purdue University
Mission Statement AAE490B Project Team 10: Ryan Milmoe, Jesii Doyle, Nick Vazquez, Matt Fosler Product Description Cost effective Innovative High lifecycle Reliable Ability to orbit at least MEO Upgradeable Expandable Able to monitor large area with high resolution September 21, 2018 Copyright 2006 Purdue University
3
Copyright 2006 Purdue University
Mission Statement AAE490B Project Team 10: Ryan Milmoe, Jesii Doyle, Nick Vazquez, Matt Fosler Key Business Goals Win bid Good return on investment Longevity Adaptability Good business ethics September 21, 2018 Copyright 2006 Purdue University
4
Copyright 2006 Purdue University
Mission Statement AAE490B Project Team 10: Ryan Milmoe, Jesii Doyle, Nick Vazquez, Matt Fosler Key Customer Benefits Cost-effective business solution to product requirements Ability to monitor large viewing area with high resolution High industrial visibility Attack resistant product September 21, 2018 Copyright 2006 Purdue University
5
Copyright 2006 Purdue University
Mission Statement AAE490B Project Team 10: Ryan Milmoe, Jesii Doyle, Nick Vazquez, Matt Fosler Target Markets Defense agencies Google Mapping industries Civil space agencies September 21, 2018 Copyright 2006 Purdue University
6
Copyright 2006 Purdue University
Mission Statement AAE490B Project Team 10: Ryan Milmoe, Jesii Doyle, Nick Vazquez, Matt Fosler Stakeholders Team 10 Potential buyers Potential suppliers Third party users Existing and future satellite companies Launch vehicle companies September 21, 2018 Copyright 2006 Purdue University
7
Today’s plan Develop an objectives tree in which we list our objectives, even if they aren’t in the right word form Make sure all ideas are captured Then, put items in the right word form Identify higher level categories and group them Draw the objectives tree
8
Effective design begins with understanding the goals and possibilities
All design goals should be traceable to the list of system objectives Goals should be quantifiable and verifiable – fuzzy doesn’t do it – Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) and Measures of Performance (MOP) Design options often yield objectives
9
System effectiveness over time decreases and requires new solutions
10
Objectives trees support the development of the House of Quality (HoQ)
11
Objectives - quantifiable expectations of performance some of these objectives will “drive” the design Needs, Goals and Mission are the first steps in design Objectives definition comes next -examples “Keep the cost of the bumper low” “Use the ladder for indoor electrical work” “Make sure the sump pump is not noisy” “Operate out of small airports like Des Moines” “Our performance expectations are …” Understand constraints “Tie one hand behind back” “Bumper less than 50 pounds” “Radar return less than 0.1 Db”
12
Developing the objectives tree
Identify and Organize objectives beginning with high levels of importance and breaking them down into sub-objectives Notice clumps Hitchin’s Third System Law: The size of the screw-up is inversely proportional to the elapsed project time
13
Constructing the objectives tree what the client wants and what the users need
We need to sort because our brainstormed list will contain: Goals & Objectives ends we try to achieve by making something happen attributes or behavior the client and system users will find attractive Things that the design “will be” (the being statements) as opposed to “must do” - the “being statements” “Stiff” is a “being” statement Objectives can also be written as statements that “more (or less) of the goal is better than “less (or more) of the goal” “Lighter is better than heavier” Objectives should be written so that they help us choose between designs Objectives must be measured somehow Constraints Functions Means or implementation
14
Reminder - Constraints are important, but they are not objectives
Constraints = “Restrictions or limitations on a behavior or value or some other aspect of the design performance” Constraints should not appear in the first version of the objectives tree Constraints restrict or limit the size of the design space Constraints allow us to clearly reject some designs or design components while objectives allow us to choose between alternatives, some of which are better than others Constraints are stated as clearly defined limits whose satisfaction is either a yes (does) or no (does not)
15
An example of getting the mission right
Identify stakeholders and other systems – identify their needs also Typical Stakeholder objectives
16
Class exercise - User generated request for our System of Interest (SOI)
Innovative Advanced Concept Technology Demonstrator Innovative concepts for the prototype of a new, space-based Earth orbiting system to replace existing LEO-based satellites for wide area surveillance. This new system is to operate at high orbits above the Earth where vulnerability to attack is less. Who are stakeholders? Why would people use this system? What kinds of surveillance? What other systems operate with this system?
