Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byΘεμιστοκλῆς Γαλάνη Modified over 6 years ago
1
Excellence for society International evaluation of research and doctoral TRAINING at the University of Helsinki Vice-Rector Johanna Björkroth 7 May 2012
2
Outline Role of Steering group Risk taking endeavour
Evaluation aspects Success of RCs in evaluation Rewards Osasto / Henkilön nimi / Esityksen nimi
3
Steering group (2010-2012) and its role
Vice-Rector Johanna Björkroth (pj) Professor Marja Airaksinen (vpj) Chief information specialist Maria Forsman Professor Arto Mustajoki Univ. lecturer Kirsi Pyhältö Director, Academic Affairs Ossi Tuomi Doctoral candidate Jussi Vauhkonen
4
Some critical questions discussed
Participation categories Researcher Community – in evaluation – in future Voluntary participation Performance profiles related to success and rewarding Usefulness of data and reports Bibliometrics Societal impact
5
Evaluation aspects in Panels’ feedback
Scientific quality Scientific significance Societal impact Processes of leadership and management Collaboration Innovativeness Future significance
6
Material given to the Panels
E-forms List of publications (TUHAT) List of other scientific activities (TUHAT) CWTS/Leiden bibliometric analyses RCs Entire University HULib bibliometric analyses for the RCs Doctoral Survey Background information Statistics about the UH and the Finnish HE
7
Participating Researcher Communities (page161)
8
Quality and focus of research
Mean of scores (1-5) Natural Sciences Biological, Agr. and Vet. Scs 4.02 Humanities Medicine, Biomed and Health Scs 4.00 Social Scs (Page 168)
9
Doctoral training Mean of scores (1-5) 4.02 Humanities 4.30
Medicine, biomed and Health Scs 4.09 Natural Scs Biological, Agr. and Vet. Scs 3.88 Social Scs (Page 168)
10
Societal impact Mean of scores (1-5) 4.03 Humanities 4.18
Medicine, biomed and Health. Scs 4.17 Biological, Agr. and Vet Scs 4.02 Social Scs Natural Scs (Page 168)
11
Collaboration Mean of scores (1-5) 4.08
Medicine, biomed and Health Scs Natural Scs Social Scs Humanities Biological, Agr. and Vet. Scs (Page 168)
12
Distributions of numeric evaluation – Panel:
Biological, Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences (page 67)
13
Distributions of numeric evaluation – Panel:
Medicine, Biomedicine and Health Sciences (page84)
14
Distributions of numeric evaluation – Panel:
Natural Sciences (page 105)
15
Distributions of numeric evaluation – Panel: Humanities (page125)
16
Distributions of numeric evaluation – Panel: Social Sciences (page146)
17
Monetary rewards for the years 2013 - 2016
Total million euro – division based on the performance of research and doctoral training Rewards will be addressed according to the numerical scores of RCs in participation categories The highest 30 percent in each category will be rewarded Score level of success is unique in each category Amount of reward will be determined according to the number of PIs in successful RCs The success criteria is determined by the first four evaluation questions
18
Category 1: Cutting edge (page 345)
19
Category 2: Close to Cutting Edge (page 346)
20
Category 3: Exceptional (page 346)
21
Category 4: Innovative opening (page 347)
22
Category 5: Societal impact (page 347)
23
Conclusion MORE – Helsinki Has been noted by other universities
Produced a valuable set of data Initiated discussion about collaboration Produced first time bibliometric raports
24
All reports are available in electronic form:
Thank you All reports are available in electronic form: University-level paperback report can be ordered:
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.