17
Develop a list of space system objectives using the client’s words
The system is to be versatile and perhaps modular so that it can be more reliable, more responsive, upgradeable and capable of being launched in component form so that risk of a single failure is removed. It should anticipate the need for large area terrestrial surveillance by having the capability of operating at larger distances from the Earth, in orbits that are at least in MEO Prime system features to consider are the total area monitored and target resolution. It is important to understand how these choices influence orbit selection, system weight and complexity. What does versatile mean? What components of a space system can be modular? What should be upgradeable? What are critical components? How do you assemble a space system? What is large area surveillance? How high is MEO? What are special operating conditions at MEO? What are the trades we will make? What kind of resolution do we have today? What determines resolution? What is a space system anyway? Are the targets standing still or moving?
18
More client info to be digested
New design concepts such as deployable actively controlled membranes, connected and unconnected sparse aperture mirrors, and modularized space system concepts launched on small rockets are among the many new concepts being proposed for future systems. In addition, virtual links between space system modules, enabled by wireless systems and adaptive control algorithms, can reduce structural component weight and blur the distinction between payload and the vehicle bus. Sounds like they are interested in “cool stuff.”
19
Space system tentative objectives list
Reduced cost compared to large systems Increased reliability Reduced weight Reduced volume Increase system life System must be replenishable System must be upgradeable System should minimize redundancy System should incorporate modular design Capable of being launched in modular form Capable of being assembled in orbit Must operate in MEO orbits Monitor wide areas of the Earth Achieve high resolution Be responsive to requests for data Reduce need for system onboard propellant storage
20
Read on to get more insight
Proposals are solicited for advanced concepts to provide remote viewing of Earth features that equal or exceed current systems such as SPOT. How the system looks down, whether it uses a large mirror or a series of mirrors as part of its telescope, whether the system is monolithic or segmented, the field of view and degree of resolution are left to the bidder. The space system will have the capability of being launched in small vehicles, such as the new Falcon series of rockets. Special attention must be given to system cost, responsiveness to requests for data, repair, upgradeability, remote assembly, ground check-out time and cost and the consequences of a failure of any one vehicle.
21
Space system objectives list expands
Reduced cost of large systems Increased reliability Reduced weight Reduced volume Increase system life System must be replenishable System must be upgradeable System should minimize redundancy System should demonstrate modular design System must be modular Capable of being launched in modular form Capable of being assembled in orbit Capable of being launched on small vehicles Reduce consequences of launch failure Must operate in wide range of orbital planes for wide area coverage Monitor critical areas of the Earth Achieve high resolution Reduce need for system onboard propellant storage Earth pictures must be as good as SPOT – what’s SPOT? Onboard computer processing must be upgradeable Must use new technologies Check out time short
22
… and, finally … Communications and data rates will be determined by the bidder. Initial operation will occur in 2015, but a description of anticipated improvements in the system, based upon bidder knowledge of state-of-the-art development must be presented in the proposal.
23
Space system objectives list expands
Reduced cost of large systems Increased reliability Reduced weight Reduced volume Increase system life System must be replenishable System must be upgradeable System should minimize redundancy System should demonstrate modular design System must be modular Capable of being launched in modular form Capable of being assembled in orbit Initial operation by 2015 Capable of being launched on small vehicles Reduce consequences of launch failure Must operate in wide range of orbital planes for wide area coverage Monitor critical areas of the Earth Achieve high resolution Reduce need for system onboard propellant storage Earth pictures must be as good as SPOT – what’s SPOT? Onboard computer processing must be upgradeable Must use new technologies Check out time short
24
Pruned objectives list
How? Answer questions like “what do you mean by … ? As you work down the list you will answer generic “how” questions. Why?
25
Use the brainstormed list to clump items and develop a Hierarchal Chart
Goals & Objectives such as: Must be reliable Should be relatively inexpensive Payload weight should be minimized to reduce cost Refuelable to increase system longevity No superfluous components Constraints Must be operational by 2015 Launched on small Falcon vehicles Functions Observe and sense the Earth’s electromagnetic and visual spectrum
26
Previous class’s partial Attributes List
9/21/2018 Previous class’s partial Attributes List Versatile Reliable User friendly Modular Affordable Upgradeable Responsive Able to survey large terrestrial area Technologically advanced Durable Useful for military and private applications Lightweight Fuel efficient Northrop Grumman Private/Proprietary Level I
27
A first attempt at an objectives tree
Space-Based Earth Observation System Maximize advanced technology Long life Reliable Low cost operation Low cost launch Replenishable Launch in Component Form Replace Existing Technology More Responsive Modular Large Area of Terrestrial Surveillance Little Onboard Prop Upgradeable
28
A different objectives tree from last year
29
Safe ladder for construction Must meet OSHA safety standards
Now – try your hand at it and send results to Jasmine and me by noon Friday. Safe ladder for construction Safe Marketable Portable Inexpensive Durable Useful Stiff Stable Indoors Outdoors Right height Light weight Small, transportable Level ground On floors Must meet OSHA safety standards
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.